GM a Team - Deep Thoughts/Suggestions

SamBone · Post #81 » by **SamBone** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:02 pm

lukekarts wrote:
britblazerdude wrote:Klomp is a condescending poster.

High risk strategy trying to get on the wrong side of a moderator

lol

Post #82 » by **CellarDoor** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:07 pm

lukekarts wrote:
britblazerdude wrote:Klomp is a condescending poster.

High risk strategy trying to get on the wrong side of a moderator

Especially when there wasn't anything wrong with that particular post. This thread is for the GM-a-Team game, we have a general discussion/think tank stickied, and he's since posted it there.

Post #83 » by **Klomp** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:09 pm

britblazerdude wrote:Klomp is a condescending poster.

Was anything incorrect? Was I namecalling?

Speaking of condescending....

britblazerdude wrote:So please don't judge what I do and just stick to your own game you arrogant prick.

Any more questions?

Post #84 » by **CellarDoor** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:14 pm

Klomp with the return. 0-15.

britblazerdude · Post #85 » by **britblazerdude** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:25 pm

Klomp wrote:
britblazerdude wrote:Klomp is a condescending poster.

Was anything incorrect? Was I namecalling?

Speaking of condescending....
britblazerdude wrote:So please don't judge what I do and just stick to your own game you arrogant prick.

Any more questions?

I made that comment because you were being condescending too. You had no idea what you were talking about and called out a move I was making. Even though you were wrong. You then called me out on another thread, even though I had already fixed my mistake.

Arrogant, "Overbearingly assuming." Condescending, "showing or implying a usually patronizing descent from dignity or superiority."

It's pretty clear to me that the "mod" title has gone to your head and you feel like you can go around condescending posters when they make mistakes, like posting into the wrong thread. You roam around attacking small mistakes from "regular posters." I don't think that's really the point of being a moderator.

Post #86 » by **CellarDoor** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:30 pm

britblazerdude wrote:
Klomp wrote:
britblazerdude wrote:Klomp is a condescending poster.

Was anything incorrect? Was I namecalling?

Speaking of condescending....
britblazerdude wrote:So please don't judge what I do and just stick to your own game you arrogant prick.

Any more questions?

I made that comment because you were being condescending too. You had no idea what you were talking about and called out a move I was making. Even though you were wrong. You then called me out on another thread, even though I had already fixed my mistake.

Arrogant, "Overbearingly assuming." Condescending, "showing or implying a usually patronizing descent from dignity or superiority."

It's pretty clear to me that the "mod" title has gone to your head and you feel like you can go around condescending posters when they make mistakes, like posting into the wrong thread. You roam around attacking small mistakes from "regular posters." I don't think that's really the point of being a moderator.

Take it to PMs. We're done discussing this out here.

Post #87 » by **Klomp** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:21 pm

What are peoples thoughts about trades for nothing? Personally, at the very least I think a heavily protected future 2nd should be involved

jcldallas24 · Post #88 » by **jcldallas24** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:39 pm

Na i don't mind a player being traded for nothing as long as he doesn't have huge value if its just a min player i don't think it should matter

A suggestion that im throwing out there is making having an AIM account mandatory.....makes it so much easier to deal....

babyjax13 · Post #89 » by **babyjax13** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:55 pm

Klomp wrote:What are peoples thoughts about trades for nothing? Personally, at the very least I think a heavily protected future 2nd should be involved

I don't have a problem with it. teams look to create TE's, dump players, etc. I am actually surprised we don't see it more in the NBA.

Mascot · Post #90 » by **Mascot** » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:48 am

jcldallas24 wrote:Na i don't mind a player being traded for nothing as long as he doesn't have huge value if its just a min player i don't think it should matter

A suggestion that im throwing out there is making having an AIM account mandatory.....makes it so much easier to deal....

i have an aim account, i just do not use it. Why is aim so much better than MSN? Because imho it is not.

Post #91 » by **Klomp** » Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:27 am

Mascot wrote:i have an aim account, i just do not use it.

This is why mandating an aim account isn't worth it. Some people don't have the time, or don't take the time to use it. Everyone uses email.

babyjax13 · Post #92 » by **babyjax13** » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:42 am

I won't participate if IM is required.

Post #93 » by **Klomp** » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:37 am

Also, some people's main computer access might be at work, where AIM could either be blocked, or they are not allowed to download programs on their company computers.

britblazerdude · Post #94 » by **britblazerdude** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:55 pm

We could chat-roulette until we find each other

SamBone · Post #95 » by **SamBone** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:22 pm

AIM or other IM service is nice way to chat, but not manditory by any means. email works just fine

jcldallas24 · Post #96 » by **jcldallas24** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:26 pm

hmm okay nvm bad idea lol

BlackIce · Post #97 » by **BlackIce** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:05 pm

SamBone wrote:AIM or other IM service is nice way to chat, but not manditory by any means. email works just fine

Couldn't have said it any better myself. Some people may want to play, and not have access or want AIM. Sambone used to be like that, but he always checked his emails so it was fine. My LA team is still better though.

SamBone · Post #98 » by **SamBone** » Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:38 pm

BlackIce wrote:
SamBone wrote:AIM or other IM service is nice way to chat, but not manditory by any means. email works just fine

Couldn't have said it any better myself. Some people may want to play, and not have access or want AIM. Sambone used to be like that, but he always checked his emails so it was fine. My LA team is still better though.

Clipps always have been and still are a minor league team compaired to the Lakers and that is not changing! :lol:

? I am almost always on AIM , ask rocdogg he gets daily messages from my 5 year old

BlackIce · Post #99 » by **BlackIce** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:38 am

No I meant in past games, you didn't have it.

Mascot · Post #100 » by **Mascot** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:27 pm

ok, so since the game is over now, we should schedule a new one to start at the end of July? A month off and by that time most of the free agents will have been signed. Or do we want to start another one around July 8th-12th after the big names have signed?