ImageImageImage

Wiretap says we're after Kidd. Do we trade Camby for him?

Moderator: THE J0KER

Do we trade Camby for Kidd?

yes
6
33%
no
12
67%
 
Total votes: 18

MELO4MVP
Banned User
Posts: 1,746
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 20, 2006

Wiretap says we're after Kidd. Do we trade Camby for him? 

Post#1 » by MELO4MVP » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:45 am

If not, whats the most you give up for him?
User avatar
eathy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,707
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 01, 2007

 

Post#2 » by eathy » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:48 am

i posted this in the acquire Kidd thread.

but i'd trade Camby and some fillers for Kidd only IF i get Josh Boone or Sean Williams in return.
Image
Image
Image
RRFB
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,900
And1: 2,334
Joined: Dec 24, 2006
Location: Denver, CO

 

Post#3 » by RRFB » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:49 am

I'd actually rather trade AI for Kidd than Camby, though I think I am more open about trading Iverson than most people here.
User avatar
djtruebeliever
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,297
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Location: between the click of the light and the start of the dream

 

Post#4 » by djtruebeliever » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:50 am

I know that Camby is the backbone of our D, but JKidd would totally disrupt the other teams offense by harassing the opposing teams pg. how many years are left on Camby's contract? because part of the problem is that we'd be basically renting Kidd. :dontknow: it's pretty close, but I lean a bit towards making the trade.
I'm in Kokokiko!
User avatar
djtruebeliever
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,297
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Location: between the click of the light and the start of the dream

 

Post#5 » by djtruebeliever » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:51 am

I'd rather give up AI than Camby.
I'm in Kokokiko!
MELO4MVP
Banned User
Posts: 1,746
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 20, 2006

 

Post#6 » by MELO4MVP » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:58 am

eathy wrote:i posted this in the acquire Kidd thread.

but i'd trade Camby and some fillers for Kidd only IF i get Josh Boone or Sean Williams in return.


Williams is a stud. You not getting Kidd and Williams for Camby.
User avatar
Teens On Acid
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,604
And1: 67
Joined: Jan 11, 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:
 

 

Post#7 » by Teens On Acid » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:02 am

i'd definintely take the chance.
why the hell not.
Kidd can help make up the boards.
all we'd miss are the blocks.
because Camby certainly doesn't offer anything resembling an offensive game.
AILebronMelo
Rookie
Posts: 1,207
And1: 4
Joined: Aug 01, 2004
Location: cali

 

Post#8 » by AILebronMelo » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:06 am

I dont think the Nets would be interested in Camby or AI seems like they would want to rebuild and get young talent and picks......Do Denver have all they picks coming up for the next few years?
Iverson, Iggy, Willie Green, Sammy D, Josh Smith, Rasheed and Ben Wallace, Larry Hughes Garnett, Francis, Lebron, Melo, K Mart, Wade, Amare, Q Richardson, T Mac, DC, and C Webb

Cryrak is a crybaby!
User avatar
JRMelo15
Rookie
Posts: 1,120
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Location: Denver

 

Post#9 » by JRMelo15 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:08 am

I'll give up Camby for sure, like I said in some other thread - we'll score 130 PPG, but we won't even have to get back on D.
Image
User avatar
JRmakes_it_rain
Pro Prospect
Posts: 845
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: The Fort CO.

 

Post#10 » by JRmakes_it_rain » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:13 am

The only trade that makes sense is AI, from a team standpoint, and a salary standpoint. Camby has been the most valuable player to date this season. Why would NJ want him? If anything they'd want to get younger.....another reason why they wouldn't take AI, I could only imagine, VC, RJ and AI....jesus the dribbling and shooting would be off the charts. If NJ could unload VC on somebody, which I don't see happening, then AI could atleast be a possibility. I don't like the idea of giving up any of our bigs for Kidd....we've all seen how good K-mart plays with J kidd. I think he would improve Nene greatly to. AI is the only thing that makes sense...period.
User avatar
JRmakes_it_rain
Pro Prospect
Posts: 845
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: The Fort CO.

 

Post#11 » by JRmakes_it_rain » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:28 am

the only way we could make a trade happen is getting a third team involved, don't know what a big like randolph makes....but AI to NY Z to NJ, Kidd to us....just an idea, on what I think it could take....its gonna take a big salary, I don't think our FO would like having all these big salaries.....one has to go, or we have no depth at all.
User avatar
Shady08
Pro Prospect
Posts: 808
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 27, 2007
Location: Fort Collins, CO

 

Post#12 » by Shady08 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:30 am

I think AI and Camby must stay.
User avatar
nets150551
Freshman
Posts: 97
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2007

 

Post#13 » by nets150551 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:32 am

New Jersey Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +15.8 ppg, -6.6 rpg, and -2.7 apg.
Incoming Players
J.R. Smith
6-6 SG from St. Benedict's Prep (HS)
9.6 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 1.7 apg in 18.1 minutes
Allen Iverson
6-0 SG from Georgetown
27.0 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 6.9 apg in 41.8 minutes
Outgoing Players
Bostjan Nachbar
6-9 PF from Slovenia (Foreign)
9.5 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 0.9 apg in 20.9 minutes
Jason Kidd
6-4 PG from California
11.3 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 10.4 apg in 37.3 minutes
mabey nj gets a pick

Denver Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: -15.8 ppg, +6.6 rpg, and +2.7 apg.
Incoming Players
Bostjan Nachbar
6-9 PF from Slovenia (Foreign)
9.5 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 0.9 apg in 20.9 minutes
Jason Kidd
6-4 PG from California
11.3 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 10.4 apg in 37.3 minutes
Outgoing Players
J.R. Smith
6-6 SG from St. Benedict's Prep (HS)
9.6 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 1.7 apg in 18.1 minutes
Allen Iverson
6-0 SG from Georgetown
27.0 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 6.9 apg in 41.8 minutes

i would love the idea of haveing iverson in nj, he could run around take as many shots as he wants and mabey it would work out better with 3 ball hogs in nj :wink:
User avatar
JRmakes_it_rain
Pro Prospect
Posts: 845
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: The Fort CO.

 

Post#14 » by JRmakes_it_rain » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:34 am

Shady08 wrote:I think AI and Camby must stay.


then find a trade that works.....salary wise....this isn't nba live 08.....we're gonna have to give up either or....I think Nene is too much of a question mark for a team to take on right now.....where else is the salary gonna come from? NJ sure doesn't want Kmart back without J Kidd, they know his contract is awful.
User avatar
nets150551
Freshman
Posts: 97
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2007

 

Post#15 » by nets150551 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:35 am

oh yea also if kidd and martin got to a champion ship kidd, melo, martin, camby would be really good
User avatar
elbowthrower
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,788
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

 

Post#16 » by elbowthrower » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:45 am

I'd rather not trade anyone for Kidd, unless it were a steal. Keep AI and Camby for now.
User avatar
JRmakes_it_rain
Pro Prospect
Posts: 845
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: The Fort CO.

 

Post#17 » by JRmakes_it_rain » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:50 am

indiana could be a good third team as well, they would obviously part ways with JO, and his huge contract........
RRFB
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,900
And1: 2,334
Joined: Dec 24, 2006
Location: Denver, CO

 

Post#18 » by RRFB » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:54 am

Our FO made it clear we wouldn't be trading for Kidd without dumping either Kmart's or Iverson's salary.
ambiglight
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,367
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 03, 2007

 

Post#19 » by ambiglight » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:54 am

JRmakes_it_rain wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



then find a trade that works.....salary wise....this isn't nba live 08.....we're gonna have to give up either or....I think Nene is too much of a question mark for a team to take on right now.....where else is the salary gonna come from? NJ sure doesn't want Kmart back without J Kidd, they know his contract is awful.


najera, smith and nene works. denver doesnt have anything to offer that can fix NJ in the short term. They should be trying to move vince not J kidd. But denver would be foolish to make a lateral trade with NJ when NJ doesnt have any real leverage.
User avatar
JRmakes_it_rain
Pro Prospect
Posts: 845
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: The Fort CO.

 

Post#20 » by JRmakes_it_rain » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:58 am

True point guards that are hall of famers don't get traded.......how would we get better by sacrificing young talent in Nene and Smith, and a guy that has said he'd resign here for cheap in Najera.....our starting five can't play the whole game....the bench is almost as important as the starters....well on a team where the coach utilizes the bench anyway.

Return to Denver Nuggets