exkonvict wrote:lol@Raptors Defense.
If we had any defense to laugh at I would too...
And Kobe = Jordan...
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Jordan23Forever wrote:I calculated them myself, albeit crudely. It's an approximation that should be valid within reason; moreover, whatever errors inhere in this formula should hold in both scenarios (then vs. now). Here's how I estimate possessions:
FGA + (FTA/2)
Same for players and teams. I'll respond more thoroughly later.
JordansBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually your boy Bgil and G35 said something untrue and I entered.
JordansBulls wrote:The league was the strongest in the 90's.
MartyConlonJr wrote:I got curious and checked out which teams he has scored 40 points on. The yahoo site only goes back to 99-00 season, but before that he was only averaging 19.9 ppg in 98-99, so i assume that I've written down all his 40+ games. It includes playoffs though, which I don't think were counted in the OP's numbers. Funnily enough (and unless he scored 40+ on them in hist first 3 seasons) the only team in the league he hasn't dropped 40 on is Atlanta.
7 times - Seattle, Golden State, Houston
6 times - Phoenix, Sacramento
5 times - LA Clippers, San Antonio, Utah
4 times - Dallas, Denver, Memphis, New York, Portland, Toronto
3 times - Boston, Washington
2 times - Minnesota, Philadelphia
1 time, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Indiana, Miami, Milwaukee, New Jersey, Orlando
Never - Atlanta
High 5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That's really funny because when I was watching the highlights of that Raptors game and I saw his 40+ stat I was trying to remember a game where Kobe was unconscious against the Hawks and I couldn't think of one. Now I know why.
JordansBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually your boy Bgil and G35 said something untrue and I entered.
G35 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually you just don't like hearing the truth and then you go on your biased contentions.
Point blank questions would Michael 30 ppg playing with Shaq. Would Michael have as many 40 point games playing with Shaq.
Answer that with yes or no and not some statistical rant and we'll see whether you can be honest or not......
G35 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Point blank questions would Michael 30 ppg playing with Shaq.
Would Michael have as many 40 point games playing with Shaq.
Umm, considering that Kobe, a much less efficient player, averaged 30 ppg one year and 28.5 ppg another year alongside Shaq, I see no reason why Jordan wouldn't have averaged at least 30. Why do you think he wouldn't have, given these facts?
JordansBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually your boy Bgil and G35 said something untrue and I entered.
Bgil wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
bull. I didn't say anything untrue. I just said something that didn't paint Jordan as GOD and you took issue with it. Jordan played in an era of no defense and super-scoring... not totally unlike Wilt. That inflated his stats just like it did everyone else in that era. Live with it. Jordan's not coming back.
Bgil wrote:I don't see Jordan doing either as well as Kobe.
But the larger issue here is why you keep trying to say Jordan would have done x in this era despite the fact that he didn't do it in his era (the era of run and gun... no defense etc).
Jordan's not playing now and never will again. You just sound like all those Wilt fanatics that believe he would have been just as dominant today as he was when they're were only 12-16 teams.
Jordan23Forever wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Jordan would still do what he did back then. There are perimeter players today (e.g., Kobe/Lebron) who can approximate his production and/or impact, but they're not him as a total package (Lebron has the production, Kobe has the defense and clutchness). So in that sense he wouldn't be as unique, but he wouldn't be viewed as any less of a player, since it was what he did on the court -- not his uniqueness as a perimeter player -- that made him what he is, and what the majority of fans (save for Bilge and G35) believe him to be, which is at worst a top 3 player all time.
I know it must burn.
tkb wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Why don't you just use Usage rate instead of that formula (which is incredibly flawed IMO)?
Using usage rate, Kobe's 2nd most prolific season when it comes to percentage of team possessions used is less prolific than Jordan's 7th most prolific one.
Now, having a high usage rate isn't a bad thing. You generally want the ball in the hands of your best player. Having said that I don't think using FG + FT/2 is the best way to gauge this. You miss out on and 1s, extra ft when you get fouled on a 3, assists and turnovers.