gkonstantas wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I highly aggree with the overrated issue of stats in the US... Statistically wise, Ginobili wasn t in Europe half as good as he is now, Greek players like Diamantides are awkard... The approach to the game is different, no serious defence by NBA teams, and some players play only for the stats in USA. The thing that makes a basketball player great is things you see in his game without having to be dominant in numbers. I have seen Kobe be in an awful game throught statistically but he is the leader of his team and the best player in the court every single night... So does KG for Boston.so does even Papaloukas for CSKA(assists is the only stat he leads his team,but is so fun to watch him by the stands, believe me)
I hope you're not putting Papaloukas in the same category as KG or Kobe. He's getting increasingly overrated. If you want to call him the Euroleague's version of KG, fine. However, he wouldn't do much in the NBA. He's no Gasol or Nowitzki.
Just look at Spanoulis. He was a great Euroleague player, but sucked in the NBA.
I agree that players like Zach Randolph who score 20 ppg+ on bad NBA teams, inflate their stats. I think recently, however, NBA teams have become more critical of such players. I don't think teamwork is starting to take precedence over individual play, especially on good teams. Very few playoff teams rely on one superstar to win. Actually, I can only think of one team in the playoffs that does so (the Cavs with Lebron). The rest (Phoenix, SA, Detroit, Boston, Mavs, LA, Toronto, Orlando, Utah, etc) play as a team, and have good role-players. Actually, I haven't seen so much teamwork on display in an NBA season in a while.
The best teams in the NBA (LA, SA, Boston, Detroit, Utah, etc.) play very good defense, so I disagree with labeling NBA teams as weak on defense. I would expect the top Euroleague team to beat Miami, not because they have better talent, but because they are a better team. I would even put money on the University of Memphis over a Wade-less Miami squad.
If you throw the top European team in the NBA, they wouldn't make the playoffs and would have trouble beating our worst teams. It's like throwing the top MLS team in the Premier League. They might be able to hang around for a couple of games or maybe even a month, but in the end they'd be over-matched. Euroleague teams just don't have the athleticism or talent.
The big difference between the NBA and Europe is, only the best Euroleague players have the talent to play in the NBA. Euroleague scrub players don't have a shot. On the other hand, American scrub players (Morris, Langdan, Holden, and Greer, to name a few) go to Europe and become starters or even their respective team's best player. The Euroleague isn't at the same level as the NBA. Sorry, those preseason games in Europe don't mean crap. It's like when an MLS team beats Chelsea in a preseason game. It's nothing more than a preseason game.
If the NBA wants to become more competitive, they should shorten the season to 40 games and cut the number of teams back to 20 or less. This way, we'd be able to weed out the scrub teams and players and the games would mean a lot more.