Who wins in 7: Lakers or Suns

That Nicka · Post #101 » by **That Nicka** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:09 pm

[quote="dcash4"][/quote]

Historically, Lamar sucks as a 2nd option.. He has played great recently however...

Post #102 » by **dockingsched** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:32 pm

its irrelevant to a discussion as to why they beat the jazz/mavs and lost to the grizzlies/bobcats. its been all about defense. has nothing to do with lamar being the 2nd option.

G35 · Post #103 » by **G35** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:45 pm

JordansBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That's what I don't get. You beat good teams without them but can't beat bad teams?

It should be the other way around.

You should watch the games and not on the boxscores...you would be less confused......

JordansBulls · Post #104 » by **JordansBulls** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:50 pm

G35 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

You should watch the games and not on the boxscores...you would be less confused......

I have and the reason they win or lose is because of bench play.

Post #105 » by **dockingsched** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:53 pm

first you have no idea why they beat the jazz/mavs on the road and lost to the bobcats/grizz but then you recognize its bench play. they're bench players because they are inconsistent, especially when asked to do a lot more than they should be. ronny should barely be getting off the bench, sasha and farmar are being asked to carry some of the offensive load, dj mbenga is being given consistent minutes after being out of the league for half the yr. luke and vlad are being asked to defend super athletic sf's.

That Nicka · Post #106 » by **That Nicka** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:00 pm

JordansBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I have and the reason they win or lose is because of bench play.

lol wtf

-SDU- · Post #107 » by **-SDU-** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:03 pm

if the playoffs started today this would be the first round matchup

:pray:

that would be AWESOME!

Serpo · Post #108 » by **Serpo** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:39 pm

I can't see the Lakers beating the Suns or any other serious contender this year . I just don't think they'll get healthy enough .

Post #109 » by **Young_Star11** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:42 pm

Right now: Suns in 5

Both teams at their 'peak': Lakers in 7

This season in the playoffs: Suns in 7

Bucs80 · Post #110 » by **Bucs80** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:38 am

When Both Healthy Lakers would win in 6

Illuminati · Post #111 » by **Illuminati** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:13 am

LAKERS/SUNS IN 7. DISCUSS FANS.

NapoleonII · Post #112 » by **NapoleonII** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:18 am

Young_Star11 wrote:Right now: Suns in 5

Both teams at their 'peak': Lakers in 7

This season in the playoffs: Suns in 7

That Nicka · Post #113 » by **That Nicka** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:20 am

Young_Star11 wrote:Right now: Suns in 4

Both teams at their 'peak': Lakers in 4

This season in the playoffs: Lakers in 6

NapoleonII · Post #114 » by **NapoleonII** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:22 am

I guess the truth hurts?

That Nicka · Post #115 » by **That Nicka** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:29 am

NapoleonII wrote:I guess the truth hurts?

What's the truth? That the Suns would win just because you think so?

NapoleonII · Post #116 » by **NapoleonII** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:55 am

No, but that the lakers will be held back by injuries this year. A team always gets screwed every year...

PopAGat · Post #117 » by **PopAGat** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:58 am

Lakers.

That Nicka · Post #118 » by **That Nicka** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:23 am

NapoleonII wrote:No, but that the lakers will be held back by injuries this year. A team always gets screwed every year...

I guess we shouldnt even bother playing anymore since you obviously know how things are going to turn out then...

Post #119 » by **SOUL** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:26 am

Fully healthy = Lakers 6

NapoleonII · Post #120 » by **NapoleonII** » Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:39 am

Lol calm the **** down. I'm predicting the lakers won't be at full strength for the playoffs. Argue all you want, I really couldn't care less.