coldfish wrote:Well, then. Strike out it is. Two immediate comments:
- This is Chicago's third massive failure in free agency in 10 years. Don't. Ever. Do. It. Again. If anything, it may be the worst strike out because the Bulls gave up so much to get here.
- Chicago now has to choose between locking in mediocrity or coming up with a different plan for moving forward. I'm not sure that the knee jerk idea of signing Boozer or Lee is the right idea.
Thank you for saying the second part. People need to take a step back and think right now, which nobody wants to do because they are swept in in emotion/panic. If anything, to me, this makes me NOT want Carlos Boozer. I only wanted Boozer if the Bulls got one of Lebron/Wade and the team was ready to compete for a title. Now, I say no to Boozer. I don't want a 29 year old who has a great chance of being injured for 40 games next year and is on the verge of decline. If they are determined to spend the money, get me David Lee. Lee is a guy who is young, not injury prone, and is the same age-range as the rest of the Bulls. Lee has room to improve, Boozer does not.
Bottom line is that locking up Boozer for 4-5 years just screams locking into 2nd round knock-outs. I only want Boozer if Lebron is here, which looks very unlikely.
















