ImageImageImage

The Retooling Thread: What do we do now

Moderators: KingDavid, QUIZ, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, heat4life

User avatar
DayofMourning
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,012
And1: 93,190
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
       

 

Post#1001 » by DayofMourning » Wed May 21, 2008 9:41 pm

heat4life wrote:Someone on the Bulls board suggested:

Hinrich + Nocioni + Gooden

for

Marion + Blount

Thoughts?


The only player I like a lot from the Bulls in that deal would be Hinrich. I believe Marion can fetch more in a trade. Also, his expiring contract could be huge for us. Much more than anything that deal would allow.
kundanp333
Freshman
Posts: 53
And1: 6
Joined: May 18, 2008

Sign Ricky Buckets? for cheap! 

Post#1002 » by kundanp333 » Wed May 21, 2008 9:46 pm

I know its been asked before, but the question can be answered in a different way due to attaining the 2nd overall pick.

What can be afforded to sign ricky with? the heat organization know he cant be signed for much... and i think its about time ricky knows he s gotta play for cheap to win... maybe he realizes every team he joins ends up not doing well and he s ready to give a good run with wade and company.

What do you guys think? How much should we take him for?
User avatar
DayofMourning
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,012
And1: 93,190
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
       

 

Post#1003 » by DayofMourning » Wed May 21, 2008 10:07 pm

Not interested in Ricky. I don't like his game at all. He's a free bird for all I care.
User avatar
CRHeel94
Junior
Posts: 350
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 03, 2007

 

Post#1004 » by CRHeel94 » Wed May 21, 2008 10:08 pm

I'm pretty happy with the second pick. Either Beasley or Rose will be a great addition. Who we take, though, has a cascade effect on the roster. At the end of the day by summer 09 we have to have a clear Top 3 that includes at least one perimeter guy, one legit big man and a third AllStar type. Then you surround that top 3 with a solid supporting cast which could include some guys currently on the roster.

If the pick is Rose, Marion is gone either through trade or FA walk. Then we target someone like Brand or Boozer as our low post guy. Then you try to move guys like haslem, Blount, Wright or Banks as well as using the exceptions to fill the gaps at the 3 and 5 and strengthen the bench where outside shooting becomes a priority.

If Beasley is the top pick, I think there's a decent chance of extending Marion to a reasonable deal and you end up with a Wade-Marion-Beasley trio. You can then move Haslem for some backcourt help, and again fill in the gaps with the spare parts.
User avatar
DayofMourning
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,012
And1: 93,190
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
       

 

Post#1005 » by DayofMourning » Wed May 21, 2008 10:21 pm

Or....

We draft Beasley, trade Marion to Toronto for Calderon/draft pick/expiring contract (?), stink like heck next year-draft Thabeet, and then go into '10 with max player cap space and sign LeBron. :clap:

C: Thabeet
F: Beasley
F: James
G: Wade
G: Calderon

Not bad eh? :rofl:
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

 

Post#1006 » by Wade2k6 » Thu May 22, 2008 1:27 am

heat4life wrote:Someone on the Bulls board suggested:

Hinrich + Nocioni + Gooden

for

Marion + Blount

Thoughts?
Um, i'd be willing to do that...

PG: Hinrich, Banks
SG: Wade, Wright
SF: Nocioni, Beasley
PF: Beasley, Gooden/Haslem
C: Diop, Gooden, Dorsey

Trade one of Gooden or Haslem to pick up a legit starting C and move Diop to the bench. Use the 2nd round pick on Dorsey
User avatar
DBurks2818
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,099
And1: 2,428
Joined: Mar 16, 2006
Location: At the Cross, Where Amazing Happened.
 

 

Post#1007 » by DBurks2818 » Thu May 22, 2008 2:12 am

Forgot about Cook in that lineup. And Dorsey probably won't be there at 52, but other than that it looks like a good team.
User avatar
LEIF
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,606
And1: 921
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Charleston, SC. Born and raised in The City of North Miami.
Contact:
       

 

Post#1008 » by LEIF » Thu May 22, 2008 2:24 am

I doubt we deal Marion, we would rather let him expire (as soon as this year if he were to opt out, but definatley in summer 09) or extend him to a reasonable long term deal.

if we could get Marion for 5 years $50 million I would extend him.
Image

Follow me on Twitter @Lefty_Leif
User avatar
Flash4thewin
RealGM
Posts: 13,451
And1: 9,747
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

 

Post#1009 » by Flash4thewin » Thu May 22, 2008 2:46 am

My question is how efficient would marion be at sf since hes mainly played pf for the past few seasons. The speed advantage he has against pf would be lost at sf and his rebound numbers would go down but his def should go up.
User avatar
HeatSince88
Veteran
Posts: 2,974
And1: 12
Joined: Feb 06, 2004

 

Post#1010 » by HeatSince88 » Thu May 22, 2008 3:05 am

The inherent problem with Marion/Beasley at SF/PF is neither is equipped to defend the bigger post players you need to get thru in the playoffs. Garnett's length would eat them alive, as would Sheed's, Duncan's, etc.

- With Marion/Beasley at SF/PF, I'd almost rather see a Jeff Foster or a Ronny Turiaf at center than someone like Diop, so they can be the guy who defends the other team's toughest post player regardless of position (like PJ Brown and Brian Grant have done for us in the past). I know the reponse .. what about Haslem? Well sorry, but a 6'8" center with short arms won't cut it in the NBA. We need more size up front.

- Beasley would then defend the weakest of the other team's frontcourt players ... Like if Jeff Foster defends Duncan, Beasley takes Oberto or Horry or whatever. Or if Foster takes Ilgauska, Beasley takes Ben Wallace.

- Marion takes the toughest perimeter assigment, unless it's a quick PG, in which case the PG we trade Haslem for should be a tough defender. But Marion is in effect the perimeter stopper, the Bruce Bowen type. So he takes Lebron or Pierce or Kobe or Ginobli so wade doesn't have to worry his pretty little head ...

So defensively, I think we can be pretty darn good with a versatile defender at C and a solid one at PG too.
DanDanE420
Pro Prospect
Posts: 767
And1: 47
Joined: May 16, 2005

 

Post#1011 » by DanDanE420 » Thu May 22, 2008 3:47 am

The inherent problem with Marion/Beasley at SF/PF is neither is equipped to defend the bigger post players you need to get thru in the playoffs. Garnett's length would eat them alive, as would Sheed's, Duncan's, etc.


Didn't Haslem hold 'Sheed to about 10 ppg and 40% shooting in the '06 Playoffs? Guys like Garnett will get theirs, but the trio of forwards can frustrate them.

The only guys that would give Haslem/Beasley/Marion serious problems defensively are true centers, but those guys would be covered by a defensive-minded five (Zo, Diop, Foster, whoever.)
CaliHeat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,927
And1: 441
Joined: Jun 19, 2007

 

Post#1012 » by CaliHeat » Thu May 22, 2008 4:03 am

What you guys think of this trade, it works moeny wise.

Mia Trades: Haslem
Mia Gets: Jarrett Jack and Joel Przybilla

Por Trades: Jarrett Jack and Joel Przybilla
Por Gets: Hedo Turkolu

Orl Trades: Hedo Turkolu
Orl Gets: Udonis Haslem

Im very reluctant to trade Haslem to the Magic but the Magic probably covet Haslem the most due to the Van Gundy relationship and the fact that Haslem is the perfect PF to put next to D.Howard.

My other worry about this trade is with Joel Pryzbilla's contract and if that extra year will hurt our cap space. IF NOT, I think this guy is the perfect C to play along side Beasley. He can defend the dominant post scorer and provide the Heat with the same type of energy that Haslem brought to the game. Only thing he doesn't have is a great offensive game but when you got Beasley, you really dont need one.

Pryzbilla is 28 now but will be 29 before the season. He has 3 years left on his contract. So we would have him when he is 29-32 years old.

Also, we HAVE TO find a trading partner for Mark Blount and I dont see one, Riley will have to work his magic.
GameTime_3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,480
And1: 4,051
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Location: Earth
Contact:

 

Post#1013 » by GameTime_3 » Thu May 22, 2008 4:13 am

How about this for a retooling plan.

Miami Trades- Haslem-Blount-2#(Beasley)
Bucks trade- Mo-Bogut-Charlie V-2009 1st(protected)

Miami Signs Ronny Turouf (MLE)

Bogut
Turiof-Charlie V
Marion-Dorrel
Wade-Cook
Mo-Banks

Move Marion for Legit SF.

That team would be young and great.
User avatar
Lane1974
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,219
And1: 25
Joined: May 24, 2003
Contact:

 

Post#1014 » by Lane1974 » Thu May 22, 2008 4:16 am

what makes you think getting 60% of the Bucks who have sucked so hard for so long makes us special?
Image
User avatar
Lane1974
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,219
And1: 25
Joined: May 24, 2003
Contact:

 

Post#1015 » by Lane1974 » Thu May 22, 2008 4:40 am

Insomnia has its priveledges: had a crazy idea, predicated on the Bulls taking Beasley (which Ira says is what's going to happen according to his source)

We then trade Rose to Dallas for Kidd and we unload Blount, Banks, and our salary cloggers to make it happen. Mavs have their counter to Paul, Williams and whoever. Riley can sell a trio of Kidd, matrix and Wade to the fanbase. The best part is we have 40 million in expiring money from Kidd and Marion alone after 2009. Grab Brand and the best free agent PG in free agency that year. Addendum: if they are really disenchanted with josh Howard, maybe we try and get him, throw Haslem back to them. We'd have a starting core of Kidd, Wade, Howard, Marion, and MLE center until be t year then Wade Howard Brand or Boozer and another max free agent.
Image
GameTime_3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,480
And1: 4,051
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Location: Earth
Contact:

 

Post#1016 » by GameTime_3 » Thu May 22, 2008 4:53 am

Sorry Lane get some sleep lol. No to kidd, He is everything but a kidd now. But Dumping Blount would b a nice dream.

How about Hedo-JJ redick-B.Cook for Haslem-Blount? We relase JJ so he can go shoot somewhere else. Let Marion expire or trade him for a C or PG.
User avatar
Lane1974
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,219
And1: 25
Joined: May 24, 2003
Contact:

 

Post#1017 » by Lane1974 » Thu May 22, 2008 4:58 am

its not about Kidd. Its about his cap space
Image
User avatar
Cruel_Ruin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,091
And1: 767
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
Location: The intersection of intellect, imagination and insanity
   

 

Post#1018 » by Cruel_Ruin » Thu May 22, 2008 5:42 am

Would you do a deal centered around Haslem/Banks/Blount for Artest/B.Miller if the Kings were to (somehow) acquire a draft pick that is 6-9?
User avatar
HeatInOhio
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,973
And1: 17
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: South FL

 

Post#1019 » by HeatInOhio » Thu May 22, 2008 5:56 am

Cruel_Ruin wrote:Would you do a deal centered around Haslem/Banks/Blount for Artest/B.Miller if the Kings were to (somehow) acquire a draft pick that is 6-9?


PG Rose
SG Wade
SF Artest
PF Marion
C Miller

or...

PG ?
SG Wade
SF Artest/Marion
PF Beasley/Marion
C Miller

I think either way... I would do that.

EDIT... oh wait a minute, I just figured out that you want Beasley or Rose in that package... well then... ahh no. If Riley trades the pick unless its for an absolute stud then I'll scream.
Iputsomepantson
Banned User
Posts: 2,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2007
Location: The future

 

Post#1020 » by Iputsomepantson » Thu May 22, 2008 6:32 am

Lane1974 wrote:its not about Kidd. Its about his cap space


All having cap space does is give you overpaid talent at best. At worst it gets you NOTHING.

Just look at the Bulls the offseason that Eddie Jones signed with us.

Why unload two stars just to dump salary?

It just doesn't make sense.

Look at the silly monkey.

Image

Return to Miami Heat