Dalembert to Sacramento

So Cal Blazer Fan
Sophomore
Posts: 135
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 27, 2004
Location: Lost in Cyberspace
Contact:

Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#1 » by So Cal Blazer Fan » Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:58 pm

Guess he must have waived part of his trade kicker to make the deal work....
User avatar
mercury
Head Coach
Posts: 6,407
And1: 679
Joined: Jul 22, 2003

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#2 » by mercury » Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:01 am

Can he be traded again with a pick (not current teammate)?
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#3 » by loserX » Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:37 pm

So Cal Blazer Fan wrote:Guess he must have waived part of his trade kicker to make the deal work....


Depends when the deal is officially official. If it's in the 2009-2010 contract year, then yes, he would have had to waive almost all of it. If it's in the 2010-2011 contract year (when the Kings have big capspace), he wouldn't have to waive any of it.

mercury wrote:Can he be traded again with a pick (not current teammate)?


I don't see why not...but why would he be?
Three34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 36,406
And1: 123
Joined: Sep 18, 2002

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#4 » by Three34 » Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:12 pm

The deal is official, and so, unless I typoed or confused myself or something, I got this:

http://blog.shamsports.com/2010/06/amou ... html#kings
Dunkenstein
Starter
Posts: 2,454
And1: 13
Joined: Jun 17, 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#5 » by Dunkenstein » Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:09 pm

Sham wrote:The deal is official, and so, unless I typoed or confused myself or something, I got this:

http://blog.shamsports.com/2010/06/amou ... html#kings

Your numbers look right on. I guess you're figuring no QO for Dominic McGuire which is probably reasonable.
answerthink
Junior
Posts: 325
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Contact:

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#6 » by answerthink » Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:17 pm

Only thing you may want to consider clarifying is his maximum trade kicker. I believe you are reporting that Dalembert's salary includes likely bonuses. Since trade kickers are based only on base compensation, his true maximum trade kicker would be less than $1,936,923. The adjusted salary numbers, however, are very correct in my opinion (as this will almost certainly have no impact).
Three34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 36,406
And1: 123
Joined: Sep 18, 2002

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#7 » by Three34 » Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:20 pm

And I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for this meddling kid. Bugger. (Thanks.)
lakerfan10770
Starter
Posts: 2,212
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 03, 2005
 

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#8 » by lakerfan10770 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:06 pm

Quick question, not that it matters, but is the TPE that the 76ers get in this deal based on Dalembert's salary with or without the TK?

With the TK the TPE = $2,558,200
Without the TK the TPE = $2,192,894

Edit:
Here's another question that has nothing to do with this trade, but in lieu of starting another thread I thought I would throw it in here, anyways......

Charlie Bell had a 15% trade kicker, and if I am understanding things correctly then his 2010-2011 salary of $3,851,440 and his ETO for 2011-2012 of $4,099,920 are included in the calculation giving a total Trade Kicker of $1,192,704. The trade kicker would be spread evenly amongst his 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 salaries, but not his ETO year. So that would now make his 2009-2010 salary $4,172,312 and his 2010-2011 salary $4,420,792.
Three34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 36,406
And1: 123
Joined: Sep 18, 2002

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#9 » by Three34 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:29 pm

Was that Bell thing really a question?
lakerfan10770
Starter
Posts: 2,212
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 03, 2005
 

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#10 » by lakerfan10770 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:54 pm

Sham wrote:Was that Bell thing really a question?


Not really, I guess I could have phrased that a little better......but do the numbers look right to you?
Dunkenstein
Starter
Posts: 2,454
And1: 13
Joined: Jun 17, 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#11 » by Dunkenstein » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:29 am

Actual numbers:

09-10 $4,199,312
10-11 $4,447,792
answerthink
Junior
Posts: 325
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Contact:

Re: Dalembert to Sacramento 

Post#12 » by answerthink » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:20 am

As to your first question, the calculation is without the TK

Return to CBA & Business