ImageImageImage

Offseason Question: Can we really trade Ray Allen?

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

LarryBrdismyDad
Sophomore
Posts: 236
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 14, 2007

 

Post#41 » by LarryBrdismyDad » Fri May 16, 2008 6:31 pm

eitanr wrote:The Denver idea really seems like the most realistic logical move I have heard. The Nuggets have Nene and could get a defensive big off their bench (Diop MLE) to complete their roster. Adding a shooter as deadly as Allen could work alongside AI and Camby...let's see what the trade board thinks.

As for Boston this would solve the backup big issue as well with Perk filling in that role. I see Smith as being a nice backup wing with the potential for greater things. His shooting has improved though.

The Bulls deal would be Hughes + Gooden + 9th pick or something resembling that...perhaps Noch + Hughes for Allen.

The Noch version makes a lot more sense. The Bulls have enough small forwards and would rather deal Noch away. They also have enough rooks as previously mentioned. The only thought to this is if there really is someone special there at 9.

The whole notion of seeing in past drafts who was there and who wasn't is pretty nonsensical. It all depends on that year's draft. This particular draft is supposedly a deep one. The C's could get some nice potential players with the pick. It depends on if they want a potential wing or big...they should be able to choose between Batum, Love, Arthur and other likely candidates who could be there at 9.


That Denver deal looks sick. Thats the reason I started this thread to get some good ideas out there because I couldn't really think of any but I didn't think of the sign and trade route. I think this deal is a steal for Boston. JR Smith has big time potential and averages 12 ppg already in like 22 to 25 mins of play a night. He is only 22 yrs old and has huge potential. I think he will avg 20 a game in the future and he can go off for 30 something any night. Camby would be the perfect big man for our team. Camby can shoot the midrange jumper and thats what we need our center to do so people can't double team the ball on pick and rolls (like they do now with Perkins). Camby is also a great help side defender and a pretty good low post defender as well to go along with being an excellent offensive rebounder.

Odds of the Deal: I really can't make any odds on this deal right now. I don't know what direction Denver is headed in. I don't know how much Denver likes Smith but he should take over for Iverson in a yr or so because hes aging and will be done in a few yrs. For some reason I can't see the Nuggets giving up Camby. He is signed to a reasonable contract for the next 2 yrs and I think they would try to get us to take on Nene or Martin. Even if they made us take one of them I would have to think about it because Smith is already better then Allen next yr. Smith would just need to fit in and play defense which are his two question marks.

That Chicago deal I wouldn't do. Hughes and Gooden is crap for Ray Allen. The #9 pick is a nice piece but doesn't get us to a title in the next couple of yrs which is the goal here. ParticleMan mentioned Gordon for Ray Allen in a sign and trade which is interesting. Gooden would have to be added for salary reasons. I would have to see what kind of contract Gordon wants but that is a pretty good idea as well. Gordon can create his own shot, is a clutch shooter, and is still young at 25 yrs old. He is undersized and I don't think he plays good defense but in our system he will become sufficient.

Odds of the Deal: I can't see Chicago doing this because they should be rebuilding with young pieces like Gordon and not bringing in vets like Allen. They are nowhere near contending and they should be trying to trade hughes this summer for an expiring next yr. The core of that team for the future should be Hinrich-Gordon-Deng-Thomas-Noah with that #9 pick factoring in the mix as well. Kevin Love would look really good there as they have zero interior scooring and hes the best interior scorer outside of Beasley and Brook Lopez in the draft.

The Kirilenko and Brewer deal for Ray Allen I don't think Utah would do that. They already lack a perimeter stopper as everyone has seen in the Lakers series with Kobe tearing them up. If they did this deal they would be trading 2 of their better defenders for a guy who is just a jump shooter at this point. Utah also already plays bad defense. This trade just makes them worse in my opinion. Ray Allen would be the #4 option there too so he wouldnt be scoring a lot either to offset all the lost depth and perimeter defense.

Any other trade ideas?
User avatar
Collinto
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,601
And1: 25
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#42 » by Collinto » Fri May 16, 2008 6:53 pm

LarryBrdismyDad wrote:Odds of the Deal: I really can't make any odds on this deal right now. I don't know what direction Denver is headed in. I don't know how much Denver likes Smith but he should take over for Iverson in a yr or so because hes aging and will be done in a few yrs. For some reason I can't see the Nuggets giving up Camby. He is signed to a reasonable contract for the next 2 yrs and I think they would try to get us to take on Nene or Martin. Even if they made us take one of them I would have to think about it because Smith is already better then Allen next yr. Smith would just need to fit in and play defense which are his two question marks.


It is tough to put odds on a deal, because really we have no idea what GM's and coaches really thinks of guys. But there is no doubt that Denver is in a position that needs to be shaken up. There are Carmelo rumors, but again, is sounds like sports writers trying to be interesting more than reality...and it usually takes a few years for a guy like that to actually get moved, if ever (ie, KG, AI, Kobe). So who do they move? Kenyon Martin isn't bringing much in return. Nene is the classic, worth more to us than what someone is going to trade for him...if he is healthy he could be a beast, but the risk is too much to get much value for him. AI is not an easy guy to trade, just ask Philly. Camby is old, in NBA years, has a reasonable contract an can contribute to a team looking to win today. So I think by default, he is the guy to dangle to shake things up.

As far as JR Smith, I would imagine that Denver wouldn't want to trade him, but are they willing to pony up 40-50 mill over the next 5-6 years to keep him? And does Camby and the 20th pick bring enough in return to make a difference? They very well may have him as untouchable...He undoubtedly has the big P word. I do think that Denver, imo, would want more to make the deal work...
RayAllen#34
Sophomore
Posts: 100
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 20, 2008

 

Post#43 » by RayAllen#34 » Fri May 16, 2008 6:56 pm

As a Ray Allen fan that has followed him since he was drafted by Milwaukee, i think it would be best for the Celtics to trade him. He doesn't fit in their system at all, and as a result only a third of his skills are actually being put to use. He's good at catching and shooting, but prefers to shoot off the dribble. All he's basically used as is a catch and shoot type player. There are several players in the league that can fill that role for less than a third of his salary. Either change the system so that ray can actually produce better (eg. pass the frikken ball to him when he's open, run a play or two for him) or trade him.
Image
Hemingway
Banned User
Posts: 3,725
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

 

Post#44 » by Hemingway » Fri May 16, 2008 7:23 pm

a few thoughts...

When looking at trading Ray, we need to look at the realistic parameters of any trade; what are our needs? I think we go one of 2 ways:
1. Trade Ray for another star player. Someone in a bad situation that would work for us, and is hopfully a but younger.
2. Trade Ray for prospects.

What we are not going to do is trade him for a couple of so so players. Guys like Curry and Crawford, no way. These guys are barely above a MLE value to us.

What we need to consider is that we are a prime MLE free agent destination. So any trade must yield someone much better then what we can get for the MLE.

Another note...
We need to think of Ray as a lotto ticket with many chances to be cashed in. We cna trade him as an expiring and pronbably get more value for him. There is also a small small chance we could do a sign and trade for somethink like a 1 year deal at big money to match salery in a trade.
hiphop1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 32
Joined: Aug 08, 2005
Location: hudson nh

 

Post#45 » by hiphop1 » Fri May 16, 2008 7:58 pm

I like the NY deal if it is Curry and Crawford for Allen.

Curry/Perk
KG/Powe
PP/Posey
Crawford/Bill Walker
Rondo/Pruitt

That would be my lineup. Curry gives us the low post scorer I think we desperatly need and the way Ray was used this year there would be no drop off by aquiring Crawford.
Free your mind and your a** will follow
User avatar
Pogue Mahone
Head Coach
Posts: 6,006
And1: 738
Joined: Aug 09, 2003
Location: In the Sun
Contact:
     

 

Post#46 » by Pogue Mahone » Fri May 16, 2008 10:43 pm

As far as the Knicks are concerned, if Marbury doesn't opt-out (he would be foolish to leave $19M+ on the table), I wouldn't be against a Chandler, Balkman and Marbury package for Scals, Baby and Ray Ray.

Marbury is an expiring if he doesn't opt-out. He is a cancer, yes, but his contract itself has value. The Knicks would be silly to let go of Chandler and Balkman, imo. Balkman can play the Marion to D'Antoni's system, imo. Chandler is a good-to-very good prospect, imo.

In my mind's eye, Balkman would be the heir apparent to Posey. Yes, he doesn't have the outside shot but he is a very good offensive rebounder who can legitimately cover a lot of PFs, SFs and most SGs. In a lot of ways, he reminds me of Dennis Rodman, without the quirkiness.

I would look to flip Marbury and the possibilities are endless. I am kind of partial to Memphis for Mike Miller and Jason Collins. Boston would likely have to add something but that's just picking nits. Collins could be retained as a lane-clogger (which he is very good at) or he could be moved in a package for Nene (my choice) or similar priced player.

One player that I would ecstatic to get for the Celtics is Francisco Garcia in Sacramento. He has good handles, can hit the spot up three off the catch and is a good team defender/slightly above average man defender. I would absolutely love if the Celtics could insert him into the starting lineup with Rondo, Pierce, Garnett and Perkins. That lineup would be nasty defensively and I don't see the offense falling off much from what we witnessed in this year's regular season. In fact, I think there is a chance that overall offense would be improved.
User avatar
grantlongforpresident
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,055
And1: 124
Joined: Jul 30, 2004

 

Post#47 » by grantlongforpresident » Fri May 16, 2008 11:04 pm

Ray is slumping a little, and everyone wants to trade him.

this is just sad.
User avatar
armageddon
Rookie
Posts: 1,168
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2006

 

Post#48 » by armageddon » Sat May 17, 2008 4:48 am

Ray probably can play a few more quality years but he's just not a winner and never has been. Wimpy fouls, no attitude, got mad a KG for cursing, NEEDS PLAYS RUN FOR HIM, cannot dribble out of a double team, doesn't rebound, doesn't get assists, is deathly afraid of contact, is not a leader, but a very good regular season player.
One more year then his contract will be traded.
Fortunately, Boston will be a destination for free agents for a couple more years and we have the full MLE.
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

 

Post#49 » by GuyClinch » Sat May 17, 2008 4:59 am

Shoot Ray up with some winstrol and some human growth hormone and suddenly the old ray will return. :P Hey it worked for the Yankees.
User avatar
armageddon
Rookie
Posts: 1,168
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2006

 

Post#50 » by armageddon » Sat May 17, 2008 5:03 am

I do have a hard time watching a guy who looks like he shaves himself from head to toe.
omegatronic3
Junior
Posts: 432
And1: 5
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#51 » by omegatronic3 » Sat May 17, 2008 5:11 am

what happened to ray allen..........I havent watched you much but in this series Allen sucks....this guy used to be the best shooter in the game but he cant knock down a shot....he doesnt seem to have any lift either. Is he just having a bad series or has he sucked all season? Hes being guarded by Wall for crying out loud.....I know the Cavs D is pretty good but youd think he could get past wally. You guys need some post play..I dont think ive seen you score on anything but a jumper.
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

 

Post#52 » by GuyClinch » Sat May 17, 2008 6:15 am

It really is a mystery. Ray had more lift and more athleticism in his game earlier in the year. I don't know what's wrong with him. He has got nothing right now. I think he must have some undisclosed physical problem.

Sure you age - but he has fallen off the map..

Pete
ShaqSlamsU
Banned User
Posts: 12,552
And1: 14
Joined: Dec 17, 2001

 

Post#53 » by ShaqSlamsU » Sat May 17, 2008 6:25 am

who would want a gimp like ray ray? Honestly, does any team want to trade anything of value for him right now in his career? :)

Return to Boston Celtics