#13 for Fernandez+#22 (Deal dead, pg. 26)

TCHOKE · Post #101 » by **TCHOKE** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:33 am

batum would be nice,
or if we can include hedo in this trade ?
get pryz back

Kabookalu · Post #102 » by **Kabookalu** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:34 am

I'll do it if they take Hedo.

phailing101 · Post #103 » by **phailing101** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:34 am

I just saw this deal and I almost puked on myself.

Yes, its a 4 player draft but the fall from 13 to 22 is MASSIVE.

Hold the line BC!! Take the BBA (Best Big Available) and deal with the trades outside of the draft.

Post #104 » by **DG88** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:34 am

There needs to be more added to this deal to make it enticing.

kingz32 · Post #105 » by **kingz32** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:35 am

KingstonRaptors wrote:
Well, I'm under the impression that a good GM doesn't cripple the franchise by helping a turd find a new home after dogging the season for the team that paid him big bucks..

I pray that your right.

ATLTimekeeper · Post #106 » by **ATLTimekeeper** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:35 am

F it. He's a back-up, and a bitchy one at that. Doesn't fill any needs. We rid Portland of a headache and lose spots on the ladder? No way.

phailing101 · Post #107 » by **phailing101** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:35 am

Seriously, this deal needs to be sweetened substantially.

You don't get to climb 9 spots in the draft by fluffing off some role player SG.

KingstonRaptors · Post #108 » by **KingstonRaptors** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:36 am

TCHOKE wrote:batum would be nice,
or if we can include hedo in this trade ?
get pryz back

Dream trade (Hedo for Joel).

Macho · Post #109 » by **Macho** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:36 am

This trade would nicely set us up for a disappointing summer.

Paperclip · Post #110 » by **Paperclip** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:37 am

"The Blazers have been very aggressive about getting up into the lottery, but have been reluctant to part with both Fernandez and the 22nd pick to do it."

Please reject us Blazers.

Post #111 » by **Maritimer** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:37 am

What about 13/Evans for 22/Rudy/Przybilla? THAT would be a nice variation.

C_Money · Post #112 » by **C_Money** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:37 am

Great we get a guy who's going to whine if things don't go his way. I'de rather have Aldrich or Patterson.

KingstonRaptors · Post #113 » by **KingstonRaptors** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:38 am

Maritimer wrote:What about 13/Evans for 22/Rudy/Przybilla? THAT would be a nice variation.

Yes, yes it would. Always liked the grittiness of Przybilla. He'll step in nicely at the 5.

Edit: I knew Joel was injured last season but to what severity I did not. 2 knee injuries. Ouch. Poor guy.

Rapsobsessed7 · Post #114 » by **Rapsobsessed7** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:39 am

Maritimer wrote:What about 13/Evans for 22/Rudy/Przybilla? THAT would be a nice variation.

it would, doesnt work though,

Reggie Evans $5,080,000
X 1.25 + 100,000
= 6,450,000

Joel Przybilla $7,405,300
Rudy Fernandez $1,246,680

so it doesnt work. Maybe add Belinelli and #34?

Evans + Belinelli + #13 for Pryz + Rudy + #22 + #36.

you then flip #36 + Cash to MEM for #28

Paperclip · Post #115 » by **Paperclip** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:40 am

Maritimer wrote:What about 13/Evans for 22/Rudy/Przybilla? THAT would be a nice variation.

Edit - Didn`t realize Pryz broke his knee twice last year. Nevermind.

elmer_yuck · Post #116 » by **elmer_yuck** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:42 am

We need defense and rebounding.
So we're trading for Rudy Fernandez?

Post #117 » by **DG88** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:42 am

Chisholm and Holly aren't fans of this trade either

timpchisholm

+1 @stackmack: Not fan of this for the Raps. At all. RT @blazersedge: Ford: PDX talking with Raps, Rudy+picks involved http://bit.ly/a42zvi

Indeed · Post #118 » by **Indeed** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:42 am

kingz32 wrote:Why is everyone assuming that Bradley will be there at 22? Recent reports claim that the Pacers are really high on him and have no shams with taking him at #10. He might not even be around at 13 to begin with.

Yes, and trading for #22 means all the prospects that we want are gone.
This might be a backup plan for BC, in case Aldrich, Bradley, George, Patterson, Udoh and etc are all gone, then Rudy + #22 would make sense to me.

Blasphemy · Post #119 » by **Blasphemy** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:43 am

anychance we get Greg Oden instead of rudy?

Mr.Raptorsingh · Post #120 » by **Mr.Raptorsingh** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:43 am

Maritimer wrote:What about 13/Evans for 22/Rudy/Przybilla? THAT would be a nice variation.

Yeah, I'd perfectly fine with this.

BTW what if the Blazers want Bradley at 13? How ironic would that be.