Type of team we need

general · Post #1 » by **general** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:01 am

Look at Denver,Washington,Golden state,Orlando,Pheonix.They have shooters and play perimeter Ball They feed their Bigs every now and then but There are playmakers on those teams That is all we need..Instead we Force it to Eddy and Zach all game and cause turnovers or contested shots.we would be contenders with this team easy.

Zack Randolph
Balkman
For
Ridnour
Sczerbiak
1st round pick

Battier
For
jerome james
2nd round pick

Pg.Ridnour=8ppg,8 apg
Sg.Crawford= 20ppg,5 apg
Sf.Battier= 13ppg,6rpg
Pf.D.Lee= 9ppg,15 rpg
C.Eddy=15ppg,8 rpg

Post #2 » by **Manhattan Project** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:03 am

Battier for James? You serious? Sonics giving up a first round pick for Randolph? Dude...

siro · Post #3 » by **siro** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:05 am

WTF.......

king_k4life · Post #4 » by **king_k4life** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:06 am

Word the Rockets really want Jerome for one of their Key peices...

STFU and GTFOuttahere

general · Post #5 » by **general** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:07 am

There trying to trade Ridnour anyway and besides overrated rookie Durant They have no offense Zach would be another option and this deal can happen if isiah stops being stubborn...

god shammgod · Post #6 » by **god shammgod** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:09 am

oh boy

how bout we trade q-rich for artest straight up while we're at it and maybe we should get a pick from them too

general · Post #7 » by **general** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:11 am

This way chemistry is kept with the team and we get better,In a paper it stated ridnour,crawford,Brandon roy,martell webster and other sonics play pick up ball in the summer..

general · Post #8 » by **general** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:13 am

We can get artest cheaper then Q.Nate and Balkman can get us artest..Isiah is just to stubborn to do it..

god shammgod · Post #9 » by **god shammgod** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:41 am

general wrote:We can get artest cheaper then Q.Nate and Balkman can get us artest..Isiah is just to stubborn to do it..

is this thread sarcasm or what ? are you telling me that you would prefer to give up nate and balkman then q and you perceive q as having more value ? am i reading this right

king_k4life · Post #10 » by **king_k4life** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:42 am

general wrote:We can get artest cheaper then Q.Nate and Balkman can get us artest..Isiah is just to stubborn to do it..

Drugs are bad M'kay

Post #11 » by **GONYK** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 12:45 am

fryeguy · Post #12 » by **fryeguy** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 1:20 am

damn...there goes those brain cells..

randomhero423 · Post #13 » by **randomhero423** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 1:55 am

ban this fool

general · Post #14 » by **general** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 2:06 am

you guys are Dumb do you understand Artest said he will opt out and play here and he is currently having surgery on his arm Sacramento will lose him for nothing if they dont trade and they want Nate..

randomhero423 · Post #15 » by **randomhero423** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 2:11 am

battier for jerome james.

how the **** does that make sense.

Post #16 » by **moocow007** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 5:05 am

Please, please, PLEASE don't bring this to the Trade Board...I need my beauty sleep.

knicksNOTslick · Post #17 » by **knicksNOTslick** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 5:06 am

general = Isiah Thomas

it's definite now

PrecociousNeoph · Post #18 » by **PrecociousNeoph** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 5:15 am

randomhero423 wrote:battier for jerome james.

how the **** does that make sense.

i know. it's a totally lopsided trade...

..for the rockets.

teh savior cometh!!!

Post #19 » by **mjhp911** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 5:19 am

knicksNOTslick wrote:general = Isiah Thomas

it's definite now

Nah, he's Krok's younger brother.

Post #20 » by **NoLayupRule** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 8:56 am

general wrote:Battier
For
jerome james
2nd round pick

quote of the day!!!!