Bucks/Miami - 1/9

schweig · Post #61 » by **schweig** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:42 am

I guess they don't have more games in HD because they can't handle it. We still have SD and I guess it's going to be squished in sideways all night.

icat2000 · Post #62 » by **icat2000** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:42 am

Not one getting over-excited. Nor are we dismissing that without Redd Bucks are doomed to lose.

bigzy · Post #63 » by **bigzy** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:49 am

icat2000 wrote:Not one getting over-excited. Nor are we dismissing that without Redd Bucks are doomed to lose.

History tells you that your chances of winning are worse with Redd not playing than with him playing. This isn't saying that trading him and getting something in return might not be a gain but just playing Bell in his place isn't the answer.

trwi7 · Post #64 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:50 am

bigzy wrote:Ooops mean Charlotte. But when you add Philly the last 3 wins come against teams with a record of 34-69 so I wouldn't get too excited by their "success" without Redd.

Well I must say our success with Redd has been pretty awesome.

icat2000 · Post #65 » by **icat2000** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:54 am

bigzy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

History tells you that your chances of winning are worse with Redd not playing than with him playing. This isn't saying that trading him and getting something in return might not be a gain but just playing Bell in his place isn't the answer.

Always pays to look forward than constantly looking at what was. Learn from the past and develop for the future.

bigzy · Post #66 » by **bigzy** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:55 am

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Well I must say our success with Redd has been pretty awesome.

Make the comparision if you wish, it isn't that hard. We are not talking about whether Redd can lead a team to a championship, the point some are trying to make is that this team is better with Redd on the bench. If you want to make that argument you may need to get OJ's lawyers.

bigzy · Post #67 » by **bigzy** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:58 am

icat2000 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Always pays to look forward than constantly looking at what was. Learn from the past and develop for the future.

I hope LK doesn't think like some of you, if he does then he will be unemployed very soon. The past says this team is better with Redd, explain how you are building with Bell for the future.

WEFFPIM · Post #68 » by **WEFFPIM** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:05 am

bigzy wrote:Make the comparision if you wish, it isn't that hard. We are not talking about whether Redd can lead a team to a championship, the point some are trying to make is that this team is better with Redd on the bench. If you want to make that argument you may need to get OJ's lawyers.

Green font much?

icat2000 · Post #69 » by **icat2000** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:05 am

Nearly game time. Go Bucks, bring home the win

icat2000 · Post #70 » by **icat2000** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:10 am

Again what is with the crappy insipid intro music. Could it get anymore lame. Hardly upbeat.

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #71 » by **Buck You** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:10 am

Why are all those countries watching this game?

icat2000 · Post #72 » by **icat2000** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:12 am

Yi last three games 6/26. Lets hope he has a good game tonight offensively.

Simulack · Post #73 » by **Simulack** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:13 am

icat2000 wrote:Yi last three games 6/26. Lets hope he has a good game tonight offensively.

Eek, those are ugly, Charlie Bellish numbers.

trwi7 · Post #74 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:13 am

ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:Why are all those countries watching this game?

Uhh who wouldn't want to watch the Bucks? Even if you've never seen a basketball game you want to watch the Bucks.

trwi7 · Post #75 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:15 am

Look at all the scrubs at the end of the Miami bench. Oh a foul stand and wet your pants!

icat2000 · Post #76 » by **icat2000** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:15 am

Redd probably back for the Lakers game.

Simulack · Post #77 » by **Simulack** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:16 am

Any reason to wet your pants is a good one IMO.

trwi7 · Post #78 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:16 am

Simulack wrote:Any reason to wet your pants is a good one IMO.

That's why I signed up under peeyourpantsforthebrewers.com

trwi7 · Post #79 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:17 am

Eric Jensen sounds more alive than usual. Maybe they turned his microphone up.

Post #80 » by **blkout** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:18 am

Fast Starts 'R Us