ImageImage

ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

BucksRuleAll22
Banned User
Posts: 1,342
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#81 » by BucksRuleAll22 » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:29 am

I wouldn't even be suprised if the Seahawks beat the Bears.

Would of been cool to see Vick play the Falcons but not at the Packers expense.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,538
And1: 42,695
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#82 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:32 am

El Duderino wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:
DrugBust wrote:Saturday at 7:00 CST is the real NFC Championship game.


Let's not get ahead of ourselves either way. We barely beat the Bears, at home, when they had nothing to play for - and Seattle, as mediocre as they are, had an impressive win at home versus the Saints and are generally solid at home.


I agree

The Bears defense gives our offense a lot pf problems and if we did face Chicago in the NFC Title game, there very well could be bad bad weather which in inhibits our passing game.

Keep in mind also that in the Bears game two weeks ago, they only had Hester back returning punts. If we met them in the NFC Title game, he'll be returning kickoffs along with punts. Say then that we had to punt 4 times and had to kickoff 4-5 times, some combination of punts/kickoffs could mean having to kick to Hester around 8-10 times. Scary stuff.


I have been as apprehensive about this team and the season as any, but I'm not gonna back off my opinion that the two best teams are playing on Saturday night. I don't even think it's close.

Something fluky could happen in the NFC game and the Bears or Seahawks could make it to the Superbowl, but there's no possible way I'll feel they were the best team.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#83 » by xTitan » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:56 am

The Bears defense did nothing to stop the Packers 2 Sundays ago, dropped passes, and 4 critical penalties by Bulaga were killer in that game, regardless of what happens the 2 best teams are meeting in ATL next Saturday, wish it was for the NFC title.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#84 » by El Duderino » Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:39 am

DrugBust wrote:
El Duderino wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:
Let's not get ahead of ourselves either way. We barely beat the Bears, at home, when they had nothing to play for - and Seattle, as mediocre as they are, had an impressive win at home versus the Saints and are generally solid at home.


I agree

The Bears defense gives our offense a lot pf problems and if we did face Chicago in the NFC Title game, there very well could be bad bad weather which in inhibits our passing game.

Keep in mind also that in the Bears game two weeks ago, they only had Hester back returning punts. If we met them in the NFC Title game, he'll be returning kickoffs along with punts. Say then that we had to punt 4 times and had to kickoff 4-5 times, some combination of punts/kickoffs could mean having to kick to Hester around 8-10 times. Scary stuff.


I have been as apprehensive about this team and the season as any, but I'm not gonna back off my opinion that the two best teams are playing on Saturday night. I don't even think it's close.

Something fluky could happen in the NFC game and the Bears or Seahawks could make it to the Superbowl, but there's no possible way I'll feel they were the best team.


I agree that Atlanta and Green Bay are the best two teams left, but IMO Chicago just has three things going for them that with make it very tough if we had to face them in the NFC title game

1. A good defense

2. Fabulous special teams. If you either punt or kickoff to Hester, he has a history of turning them into touchdowns or very long returns. Play it safe and kick away from him, it can often lead to good field position for the Bears.

3. Home field

If we faced Chicago, i think odds are the Packers win, but maybe only 60-40 type of odds.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#85 » by Newz » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:05 pm

We have to keep up the same intensity in this game. Don't let Ryan just focus on Roddy White and toss him 10+ receptions. Have to do our best to stop Turner.

On offense and I never feel there are 'keys to the game'. If the offense just does what it does, it should put up points. There is never an excuse on that side of the ball with the talent we have.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#86 » by Flames24Rulz » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:15 pm

xTitan wrote:The Bears defense did nothing to stop the Packers 2 Sundays ago, dropped passes, and 4 critical penalties by Bulaga were killer in that game, regardless of what happens the 2 best teams are meeting in ATL next Saturday, wish it was for the NFC title.


Come on. The Bears defense played pretty well in that game. We had some drive-killing penalties, but give credit where it's due.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#87 » by Flames24Rulz » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:16 pm

Newz wrote:We have to keep up the same intensity in this game. Don't let Ryan just focus on Roddy White and toss him 10+ receptions. Have to do our best to stop Turner.

On offense and I never feel there are 'keys to the game'. If the offense just does what it does, it should put up points. There is never an excuse on that side of the ball with the talent we have.


Like Philly, our offense matches up very favorably with their defense.
Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#88 » by Wilford Brimley » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:20 pm

Justin Blackmon would have caught that pass that Jones dropped. :)
User avatar
WeeksNMeeks
Freshman
Posts: 83
And1: 7
Joined: Aug 05, 2009

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#89 » by WeeksNMeeks » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:41 pm

I think this game comes down to the pass rush. If we continue to collapse the middle of the pocket and tip 2-3 passes a game and get 1-2 sacks from interior lineman, I think we'll be in good shape.

Tony Gonzalez was their hero last game. Even though he dropped that 4th down pass which was ruled a catch, he posed the most significant match-up problem. If you have a strong pass rush, a TE will have to line up in the box more often, making it harder to catch passes.

Lastly, I bet Starks' production falls off against the Falcons, and James Jones redeems himself in a big way. All eyes are on Starks now, and the Falcons' LBs are very fast. I'm pretty sure Jones is in a contract year, and rarely does JJ have 2 poor games in a row.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#90 » by eagle13 » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:43 pm

I agree Falcons>Bears but can't take Bears lightly if we get there. Watch Pack blitz Ryan like crazy!
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#91 » by Newz » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:44 pm

Oh yeah, another key to this game... Catch the **** ball.
Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#92 » by Wilford Brimley » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:44 pm

I'm not sure if blitzing Ryan is a great idea.
Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#93 » by Wilford Brimley » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:46 pm

I'm reading ATL forum and they no nothing about football. "Woodson will be on White all day," "Woodson and Williams are the only 2 guys they have in their secondary," "We need to blitz Rodgers."
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#94 » by Newz » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:49 pm

Wilford Brimley wrote:"Woodson and Williams are the only 2 guys they have in their secondary,"


Image
Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#95 » by Wilford Brimley » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:56 pm

Newz wrote:
Wilford Brimley wrote:"Woodson and Williams are the only 2 guys they have in their secondary,"


Image


Image
Wilford Brimley
Banned User
Posts: 13,477
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#96 » by Wilford Brimley » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:59 pm

Falcons fans are looking at our games from WAAAAY earlier in the season, and are like "They only put up 13 points against the Redskins, they're offense is not a juggernaut." Idiots.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,978
And1: 57,088
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#97 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:04 pm

Yes please blitz us Atlanta, Please.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,978
And1: 57,088
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#98 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:06 pm

Spread now 2 or 2.5. I expect it to stay right about there all week. I doubt it hits 3. I can't see a huge amount of money going on Atlanta.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#99 » by Newz » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:11 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Spread now 2 or 2.5. I expect it to stay right about there all week. I doubt it hits 3. I can't see a huge amount of money going on Atlanta.


I don't like betting against the Packers or any of the Milwaukee teams really as it makes me feel kind of dirty...

If I wasn't a Packer fan, I'd put money down on the Falcons to cover that.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,783
And1: 6,992
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#100 » by LUKE23 » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:20 pm

I wouldn't bet on this game regardless. Packers are impossible to beat big, it hasn't really happened whatsoever in the past 4 seasons or so, outside of one or two games.

This will be a close game.

Return to Green Bay Packers