ImageImage

Bucks-Hornets Postgame Thread 1/21/08

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#61 » by jerrod » Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:51 am

iveyfanclub wrote:Just an opinion, but I believe the Bucks are one of the worst teams I have seen at defending the pick and roll. Simply no effort to fight through a screen and no communication between the two defenders involved.



they aren't supposed to fight through it, the defense is based on them autoswitching
User avatar
iveyfanclub
Ballboy
Posts: 45
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 27, 2007
Location: Menomonie

 

Post#62 » by iveyfanclub » Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:55 am

jerrod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




they aren't supposed to fight through it, the defense is based on them autoswitching



And thats why we got Gadz on Chris Paul :nonono:
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,710
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#63 » by EastSideBucksFan » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:12 am

I watched the game on DVR afterwork tonight.

BTW, league pass is on free preview today and presumably thru the week for Time Warner customers.

I listened to the Hornets broadcast which is always really interesting.

They ripped on CV the entire game. I mean the entire game, one announcer kept mocking him "take another jumper Charlie NewCity".

He literally said "I don't put any value into a guy who's 6'11 and all he wants to do is take jumpshots. If that's all you're going to give me, then you're not worth very much."

Unlike many who undervalue Redd's contributions the Hornets announcers said "If anyone on the Bucks is going to get it done, it's Michael Redd. He's the only guy who can bring it every night on the offensive end"


As far as the game I thought we played a solid first half. We were getting consistently beaten on the offensive rebounds and couldn't seem to box out. The Hornets interior defense did a great job of not allowing the Bucks to get it to Bogut.

Redd played well within the flow of the game in the first half. Plenty of times though, when Redd gets the ball he is only looking to score. A couple of times he took it all the way up the floor, to Mo's dismay, an took it himself on the offensive end. He was doing a good job of mixing it up though, between perimeter jumpers and drives to the rim.

The second half they just seemed to go on a run. They started to run it more. Paul was finding Tyson Chandler for some big dunks. Chandler couldn't be stopped on the offense glass.

They were going to the rack and taking free throws. Both Peja and Mo Pete were on fire from outside. Once again poor perimeter defense.


Bogut was struggling to convert when he would get the ball inside. They were bring double teams on him and they were hounding him. A couple times Yi got the ball in the post and they immediately go to strip him.

Mo started finding his shot and Redd started to just take the ball. Villanueva was taking jumpers all day. I only saw him take it inside once out of probably twelve shots. He had a decent stat line, but his contributions weren't game changing.

Yi just looks lost out there. He's not even playing good defense anymore. Here and there he'll get a weakside block. But his inability to box out defenders is a real problem. I wanted Ruffin or Voskuhl to come in and try and box out Chandler earlier. I didn't think CV or Yi deserved too much time tonight.
User avatar
FoDrizzle
Sophomore
Posts: 171
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 26, 2007
Location: Celtics-hating

 

Post#64 » by FoDrizzle » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:15 am

After all the pathetically stupid game moments the Bucks' have had during the season, I have finally come to believe that LK is a terrible coach and a new, perhaps more veteran staff is needed.

Oh and, have the Bucks won a game yet after Redd returned?
03-13-2005: Donyell Marshall with 12 trays
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#65 » by xTitan » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:18 am

FoDrizzle wrote:After all the pathetically stupid game moments the Bucks' have had during the season, I have finally come to believe that LK is a terrible coach and a new, perhaps more veteran staff is needed.

Oh and, have the Bucks won a game yet after Redd returned?


They beat Atlanta with Redd but no Mo.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#66 » by jerrod » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:23 am

iveyfanclub wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




And thats why we got Gadz on Chris Paul :nonono:



yep
User avatar
stellation
RealGM
Posts: 15,953
And1: 9,442
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: *inaudible*

 

Post#67 » by stellation » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 am

EastSideBucksFan wrote:Unlike many who undervalue Redd's contributions the Hornets announcers said "If anyone on the Bucks is going to get it done, it's Michael Redd. He's the only guy who can bring it every night on the offensive end"

I'm not sure how much value we should place on the words of the NO commentators.
Mike X
Starter
Posts: 2,352
And1: 13
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Readin your posts and you dont even know it

 

Post#68 » by Mike X » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:39 am

stellation wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I'm not sure how much value we should place on the words of the NO commentators.


Lol, I was thinking the same thing. I think the "black hole" comment, if that was made, shows that they dont know what they're talking about.
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,576
And1: 174
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#69 » by fam3381 » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:48 am

FYI, I watched the game on LP and posted a recap over at BrewHoop.

http://www.brewhoop.com/story/2008/1/21/201416/589
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#70 » by europa » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:23 am

iveyfanclub wrote:Just an opinion, but I believe the Bucks are one of the worst teams I have seen at defending the pick and roll. Simply no effort to fight through a screen and no communication between the two defenders involved.


You're not the only one who shares that opinion. If you don't watch the Bucks it's impossible to believe how bad and how ignorant they are much of the time defensively. It really has to be seen to be believed. The problem is, the longer you watch them the more nauseated it becomes.

Unlike many who undervalue Redd's contributions the Hornets announcers said "If anyone on the Bucks is going to get it done, it's Michael Redd. He's the only guy who can bring it every night on the offensive end"


Redd was outstanding in the first quarter and very good in the first half. He was on the boards and made a few nice passes. But he was terrible in the second half. I think the one thing everyone will agree on is Redd is a terrific shooter but outside of one game, his shooting has been awful since his return. There's no reason for that to occur. The one constant in his game should be his shooting but it has gone south lately.
Nothing will not break me.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#71 » by xTitan » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:26 am

IMo the New Orleans announce crew was as bad as it gets, seems all there info was based on last year, not this year.
User avatar
Durbanfish4
Sophomore
Posts: 201
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 02, 2007
Location: Oconomowoc/Milwaukee

 

Post#72 » by Durbanfish4 » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:45 am

I'm not sure if anyone has posted this yet (if someone has, I apologize for reposting it), I find it very interesting that the Bucks' were 3-1 without Redd and when he finally did return they are a dismal 1-4. Of course it's sometimes foolish to draw inferences, but it is worth noting that the team seemed to function more like a unit without Redd.

I've been a huge Redd supporter up until this year...but, something really needs to change quickly. He may be a great human being and all that jazz, but when it comes to being smart on the basketball court he keeps demonstrating how inept he really is.
okanoho
Senior
Posts: 668
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

 

Post#73 » by okanoho » Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:25 am

MVP4Champ wrote:I'd take Chandler over Yi.


you talks BS
that's like I will take Lebron over Redd anyday
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,187
And1: 20,645
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

 

Post#74 » by AussieBuck » Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:32 am

stellation wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Excellent point. That has come back to annoy me a little because he made that comment and came across as a hard arse, but we haven't exactly been seeing an Ivey-Bell-man down-Ruffin-Bogut line up too much.

Hehehe.
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,401
And1: 1,446
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

 

Post#75 » by Sigra » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:34 am

Mo was not defending Paul for most of the night. But he was defending Paterson during that time when Paterson hit all that 3 pointers. Mostly because Mo Williams always have something better to do rather than being with his man. I watch him and he always has some "inteligent" idea what to do at defense and it is almost funny really. He leaves his man at the 3 point line and he is geting pose in the paint like some inteligent leader of defense. :rofl: I think that's how he get rest and save energy. I mean he can't be that stupid really.
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,401
And1: 1,446
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

 

Post#76 » by Sigra » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:38 am

midranger wrote:Just saw the highlights. Chris Paul standing at the top of the arc, lobs a pass to Tyson Chandler for the dunk. No Bucks within 5 feet. Times 2.

I could make those passes.

How about Bogut keeping his body on his guy?


Bogut defended West most of the night. It was coach decision that West is more dengerous scorer so Bogut was on West and CV or Yi or Gadz was on Chandler. Bogut played one of his best defansive games last night. Almost perfect honestly.
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,401
And1: 1,446
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

 

Post#77 » by Sigra » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:48 am

"Every game it's (one bad quarter)," said center Andrew Bogut, who had 15 rebounds. "I think our problem is when we force up shots or take quick shots like we did in the third, then every team we play gets their fast break going. In the third, they had a bunch of dunks, a bunch of transition plays, and the game was 15 points. And then you try and come back from that."
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#78 » by paul » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:35 am

Sigra wrote:"Every game it's (one bad quarter)," said center Andrew Bogut, who had 15 rebounds. "I think our problem is when we force up shots or take quick shots like we did in the third, then every team we play gets their fast break going. In the third, they had a bunch of dunks, a bunch of transition plays, and the game was 15 points. And then you try and come back from that."


So that makes one player on the team who's smart enough to see it then....
vlietinho
Veteran
Posts: 2,786
And1: 481
Joined: May 12, 2005
Location: The Netherlands
 

 

Post#79 » by vlietinho » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:56 am

to me it looked like they turned it up a notch defensively and our offense collapsed in the 3rd.

Bogut tried to play help defense, but then he didnt get any help. Same as the game before with Biedrins
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,401
And1: 1,446
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

 

Post#80 » by Sigra » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:28 pm

vlietinho wrote:
Bogut tried to play help defense, but then he didnt get any help. Same as the game before with Biedrins


Yup. 90% of times when his man score it was because Andrew had to help his pathetic guards and there was nobody behind Andrew to take his man. In that regard we miss Mason big time as Desmond was only one who was helping Bogut when Bogut help his "guards"

Return to Milwaukee Bucks