ImageImageImageImageImage

Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#241 » by paul » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:29 am

KnicksGod wrote:
paul wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:This MILW poster did say that Jennings tore up Felton, I believe. He didn't really qualify it. If anything the games last season showed that they played to a draw but one could even see Felton as having had the upperhand. Jennings really didn't come close to tearing him up on the whole.

But it's whatever. He doesn't think he said that and I don't care enough to go back to the thread. I *believe* those were pretty much his exact words.


So you didn't read my explanation either? Glad I bothered.



I read it but I read your original comment differently. You seemed to be saying Jennings burned him over and over. If you're not, then we can agree. Felton tore his ass up one game, Jennings hammered him another, and the other two were closer calls.

It's really not that big a deal. Is there something in the air today that is making everybody take things so seriously?


You asked the question, I answered it. We don't need to talk about your very thinly veiled implied accusation with the question in the first place :wink:

As to the serious stuff, you'd need to trace it back in this thread, but my experience is telling me that outsiders are frowned upon, seriously.
bklynstoops
Head Coach
Posts: 6,699
And1: 1,675
Joined: Jul 04, 2008

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#242 » by bklynstoops » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:30 am

Capital Edge (Bucks fan) wrote: it made you guys look more stupid then you or ready are.


Sweet. here's another sig for your Buck buddy. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#243 » by K_ick_God » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:32 am

Capital Edge wrote:
Striders wrote:
paul wrote:Yeah, again I'd have a look at which fans were leading the charge on that front....

Or you could just read my sig, then laugh.


Er...Capital Edge has made several derogatory comments about Knicks fans. And you yourself insinuated that all Knick fans are homers in the other thread.

Yeah, I know Mil was getting bashed, but don't pretend as if you guys were just defending yourselves.

:lol:.....You guys said Felton is better than Jennings and I thought it made you guys look more stupid then you or ready are.



You miiiiiiiight just might be putting Brandon Jennings in the HOF a little too prematurely. Let's see if he can get his shooting % up to 40% before it's so absurd for someone to give their opinion that Felton might be the better player looking ahead a couple of years.

Jennings showed flashes of brilliance in his rookie year -- and yes, the Knicks would have drafted him if they could do it all over -- but you're counting your chickens a little fast. He is a PG with a scorer's mentality who shoots 38% and has character questions. Felton has not lived up to lottery pick yet but he is coming off a very good season and is just hitting prime. Next season he'll have the leash taken off his game.

We'll see what happens.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#244 » by paul » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:35 am

KnicksGod wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:
Striders wrote:

Er...Capital Edge has made several derogatory comments about Knicks fans. And you yourself insinuated that all Knick fans are homers in the other thread.

Yeah, I know Mil was getting bashed, but don't pretend as if you guys were just defending yourselves.

:lol:.....You guys said Felton is better than Jennings and I thought it made you guys look more stupid then you or ready are.



You miiiiiiiight just might be putting Brandon Jennings in the HOF a little too prematurely. Let's see if he can get his shooting % up to 40% before it's so absurd for someone to give their opinion that Felton might be the better player looking ahead a couple of years.

Jennings showed flashes of brilliance in his rookie year -- and yes, the Knicks would have drafted him if they could do it all over -- but you're counting your chickens a little fast. He is a PG with a scorer's mentality who shoots 38% and has character questions. Felton has not lived up to lottery pick yet but he is coming off a very good season and is just hitting prime. Next season he'll have the leash taken off his game.

We'll see what happens.


The HOF? So by saying Jennings is better than Felton he's actually saying Jennings is a HOF'er? Nothing like a little hyperbole in the evening....

bklynstoops wrote:
Capital Edge (Bucks fan) wrote: it made you guys look more stupid then you or ready are.


Sweet. here's another sig for your Buck buddy. :lol: :lol:


I'll leave that one to you, I've always preferred spelling to grammar :lol:
Capital Edge
Banned User
Posts: 655
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#245 » by Capital Edge » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:36 am

OMFG....this is a hilarious thread. God I love Knick fans.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,009
And1: 45,778
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#246 » by GONYK » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:38 am

Capital Edge wrote:OMFG....this is a hilarious thread. God I love Knick fans.

Why did you change what I said in your sig?
Capital Edge
Banned User
Posts: 655
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#247 » by Capital Edge » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:39 am

Er...Capital Edge has made several derogatory comments about Knicks fans. And you yourself insinuated that all Knick fans are homers in the other thread.

Yeah, I know Mil was getting bashed, but don't pretend as if you guys were just defending yourselves.[/quote]
:lol:.....You guys said Felton is better than Jennings and I thought it made you guys look more stupid then you or ready are.[/quote]


You miiiiiiiight just might be putting Brandon Jennings in the HOF a little too prematurely. Let's see if he can get his shooting % up to 40% before it's so absurd for someone to give their opinion that Felton might be the better player looking ahead a couple of years.

Jennings showed flashes of brilliance in his rookie year -- and yes, the Knicks would have drafted him if they could do it all over -- but you're counting your chickens a little fast. He is a PG with a scorer's mentality who shoots 38% and has character questions. Felton has not lived up to lottery pick yet but he is coming off a very good season and is just hitting prime. Next season he'll have the leash taken off his game.

We'll see what happens.[/quote]
B/C I said he was better that's supposed to imply he is HOF?
User avatar
Striders
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,281
And1: 252
Joined: Nov 30, 2009

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#248 » by Striders » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:40 am

Capital Edge wrote:OMFG....this is a hilarious thread. God I love Knick fans.


:roll: Stop trying to act aloof. You were screaming like a child about the big bad Knick fans a few pages ago.
Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom. ~George Smith Patton
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#249 » by paul » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:41 am

GONYK wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:OMFG....this is a hilarious thread. God I love Knick fans.

Why did you change what I said in your sig?


Yeah, that's really not cool.
Capital Edge
Banned User
Posts: 655
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#250 » by Capital Edge » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:42 am

GONYK wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:OMFG....this is a hilarious thread. God I love Knick fans.

Why did you change what I said in your sig?

Ok, I'll take it off if it's hurting your feelings.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,009
And1: 45,778
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#251 » by GONYK » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:42 am

Capital Edge wrote:B/C I said he was better that's supposed to imply he is HOF?

Why did you change what I said in your sig?
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#252 » by K_ick_God » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:43 am

Capital Edge wrote:B/C I said he was better that's supposed to imply he is HOF?




No because you're making like it's funny to predict/think that Felton will be the better player. Right now you can't say that Jennings will absolutely be better than anybody. He had a promising rookie year and that's about it.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,009
And1: 45,778
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#253 » by GONYK » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:45 am

Capital Edge wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:OMFG....this is a hilarious thread. God I love Knick fans.

Why did you change what I said in your sig?

Ok, I'll take it off if it's hurting your feelings.

You don't have to take it off, just make sure you quote me correctly, because what I said is true.

GONYK wrote:If you think Westbrook is a true PG, that proves you have no idea what one is. Westbrook is barely and average passer, and has limited vision.

You probably think Jameer Nelson is a true PG too.


There, I went and got it for you.
Capital Edge
Banned User
Posts: 655
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#254 » by Capital Edge » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:45 am

GONYK wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:B/C I said he was better that's supposed to imply he is HOF?

Why did you change what I said in your sig?

Thought I heard an echo in the room.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,252
And1: 25,712
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#255 » by moocow007 » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:47 am

Capital Edge wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:OMFG....this is a hilarious thread. God I love Knick fans.

Why did you change what I said in your sig?

Ok, I'll take it off if it's hurting your feelings.


Recommendation is to just go away. At least paul there has some valid arguments in spite of his abrasive nature :D . You on the other hand...are not really contributing to the Bucks general defense any.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,252
And1: 25,712
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#256 » by moocow007 » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:47 am

Capital Edge wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:B/C I said he was better that's supposed to imply he is HOF?

Why did you change what I said in your sig?

Thought I heard an echo in the room.


Go away.
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#257 » by K_ick_God » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:47 am

paul wrote:
The HOF? So by saying Jennings is better than Felton he's actually saying Jennings is a HOF'er? Nothing like a little hyperbole in the evening....





Yes it's hyperbole to prove a point: It's certainly not "LOL funny" to think that Felton could be better than Jennings one, two years down the road because Jennings has proven next to nothing as an NBA player. He had one promising rookie season. It's too early.

LOL about it just shows insecurity. Felton is very much in the game to be a top 10 PG in this league and Jennings is very much in the game to still turn out to be a bust.
User avatar
omerome
RealGM
Posts: 16,572
And1: 8,836
Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Location: Maryland (via Brooklyn)

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#258 » by omerome » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:49 am

Capital Edge wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:B/C I said he was better that's supposed to imply he is HOF?

Why did you change what I said in your sig?

Thought I heard an echo in the room.

Maybe it's because you didn't answer his question?

Taking a quote of out context is one thing but to change the quote to something they didn't say at all is completely different. And frankly, anyone who does that automatically loses their credibility.
Capital Edge
Banned User
Posts: 655
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: Do you still think Jennings would be good in NYC 

Post#259 » by Capital Edge » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:55 am

moocow007 wrote:
Capital Edge wrote:
Thought I heard an echo in the room.


Go away.

Just a friendly debate, but whatever you say :giveup:

Return to New York Knicks