Andrewchos wrote:There were about 10-12 people in this Thread that had the exact same opinion that I shared and posted it, so why exactly do you single me out? is it because your immature and just dont like me? Yea im pretty sure thats why.
Reading comprehension.
But whatever rocks your boat dude.
Also, I'll admit this isn't the first time I called you out. See viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1071349&start=75
yongaz wrote:nonemus wrote:I don't see why 90% of Lakers fans posts in Kobe threads are now about Andrewchos. Even if his opinions are at times stupid, at least he backs them up with reasoning. Just because he disagrees with you vehemently, no reason to personally attack him. Heck, a lot of the time I disagree with him, but calling his anti-Kobe bias and using that as a leverage to win an argument is stupid, especially considering the pro-Kobe bias of Lakers fans.
And within the echelon of Basketball terminology "Peak" is a season, not just a couple of games.
All that being said, I can see no argument for Drexler being better. He had 2.5 seasons which are statistically comparable to Kobe's, and even within those parameters, he falls short.
I don't have a problem with haters... they'll always be there. I don't have a problem with stupid opinions either, because people are entitled to their stupid opinions. I'm a Laker fan first, Kobe fan second, which means I'll of course open up any Laker / Kobe related threads.
The problem with Andrewscho is not so much of his anti-Kobe bias; it's the fact that he continually says that he 'doesn't dislike Kobe' and unlike the rest of us Kobe homers, views the game subjectively and objectively with 'no bias whatsover'. At least with guys like J23F, whom I find quite the arrogant sob at times, can be man enough and admit his dislike for Kobe. As a matter of fact, I actually respect him (in spite of me trying to rile him up and poking fun at him) and enjoy reading most of his posts.
However andrewchos continues to make claims of unbiasedness and all that and lump all Laker fans, or essentially anyone who argues for Kobe as a homer; of course I'm going to call him out. Sure I admit that none of my posts to him has any substance, but all he does is make a Kobe thread unreadable, especially since he brings out the worst in the homers as well. I've participated in plenty of meaningful discussion here even with Kobe haters, but when someone is clearly arguing on the lulz level, then I'll match that.
There are some clear homers here as well, and they're also lulz worthy, but in any case, I stand by what I've said - andrewchos is a great source of amusement. It's like watching a train wreck, or maybe that monkey that pees into his own mouth ... you're like wtf LOL that's gross but you can't look away... which is why I spent minutes typing this post up and contributing absolutely nothing to the discussion.
Ah such is life.
EDIT: to include one of my posts from another thread on why I called him out.
