tontoz wrote:This thread is going to make for a funny bump down the road.
Hopefully the same can be said for your time on this board.
Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico
tontoz wrote:This thread is going to make for a funny bump down the road.
This post was made by Dat2U who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.
tontoz wrote:This post was made by Dat2U who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.
Bye


Induveca wrote:Leonsis saved a little money...........that is all at this point.
We're 0-25 on the road, Orlando has been dominant since their trades. Thus far, Orlando fans have reaped real world benefits. We've received nothing but 25 straight losses on the road, regardless of who is on the roster.
Debating the players involved at this point seems silly. Arenas has been horrible in Orlando aside from two games, Lewis has given nothing in terms of veteran leadership or clutch shooting to our squad. You could argue his empty stats look pretty at times in comparison, but they haven't resulted in us becoming a better team.
We're fast approaching the worst away record of all time..........meanwhile many are gloating over dumping our former franchise player as we head to the worst possible realm of immortality. To each their own I guess. Enjoy your half full glasses.
Ruzious wrote:Really? Who's gloating over anything? Who's happy the team stinks? Just because some don't whine about the Arenas trade doesn't mean there's not a ton of frustration.

AceDegenerate wrote:Ruzious wrote:Really? Who's gloating over anything? Who's happy the team stinks? Just because some don't whine about the Arenas trade doesn't mean there's not a ton of frustration.
I would say Tontoz, TGW, and maybe a couple others are clearly gloating. Nobody claimed you were gloating, however you definitely seem to enjoy taking up the fight for others lately.
Ruzious wrote:Really? Who's gloating over anything? Who's happy the team stinks? Just because some don't whine about the Arenas trade doesn't mean there's not a ton of frustration.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Ruzious wrote:AceDegenerate wrote:Ruzious wrote:Really? Who's gloating over anything? Who's happy the team stinks? Just because some don't whine about the Arenas trade doesn't mean there's not a ton of frustration.
I would say Tontoz, TGW, and maybe a couple others are clearly gloating. Nobody claimed you were gloating, however you definitely seem to enjoy taking up the fight for others lately.
You mean like you just did?

AceDegenerate wrote:Ruzious wrote:AceDegenerate wrote:
I would say Tontoz, TGW, and maybe a couple others are clearly gloating. Nobody claimed you were gloating, however you definitely seem to enjoy taking up the fight for others lately.
You mean like you just did?
I guess irony is lost on Bucks fans.
How about that John Brockman huh?
Ruzious wrote:Well looky here. Our AceD is a Bucks fan. Who'dathought... or cared?

AceDegenerate wrote:Ruzious wrote:Well looky here. Our AceD is a Bucks fan. Who'dathought... or cared?
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/v ... 8T0382eawl
NbdyBeatsTheWiz wrote:montestewart wrote:
Rashard on Wizards: 1) Shorter contract; 2) less overall money; 3) plays more of a position of need; 4) not forced to play out of position; 5) no position competition with young future star; 6) no perception of bad influence on younger players; 7) no bad blood with team; 8) no reputation as head case; 9) solid veteran influence; 10) no significant injury history; 11) likely more easily traded, and at an earlier date
Arenas on Wizards: 1) Longer contract; 2) more overall money; 3) with Wall and Young, Arenas' skills not addressing position of greatest need; 4) forced to play out of position; 5) position competition with Wall; 6) perception of bad influence on younger players; 7) bad blood with team; 8) reputation as head case; 9) significant injury history; 10) may actually be the hardest to trade contract in the league now; and 11) it seems to me like he really wanted out of DC.
...EDIT PS: Dandridge managed to say it in fewer words. Maybe I should have just done a +1
I wouldn't sweat it, we're 60 pages in and your list might be the best synopsis yet.
Induveca wrote:Leonsis saved a little money...........that is all at this point.
We're 0-25 on the road, Orlando has been dominant since their trades. Thus far, Orlando fans have reaped real world benefits. We've received nothing but 25 straight losses on the road, regardless of who is on the roster.
Debating the players involved at this point seems silly. Arenas has been horrible in Orlando aside from two games, Lewis has given nothing in terms of veteran leadership or clutch shooting to our squad. You could argue his empty stats look pretty at times in comparison, but they haven't resulted in us becoming a better team.
We're fast approaching the worst away record of all time..........meanwhile many are gloating over dumping our former franchise player as we head to the worst possible realm of immortality. To each their own I guess. Enjoy your half full glasses.

JonathanJoseph wrote:And a number of your points are extremely debatable or wrong.
Oh yeah?

Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
Rafael122 wrote:I'm gonna have to listen to this interview with Mike Wise w/Gilbert. Based on the tweets, the man sounds like he's lost it.
There is precedent for this type of bizarre split, by the way. Those 1990-91 Kings, they who lost 37 straight road games, and finished 1-40 away from Sacramento? That team (coached by Dick Motta, who led Washington to its only NBA title) was 24-17 at home, and like these Wizards saw a massive degradation in defensive performance when setting out on the road. Were I a Wizards fan, given the infamy those Kings reached in terms of road futility, I'd be rather fearful of the teams' similarities.
JonathanJoseph wrote:
Except, as I've tried to point out repeatedly, there lies the possibility of taking what's behind door number 3, which is any other trade that would have become available.
And a number of your points are extremely debatable or wrong.