Blazers @ T-Wolves

d-train · Post #41 » by **d-train** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:47 am

I think klinky's chatroom is perfect without censorship.

Klinky · Post #42 » by **Klinky** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:05 am

TBpup>> I don't really want to have censorship enabled on the chatroom as I am probably the biggest offender. However, I definitely don't want the chatroom to degenerate into mindless drivel. I like that you're inviting people to the chat, though I can't guarantee that minors won't have to answer to their parents, but I'll definitely keep this in mind going forward. Mainly I don't want the chat to have a bunch of people arguing with each other over really stupid stuff or acting like jerks. Cursing and stuff I feel goes with part of my enjoyment of the game, different strokes for different folks. I can't really guarantee a PG-13 environment though.

As for moderation of the chat it's a tricky situation. I can set people up as ops on the channel, which grants them kick & ban abilities. The problem is that a /kick only kicks them out of the room and they can just reload the website and come back in. A /ban only bans them via a cookie in their web browser, they can clear their cookies and come right back in, so I've devised an ip ban script. It's not integrated into the chat so there is no command on the chat that I can use, I have to edit the script by hand on the web server server to actually ban someone completely from the chat. So I would hate to dish out responsibility with a broken power system.

What I am planning is to renovate or upgrade the chat system over the summer when there's not so much action, people hate having the chat down during games and there will be a lot of them coming up. So maybe starting around late April(if we don't make the Playoffs) I can get to work on figuring out how to get a more flexible site up and running.

TradeMachine · Post #43 » by **TradeMachine** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:13 am

Anyone watching the Wolves' broadcast?

The halftime dude just said the following: "If I see that Oden needs a MF surgery going into the draft, I don't take him in the top 20."

huh?

Khazim · Post #44 » by **Khazim** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:17 am

TradeMachine wrote:Anyone watching the Wolves' broadcast?

The halftime dude just said the following: "If I see that Oden needs a MF surgery going into the draft, I don't take him in the top 20."

huh?

Well, they also said that right now Roy is better, but that's just cause Foye hasn't had the opportunity to play. Ironic.

Post #45 » by **Mr Odd** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:20 am

The Blazers on the offensive side, their few sets
and or plays (if you call them that) have vanished
& they seem to be a bunched together with no room
to move and little to no ball movement.. .Uuuhhgg!!

Post #46 » by **Spykes** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:21 am

TradeMachine wrote:Anyone watching the Wolves' broadcast?

The halftime dude just said the following: "If I see that Oden needs a MF surgery going into the draft, I don't take him in the top 20."

huh?

And people say our announcers are homers... :roll:

TradeMachine · Post #47 » by **TradeMachine** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:25 am

Where is Joel? Our interior D is garbage, and our best defender is on the bench in place of Charmin?

slaman · Post #48 » by **slaman** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:36 am

Al Jefferson loses his pants
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4E7mRAK-O0

We can't hank the Spandex Gods enough. Download link: http://www.sendspace.com/file/g2rng3

d-train · Post #49 » by **d-train** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:41 am

Oh my, a wardrobe malfunction, I

swede · Post #50 » by **swede** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:47 am

Man, did anyone catch Wheels and Tone talking about Jay Jensen kissing Pryz's bare butt? Tone was going off about putting steak sauce, hot sauce, cayenne pepper etc. on his ass to make it taste better or something. I was just like WTF..

d-train · Post #51 » by **d-train** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:51 am

swede wrote:Man, did anyone catch Wheels and Tone talking about Jay Jensen kissing Pryz's bare butt? Tone was going off about putting steak sauce, hot sauce, cayenne pepper etc. on his ass to make it taste better or something. I was just like WTF..

This is what you get when company stooges replace Steve Jones.

UGotThrilled · Post #52 » by **UGotThrilled** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:01 am

What happened to the chat room link? can somebody post it?

Post #53 » by **Spykes** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:06 am

UGotThrilled wrote:What happened to the chat room link? can somebody post it?

Check out Klinky's signature for the link.

Post #54 » by **Spykes** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:15 am

Roy's fake/crossover move is a thing of beauty. It never gets old. :clap:

TradeMachine · Post #55 » by **TradeMachine** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:21 am

Even if I've seen it time and time again, I still love it when Roy breaks down his defender to score in crunch time.

Post #56 » by **Mr Odd** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:23 am

Nate did MUCH better this game with his
lineups & when he played players at the
correct times. Very good play out of the
timeout with the Roy going to left and Jones
coming off a screen then hitting the three ball.

Joel did great in the 4th.. . :wink:

The offense was spaced much better
when the correct people were playing.

J~Rush · Post #57 » by **J~Rush** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:23 am

Blake was +16 for the game and Jack was -9. That's a differential of 25 points between the two.

Pinot love · Post #58 » by **Pinot love** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:24 am

^ yes he did to a MUCH better job. My only thoughts were " yeay no Jack" and "awe not so much travis, but I understand". Other than that it seemed like a solid coach was making the decisions.

TradeMachine · Post #59 » by **TradeMachine** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:33 am

I loved that decoy play with Jones getting the three at the end, and I loved Jack not playing as much in the fourth.

Good work, Nate. *shudder*

Post #60 » by **Mr Odd** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:36 am

J~Rush wrote:Blake was +16 for the game and Jack was -9. That's a differential of 25 points between the two.

HAHA - When you put that in the chat room & almost spit up my drink.