ImageImageImageImageImage

Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, DG88

Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,300
And1: 24,576
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#501 » by Pointgod » Mon Jan 5, 2026 3:41 pm

TheRaptor! wrote:
Clutch0z24 wrote:
TGM wrote:
Agree we shouldn’t be playing for the middle. Given that we have Scottie we aren’t going to tear it down and rebuild so it makes the whole direction pretty easy. The issue with most fans is people want top 10 players at top 30 value. Just doesn’t happen cause top 10 players rarely come on the market.

The Raps are not in a horrible situation, but also not in the best like a SA or OKC. Let me lay out realistic options on how they compete.

1. Push the chips in and mortgage the next 5-6 years on someone like Giannis. You pretty much hope Barnes, Giannis and Ingram along with some role players can win you a chip. It’s a strong team, but not sure if we are top 4 in the league. I would probably do it.

2. You trade for reclamation projects that are undervalued due to their team taking a different direction. Reclamation projects come in two groups, guys buried in depth and stars that are on teams just not looking to compete and need to fire sale. Sabonis, Ja, Sharpe, White, Monk, Kyrie, Gafford are some players that fall in that group. Just think when th Bulls dealt Markanen to the Jazz or when the Cavs dealt Sexton. These are quality players at fractional prices.

3. Value snipe as a 3rd team in big trades. Nets, OKC and Jazz are absolutely rapists when it comes to this. They always find a way to absorb large salaries that are partially reclamation projects with potential while gaining draft capital. They usually do it by cycling expiring contracts in return or provide cap space absorption.

4. Roll the dice on high risk high reward stars. Davis, Young, LaMelo. These are guys that come at a 50% discount because of injury, contract demands, etc… I personally feel this group you stay away unless it is 30 cents on the dollar.


Option 1 gives you the most certainty but if it fails you set the team back several years and will need to be ready for a full rebuild. It is a more sensible strategy for free agent attractive markets as even though they gift up assets they can always pick back up tier 1 players at no cost. Miami, GS, LA, NY are teams that fall in that category.

Option 2 is really what makes the most sense for the Raptors. Get a guy like Sabonis who won’t cost a kings ransom. You are a competitive playoff team. You bam on improvement across your roster and keep liquid enough to still pull off an option 1 move when ready.

Option 3 is another one, but it would need to be something where Giannis is going to NY and they need to move someone like Towns but the Bucks not wanting Towns and prefer pics and younger players back.

Option 4 is just not the type of deal we can risk unless the price is absolutely low. If it means giving up a few of our larger contracts, IQ, Jak and 1 first rounder and a bench player like Dick sure, but anything that needs two starters, 2 first a CMB and Dick should be avoided. Such a trade can absolutely blow up and the team is caught in limbo and out of assets to make a meaningful move going forward.


Yep i think Raptor fans tend to say every player that is on the trade market sucks.....Donovan Mitchell when he was on the market "Sucked and shot chucker" , KD "Sucks and old can't lead a team", All these guys on the market now no one likes....

Giannis would obviously be the one guy who could actually make us legit contenders but the only way he comes here is if he hand picks us as the destination he wants to come to because we would not have the assets to win in a trade for him anyways....Rockets/Spurs/Okc easily outbid us....Prolly other teams could as well we lack alot of enticing assets outside of Barnes for that kind of a player....

I think Raptors fans want to play the "Lets compete" but think every player thats not on the Raptors suck.....Or in Raptors fans minds the only way we make a trade is for Giannis, Shai, Doncic, Kawhi, Jokic anything outside of that they all suck....That is so far from reality with what we could even get in a trade because we lack the attractive assets to even trade for these kind of players to begin with....Let alone them even being available....

Chances are if a trade is made for a player it will be for one of these flawed guys Morant/Ball/Sabonis/AD/Trae type of players....Idek if we have the assets to get that trade done....We will see how it goes though...


I remember that!!

What a huge joke that was, a top SG was some how a bad player haha


The Mitchell trade has aged pretty well, it’s the team around him that’s been a disappointment. There’s a certain segment of Raptors fans that **** on every non Raptors player and overrated our own players.
User avatar
Brinbe
RealGM
Posts: 67,060
And1: 41,728
Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Location: Terana
         

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#502 » by Brinbe » Mon Jan 5, 2026 3:51 pm

I'd much rather they just go get Day'Ron Sharpe if he's available. I don't think they need a high-volume/star level big like Davis/Sabonis, just someone that can do what Yak did, just with more availability.

And I think IQ is the victim of expectation as actually upgrading on him isn't necessarily as easy as it seems considering what he brings in terms of his shooting.
Image
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 18,640
And1: 13,506
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#503 » by PushDaRock » Mon Jan 5, 2026 4:40 pm

Brinbe wrote:I'd much rather they just go get Day'Ron Sharpe if he's available. I don't think they need a high-volume/star level big like Davis/Sabonis, just someone that can do what Yak did, just with more availability.

And I think IQ is the victim of expectation as actually upgrading on him isn't necessarily as easy as it seems considering what he brings in terms of his shooting.


Sharpe isn't anything amazing but they don't need to move him making it likely an overpay if you want to get him. He's still 24 and has a team option next season, so he still fits their timeline.
Spida888
Starter
Posts: 2,417
And1: 1,934
Joined: Mar 05, 2021
 

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#504 » by Spida888 » Mon Jan 5, 2026 4:53 pm

Brinbe wrote:I'd much rather they just go get Day'Ron Sharpe if he's available. I don't think they need a high-volume/star level big like Davis/Sabonis, just someone that can do what Yak did, just with more availability.

And I think IQ is the victim of expectation as actually upgrading on him isn't necessarily as easy as it seems considering what he brings in terms of his shooting.

Agree that Sharpe can be a good get with low risk compared to some other big names. If we can get him for Ochai, Temple and SRPs, that'd be a small win.

With IQ I'd push back a little because it depends on whether we get a better overall PG than him. However, I don't think it's a rush we need to trade him this season. My general criticism of him is he's overpaid and is more of a combo guard that can't break down the defender 1-on-1. His shooting is welcome but can be streaky.
User avatar
Brinbe
RealGM
Posts: 67,060
And1: 41,728
Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Location: Terana
         

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#505 » by Brinbe » Mon Jan 5, 2026 5:28 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
Brinbe wrote:I'd much rather they just go get Day'Ron Sharpe if he's available. I don't think they need a high-volume/star level big like Davis/Sabonis, just someone that can do what Yak did, just with more availability.

And I think IQ is the victim of expectation as actually upgrading on him isn't necessarily as easy as it seems considering what he brings in terms of his shooting.


Sharpe isn't anything amazing but they don't need to move him making it likely an overpay if you want to get him. He's still 24 and has a team option next season, so he still fits their timeline.

Yep, he boards his ass off and that would be his biggest super power but it's an impactful one. The other major positive is that the price tag to acquire would presumably not be anything crazy and as you said he does fit the timeline. The Nets did all the development work and we can reap the benefits as he goes into the prime of his career

Spida888 wrote:
Brinbe wrote:I'd much rather they just go get Day'Ron Sharpe if he's available. I don't think they need a high-volume/star level big like Davis/Sabonis, just someone that can do what Yak did, just with more availability.

And I think IQ is the victim of expectation as actually upgrading on him isn't necessarily as easy as it seems considering what he brings in terms of his shooting.

Agree that Sharpe can be a good get with low risk compared to some other big names. If we can get him for Ochai, Temple and SRPs, that'd be a small win.

With IQ I'd push back a little because it depends on whether we get a better overall PG than him. However, I don't think it's a rush we need to trade him this season. My general criticism of him is he's overpaid and is more of a combo guard that can't break down the defender 1-on-1. His shooting is welcome but can be streaky.


That's the thing, all the guards that are out there all have their warts (and are all probably worse shooters) and will want max money, so I don't know if that's worth it. The actual guards that would be upgrades aren't really guys that are available and I don't think IQ has been anywhere near bad enough that we should do a deal just to do it.

And I think it is notable that he's still managed to be a positive player despite slumping so that suggests that there is still some upside there that can tapped into when his game does turn around and he works past his current difficulties.
Image
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 18,640
And1: 13,506
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#506 » by PushDaRock » Mon Jan 5, 2026 5:58 pm

Brinbe wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Brinbe wrote:I'd much rather they just go get Day'Ron Sharpe if he's available. I don't think they need a high-volume/star level big like Davis/Sabonis, just someone that can do what Yak did, just with more availability.

And I think IQ is the victim of expectation as actually upgrading on him isn't necessarily as easy as it seems considering what he brings in terms of his shooting.


Sharpe isn't anything amazing but they don't need to move him making it likely an overpay if you want to get him. He's still 24 and has a team option next season, so he still fits their timeline.

Yep, he boards his ass off and that would be his biggest super power but it's an impactful one. The other major positive is that the price tag to acquire would presumably not be anything crazy and as you said he does fit the timeline. The Nets did all the development work and we can reap the benefits as he goes into the prime of his career

Spida888 wrote:
Brinbe wrote:I'd much rather they just go get Day'Ron Sharpe if he's available. I don't think they need a high-volume/star level big like Davis/Sabonis, just someone that can do what Yak did, just with more availability.

And I think IQ is the victim of expectation as actually upgrading on him isn't necessarily as easy as it seems considering what he brings in terms of his shooting.

Agree that Sharpe can be a good get with low risk compared to some other big names. If we can get him for Ochai, Temple and SRPs, that'd be a small win.

With IQ I'd push back a little because it depends on whether we get a better overall PG than him. However, I don't think it's a rush we need to trade him this season. My general criticism of him is he's overpaid and is more of a combo guard that can't break down the defender 1-on-1. His shooting is welcome but can be streaky.


That's the thing, all the guards that are out there all have their warts (and are all probably worse shooters) and will want max money, so I don't know if that's worth it. The actual guards that would be upgrades aren't really guys that are available and I don't think IQ has been anywhere near bad enough that we should do a deal just to do it.

And I think it is notable that he's still managed to be a positive player despite slumping so that suggests that there is still some upside there that can tapped into when his game does turn around and he works past his current difficulties.


But, I'm saying why do the Nets need to trade him if he still is young enough for their rebuild?
User avatar
Brinbe
RealGM
Posts: 67,060
And1: 41,728
Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Location: Terana
         

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#507 » by Brinbe » Mon Jan 5, 2026 7:06 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
Brinbe wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Sharpe isn't anything amazing but they don't need to move him making it likely an overpay if you want to get him. He's still 24 and has a team option next season, so he still fits their timeline.

Yep, he boards his ass off and that would be his biggest super power but it's an impactful one. The other major positive is that the price tag to acquire would presumably not be anything crazy and as you said he does fit the timeline. The Nets did all the development work and we can reap the benefits as he goes into the prime of his career

Spida888 wrote:Agree that Sharpe can be a good get with low risk compared to some other big names. If we can get him for Ochai, Temple and SRPs, that'd be a small win.

With IQ I'd push back a little because it depends on whether we get a better overall PG than him. However, I don't think it's a rush we need to trade him this season. My general criticism of him is he's overpaid and is more of a combo guard that can't break down the defender 1-on-1. His shooting is welcome but can be streaky.


That's the thing, all the guards that are out there all have their warts (and are all probably worse shooters) and will want max money, so I don't know if that's worth it. The actual guards that would be upgrades aren't really guys that are available and I don't think IQ has been anywhere near bad enough that we should do a deal just to do it.

And I think it is notable that he's still managed to be a positive player despite slumping so that suggests that there is still some upside there that can tapped into when his game does turn around and he works past his current difficulties.


But, I'm saying why do the Nets need to trade him if he still is young enough for their rebuild?

Yeah, that's very true. It may well be Claxton, MPJ and Cam that gets dealt. But it's worth trying for since they do have other young bigs like Wolf/Clowney as well.

But it goes back to the same point as IQ, or the Nick Richards example which you go back to, where I'd rather they not make a trade for the heck of it but instead identify under-the-rader moves for the right players.
Image
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,987
And1: 5,301
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#508 » by TimeForChange » Mon Jan 5, 2026 10:30 pm

Read on Twitter
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 34,252
And1: 49,284
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#509 » by Tor_Raps » Mon Jan 5, 2026 10:44 pm

TimeForChange wrote:
Read on Twitter


Thats what being rumored going to Atlanta does to a mofo lol
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,987
And1: 5,301
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#510 » by TimeForChange » Mon Jan 5, 2026 10:51 pm

Read on Twitter
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,862
And1: 6,606
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#511 » by ArthurVandelay » Mon Jan 5, 2026 10:54 pm

Tor_Raps wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:
Read on Twitter


Thats what being rumored going to Atlanta does to a mofo lol


Everyone angling for leverage.

Dallas wants a haul.

Davis wants to get paid.

Atlanta wants to continue being notoriously cheap.
User avatar
LoveMyRaps
RealGM
Posts: 31,975
And1: 52,902
Joined: Jun 10, 2013
       

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#512 » by LoveMyRaps » Wed Jan 7, 2026 12:51 am

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=PSy3Ch7pvG4ybe2MpvWFcw
In Masai We Trust :meditate:
Image
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,987
And1: 5,301
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#513 » by TimeForChange » Wed Jan 7, 2026 1:32 am

AD doesn't want to play center so I don't see the point of trading for him.
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 34,252
And1: 49,284
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#514 » by Tor_Raps » Wed Jan 7, 2026 4:53 am

LoveMyRaps wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=PSy3Ch7pvG4ybe2MpvWFcw


So the Raptors think Poeltl might be damaged good but want another team to take him on for another 4 years in which he'll earn 28M for 3 of those years? Come on man lol
User avatar
Clutch0z24
RealGM
Posts: 10,382
And1: 10,324
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#515 » by Clutch0z24 » Wed Jan 7, 2026 5:05 am

Tor_Raps wrote:
LoveMyRaps wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=PSy3Ch7pvG4ybe2MpvWFcw


So the Raptors think Poeltl might be damaged good but want another team to take him on for another 4 years in which he'll earn 28M for 3 of those years? Come on man lol


We are not getting off Yak or IQ ....They will be stuck here unless we give up assets worth taking on them contracts....Yak won't pass a physical...His back is obviously a big issue.
Image
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,862
And1: 6,606
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#516 » by ArthurVandelay » Wed Jan 7, 2026 11:39 am

TimeForChange wrote:AD doesn't want to play center so I don't see the point of trading for him.


AD should have thought of that before "bulking up" to 268 this summer. :lol:
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,862
And1: 6,606
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#517 » by ArthurVandelay » Wed Jan 7, 2026 12:24 pm

Very interesting rumour leaks. Seems Raptors are mind-effing the Hawks? I'm sure Atlanta front office is having memories of last season with Raptors and Hawks vying for BI, Hawks lost out, and thus far it has worked out quite well for Toronto. Also Klutch reps both Davis and BI.
gpoon
Rookie
Posts: 1,005
And1: 744
Joined: Sep 10, 2015
 

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#518 » by gpoon » Wed Jan 7, 2026 2:10 pm

TGM wrote:
Clutch0z24 wrote:The one thing that annoys me about all the people that advocate for playing the middle.....Any player that is on the market "Sucks and we should not trade for"....Ball, No he sucks and is stupid don't want, Morant he sucks and is no good, AD too old and sucks, Sabonis sucks and bad....

I mean these are the reality of trades and players that you are most likely trading for when you have the limited assets like we have accumulated over the years....If you want to compete these are the type of players, Flawed stars you are trading for...

You can't be cheering for team mid while also not wanting to trade anyone and continue to build on two timelines, The Young rebuild timeline + the win now timeline....You have to pick a lane because trying to do both will end up in a bad result....

Playing the middle....Chances of you trading for a legit first option franchise player is most likely not happening so you can not be that picky....

And thats even if we have assets these teams even like....Being rumoured to these players means NOTHING in actual trade talks because these teams might hate what we have to offer...


Agree we shouldn’t be playing for the middle. Given that we have Scottie we aren’t going to tear it down and rebuild so it makes the whole direction pretty easy. The issue with most fans is people want top 10 players at top 30 value. Just doesn’t happen cause top 10 players rarely come on the market.

The Raps are not in a horrible situation, but also not in the best like a SA or OKC. Let me lay out realistic options on how they compete.

1. Push the chips in and mortgage the next 5-6 years on someone like Giannis. You pretty much hope Barnes, Giannis and Ingram along with some role players can win you a chip. It’s a strong team, but not sure if we are top 4 in the league. I would probably do it.

2. You trade for reclamation projects that are undervalued due to their team taking a different direction. Reclamation projects come in two groups, guys buried in depth and stars that are on teams just not looking to compete and need to fire sale. Sabonis, Ja, Sharpe, White, Monk, Kyrie, Gafford are some players that fall in that group. Just think when th Bulls dealt Markanen to the Jazz or when the Cavs dealt Sexton. These are quality players at fractional prices.

3. Value snipe as a 3rd team in big trades. Nets, OKC and Jazz are absolutely rapists when it comes to this. They always find a way to absorb large salaries that are partially reclamation projects with potential while gaining draft capital. They usually do it by cycling expiring contracts in return or provide cap space absorption.

4. Roll the dice on high risk high reward stars. Davis, Young, LaMelo. These are guys that come at a 50% discount because of injury, contract demands, etc… I personally feel this group you stay away unless it is 30 cents on the dollar.


Option 1 gives you the most certainty but if it fails you set the team back several years and will need to be ready for a full rebuild. It is a more sensible strategy for free agent attractive markets as even though they gift up assets they can always pick back up tier 1 players at no cost. Miami, GS, LA, NY are teams that fall in that category.

Option 2 is really what makes the most sense for the Raptors. Get a guy like Sabonis who won’t cost a kings ransom. You are a competitive playoff team. You bam on improvement across your roster and keep liquid enough to still pull off an option 1 move when ready.

Option 3 is another one, but it would need to be something where Giannis is going to NY and they need to move someone like Towns but the Bucks not wanting Towns and prefer pics and younger players back.

Option 4 is just not the type of deal we can risk unless the price is absolutely low. If it means giving up a few of our larger contracts, IQ, Jak and 1 first rounder and a bench player like Dick sure, but anything that needs two starters, 2 first a CMB and Dick should be avoided. Such a trade can absolutely blow up and the team is caught in limbo and out of assets to make a meaningful move going forward.


I’d argue Sabonis would cost more than anything Atlanta would want for Trae. Their salaries are similar, but you're locked into Sabonis longer, meaning you can’t just walk away next year if things don't work out. Plus, Sabonis is quite possibly the worst defensive center in the league.
Jerry Lucas
Starter
Posts: 2,029
And1: 2,006
Joined: Apr 01, 2021
     

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#519 » by Jerry Lucas » Wed Jan 7, 2026 2:16 pm

Ever since Stein reported that Rich Paul is high on the Hawks as the spot for AD to land, I've figured it's going to be them that ends up getting it done.

If I had to guess right now, I think Bobby's Plan B for the deadline after AD ends up on the Hawks is to figure out a way to bamboozle Scott Perry into reuniting with IQ and taking that contract off their hands (some kind of an IQ for Monk PG swap would be the base).
My Masai/Bobby-type FRP Barttorvik queries: 4/4, zero misses

Team Find The Next Superstar Closer
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,862
And1: 6,606
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Shams: Raps one of teams to pursue Anthony Davis 

Post#520 » by ArthurVandelay » Wed Jan 7, 2026 2:48 pm

Jerry Lucas wrote:Ever since Stein reported that Rich Paul is high on the Hawks as the spot for AD to land, I've figured it's going to be them that ends up getting it done.

If I had to guess right now, I think Bobby's Plan B for the deadline after AD ends up on the Hawks is to figure out a way to bamboozle Scott Perry into reuniting with IQ and taking that contract off their hands (some kind of an IQ for Monk PG swap would be the base).


When you consider the teams where IQ would fit (Atlanta is one), then consider the teams not looking to take on long term money (Atlanta now out), there aren't many landing spots out there for him. Sacramento might fit the bill. I'd take Monk to get off IQ.

Return to Toronto Raptors