As for the Forsett/Duckett talk...
DeHaven really likes Justin Forsett as a returner. He runs hard, doesn't go down on the first hit, is sometimes difficult for opponents to see and is very tough. He said Nate Burleson is definitely out as a returner if he is going to be No. 1 receiver.
http://blogs.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2008/08/20/p30223#more30223I just listened to Mitch Levy's interview of Mike Holmgren this morning, and a couple things jumped out:
1) While discussing Justin Forsett, he said that his decision at the end is either with the Seahawks or elsewhere. He essentially acknowledged that Forsett will not get through waivers if they try to place him on the practice squad. He also said he realizes that there could be a public backlash if the guy is cut.
2) Regarding T.J. Duckett, Hugh Millen was very critical, saying that he is a one-trick pony whose one trick is not that effective. Holmgren did not really defend Duckett, instead acknowledging that "the pile is pretty big" in front of him, meaning the other running backs. He said the Duckett decision also will come down to the end.
http://blogs.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2008/08/20/forsett_vs_duckett_conundrum#commentsAlright, so the team realizes Forsett's not making the practice squad, the coaching staff believes he can contribute on special team (and they haven't really been trying anyone else as a return man), and Holmgren isn't exactly gushing about Duckett.
I wonder if this decision's already made?