xKLNx Phenom wrote:Can someone sig that?
Steve Smith is only a little better than Chansi Stuckey. Both are smaller WR's, that should be most fitted in the slot. I see Smith being a solid #2-3 option at WR. He just isn't dominate enough to be a #1. He's not a big TD guy, nor is he physical enough to be a #1.
Smith had 57 Catches and 1 TD in his 2nd season
Stuckey had 32 Catches and 3 TD's in technically his rookie season.
Smith was a 2nd round pick, Stuckey was a 7th.
Hixon is too small to do anything in the NFL either. Hakeem Nicks won't do much in his rookie season. As it's hard to translate into the NFL as a WR. Barden is as pro ready as me. And Sinorce Moss has been a bust, and Manningham looks iffy.
Cotchery has put up 85 catches, 1,200 yards before. Clowney has breakout potential. And, I discussed Stuckey before.
The difference between the Jets and the Giants WR corp is, that Tanny is looking to add another piece, ala Matt Jones/Plax/Harisson, unlike the Giants FO.
And yet again you look like a fool. Please ignore me again, it's getting tiring making you look stupid. Steve Smith before this year was only playing in 3 wide sets, which we didnt have many of, since we run the ball so effectively, and often. But when he was in, he gets open. Period. Its pointless comparing stats because the Jets passed in wide open sets much more often because they were behind much more often

, and they had a 50 year old "gun slinger" playing QB for them. I have nothing more to say to you. Just wait until the season starts and Steve Smith once again makes you look foolish.
btw, you want to add Matt Jones (coke fiend), Harrison (washed up) and Plax (minimum 2 years in jail)....well be my guest
And Hixon is 6-1. Tell me exactly how that is too small.
Nicks was in a pro style offense, so his game is ready to translate to the NFL.
Barden isnt pro ready as I said, but he's more pro ready then you since you have a broken collarbone and cant move.
And Moss and Manningham have had their best camps to date. So...yea once again you're wrong.