Post#32 » by custodianrules2 » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:13 pm
I think Jim Barnett became a great announcer for the Warriors once 2 things happened:
1.) He started calling the game at hand rather than endlessly singing Dunleavy Jr.'s praises when the guy hadn't done anything significant yet or in a long while.
2.) He started talking about players that fans of all ages should be familar with. For instance, I may know such players like Connie Hawkins and Elvin Hayes, but lots of people at home are probably thinking, who the f---k are they?
For the most part, Barnett calls everything like he sees it, which is mostly accurate. He keep Fitz in check because Fitz is a super homer. It's not like Fitz is a bad announcer per se, but his comments get a little stale/annoying just like how Barnett use to mention Dunleavy as either struggling or he dribbles and passes the ball very well for a man 6'10. Yes, we know! We also know he can't shoot worth crap when it's an open look, and yet the Barnett defensive comments come out like no other player when he misses a bucket. It's like Barnett was secretly Jr's real dad.
So now that we're winning and we actually have forwards that can deliver, Barnett is a superb Warriors announcer. He calls the plays accurately, he gives insight about what might happen, he gives insight about how the nba is because he was a former player,and he analyzes the game better than Fitz.
Fitz doesn't bring much of that same perspective as Barnett, but he does bring a lively voice. I just wish he weren't such a homer or start complaining about things that aren't relevant or accurate to what is really happening in the game. Why complain about something earlier in the game or something that was the correct call. Fans can complain about that, but the announcers should just call the game or give info on the players and how they've been doing in the last few games. Information from announcers is good.
*** GET IN ON THE ACTION! NEVER BEFORE SEEN FOOTAGE! ***
Warrior Fans Everywhere Rule!