Dat2U wrote:I gotta side with barely & CCJ on this one. I don't like the trade all that much.
My theory on NBA trades is pretty simple and is a tried and true measure. Whoever gets the best player in the deal gets the better of the trade.
Can any of you honestly say that Mike Miller or Randy Foye are and will be better than anyone we could have drafted at #5?
For all you James Harden fans, alot of you are the same folks touting this trade, are you suggesting that he would have never equalled what Mike Miller or Randy Foye is today?
Both Miller & Foye are considered offensive minded players. Neither is known for their defense. However Miller's PER last year was 13.84 and Foye's PER was 13.76. So what does that tell us if the league average 15.00 and PER is considered the best way of measuring a players productiveness?
I believe we needed quality talent NOT quantity. To me its about a team filling out its rotation, instead of attempting to add an impact player.
Unless you can convince me that Miller & Foye are the final pieces to a championship puzzle, I have trouble viewing this as a good deal for the Wizards.
Pecherov's PER was 14.5. Per-36 averages of 15.1 points and 9.9 rebounds. An 82.8% FT shooter.
What EG did was draft Javale in the year he could have drafted Chalmers. Pecherov and Blatche both would have played more minutes and put up better stats. Don't get me wrong, I love Javale's ups and potential, but when he came in Pecherov or Blatche should have been traded. (I said draft Millsap, not Pecherov).
I believe Pecherov just helps open up the middle for Jefferson and Love. Imagine Curry at the point shooting threes, Pecherov shooting threes, and AL Jefferson beasting inside. Love will be the ultmate garbage man for the Wolves.
Dat, this might help the Wizards this season but I'm pretty sure Minny got the better of this deal.