The San Francisco Giants are World Series Champions

Martin · Post #61 » by **Martin** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:45 am

It felt too much San Fransisco on the field after the game.

Congrats on winning the WS,hope the Phillies have a rematch with the Giants next year.

Post #62 » by **dockingsched** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:54 am

chris rose is terrible so far, there has to be someone better.

RIPskaterdude · Post #63 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 3:03 am

I WAS WRONG ON MY GIANTS IN 6 PREDICTION, BUT I'LL **** TAKE IT!!! WORLD CHAMPS BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thetennisyao · Post #64 » by **thetennisyao** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 3:37 am

We are the champion of the world!!

Dr Positivity · Post #65 » by **Dr Positivity** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 5:09 am

Very happy for the Giants and their fans. But again this reiterates my problems with baseball. On paper the Giants and Texas are either evenly matched or Texas is an inch better. On paper Philly is clearly better than the Giants. The Giants managed to beat the Phillies outright and crush Texas not because they have that much a better team, but because their team played better. Which is fine, but in every other sport with 7 games series if a team is clearly better they play better. Which is probably why the olden day format of the best AL and NL regular season teams just winning the pennant was probably the most fair for determining the best team, albeit of course business wise it can't be that way

Post #66 » by **sunshinekids99** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 10:13 am

Congrats to all Giants fans, it's been awhile for you so really enjoy it.

Mufasa, I'm with you for the most part. It just takes a team to get hot. I think most Giants fans know if they stacked up rosters 1-25 theres would not be the top. They got hot at the perfect time and pulled it off. I do wonder where this team rates with the rest of world series champions.

Bay_Areas_Finest · Post #67 » by **Bay_Areas_Finest** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 1:55 pm

Pitching wins championships.

The Giants have the best pitching in baseball.

Suck it, haters.

trwi7 · Post #68 » by **trwi7** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 2:13 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FF22cBZJsU[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhTRhAX_QBA[/youtube]

Post #69 » by **Stanford** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 4:16 pm

lol at the haters. This is great.

We win on the backs of four home grown pitchers, and it's "getting hot at the right time". A little credit to Sabean would be nice. Pitching does in fact win championships.

SactownHrtBrks8 · Post #70 » by **SactownHrtBrks8** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 6:09 pm

Dr Mufasa wrote:Very happy for the Giants and their fans. But again this reiterates my problems with baseball. On paper the Giants and Texas are either evenly matched or Texas is an inch better. On paper Philly is clearly better than the Giants. The Giants managed to beat the Phillies outright and crush Texas not because they have that much a better team, but because their team played better. Which is fine, but in every other sport with 7 games series if a team is clearly better they play better. Which is probably why the olden day format of the best AL and NL regular season teams just winning the pennant was probably the most fair for determining the best team, albeit of course business wise it can't be that way

Its called Intangibles and drive, and dominant pitching. What you look like on paper doesn't win you game

GIANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Post #71 » by **sunshinekids99** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 6:15 pm

Stanford wrote:lol at the haters. This is great.

We win on the backs of four home grown pitchers, and it's "getting hot at the right time". A little credit to Sabean would be nice. Pitching does in fact win championships.

It's not anybody hating on the Giants. They got it done and won the championship. There is no denying they did a great job bringing in the right pitchers, they were the best team in baseball when it comes to pitching. Hitting wise lets be honest this is not what you think of when you think Championship caliber. Great job by the Giants, but I'll never think this is the best team in MLB in terms of what their peak could be.

Post #72 » by **craig01** » Tue Nov 2, 2010 11:14 pm

I was pulling for the AL, but the Giants were clearly better in this series.

That's life.

trwi7 · Post #73 » by **trwi7** » Wed Nov 3, 2010 12:04 am

SactownHrtBrks8 wrote:Its called Intangibles and drive

SactownHrtBrks8 · Post #74 » by **SactownHrtBrks8** » Wed Nov 3, 2010 1:30 pm

trwi7 wrote:
SactownHrtBrks8 wrote:Its called Intangibles and drive

You disagree with me on this one?

Post #75 » by **Stanford** » Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:24 pm

That you Joe?

Post #76 » by **cmavswin** » Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:28 pm

Congrats to the Giants it is the same old formula that won them the trophey pitching and defense.

trwi7 · Post #77 » by **trwi7** » Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:51 pm

SactownHrtBrks8 wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
SactownHrtBrks8 wrote:Its called Intangibles and drive

You disagree with me on this one?

Umm, yes.

Dr Positivity · Post #78 » by **Dr Positivity** » Wed Nov 3, 2010 8:56 pm

http://baseball.realgm.com/src_teamarti ... _strategy/

Oops

Wavy Q · Post #79 » by **Wavy Q** » Wed Nov 3, 2010 10:27 pm

Dr Mufasa wrote:http://baseball.realgm.com/src_teamarticle/664/20101011/giants_strengths_reveal_possible_error_in_strategy/

Oops

lol

SactownHrtBrks8 · Post #80 » by **SactownHrtBrks8** » Fri Nov 5, 2010 5:25 pm

trwi7 wrote:Umm, yes.

Well then we'll have to disagree then, when i watch the playoffs i saw team that never put their heads down when they got down, unlike Texas who seemed to fold when they went down in the game. They were a confident team and always got clutch hits. Those are intangibles too me

Who will win the series, how many games will it take, and who will be the MVP?