Jay81 wrote:What about the OKC model machine that took Harden over Tyreke Evans?
I think it worked out for the best; Evans being ball-dominant will not fit next to Westbrook... Harden doesn't need the ball to be effective...
Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico
Jay81 wrote:What about the OKC model machine that took Harden over Tyreke Evans?

LyricalRico wrote:I'm not saying I doubt that it's possible. I'm just struggling to find where it's explicitly stated that teams can do what OKC apparently did with Collison.
Mark Stein wrote:The Thunder -- as a team slightly more than $6.5 million under the salary cap before re-signing Collison -- took advantage of that below-the-cap status to unexpectedly award Collison all of their space as a signing bonus that takes his 2010-11 compensation to a whopping $13.3 million.
Signing bonuses in extensions are usually pro-rated through the life of the contract. Teams under the cap, though, can apply the entire signing bonus at the time the extension is signed, as long as the bonus doesn't exceed the available cap space.
hands11 wrote:Glad to hear it didn't hit HI like it hit Japan
Funny, CCJ was the first thing that popped in my head when they said he was heading to HI.
eitanr wrote:The Bulls model probably makes a lot more sense specifically to the Wizards franchise as Rose and Noah are two similar young cornerstones (or were) to Wall and McGee.
Back to the 2-guard point. Does Dunleavy JR get a long contract from somewhere else? If so, it may just make sense to trade for that stop gap 2 if it means getting a nice asset (pick etc) to go along with it. The question is what teams have 2-guards with semi lenghthy deals that would give the Wizards any incentives to take on those contracts. Here is my list (not my suggestions) of those teams that currently employ such 2-guards or wings, that they may be willing to trade them along with a pick just to clear out their cap perhaps, and/or have other players needing those minutes etc.
Detroit - Richard Hamilton
Indiana - Dahntay Jones
Lakers - Luke Walton
New Jersey - Travis Outlaw
Phoenix - Josh Childress
DaRealHibachi wrote:Jay81 wrote:What about the OKC model machine that took Harden over Tyreke Evans?
I think it worked out for the best; Evans being ball-dominant will not fit next to Westbrook... Harden doesn't need the ball to be effective...

nate33 wrote:One other thought about the OKC model: it allowed them to negotiate that Nick Collison contract. We could employ the same tactic over and over again. When Nick is a free agent this summer, front load his salary so he is paid $12M, $3M, $3M, $3M. Next year, when McGee is a free agent (assuming he turns the corner and is worth $7M a year) front load his salary too: $15M, $5M, $5M, $5M, $5M). The idea is to get all these borderline starting-caliber players locked up at a backup's salary. That way, we don't have to let guys like Booker and Seraphin walk when they're free agents. Also, the guys we have locked up at below-market salary will become good trading pieces down the road.

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:eitanr wrote:The Bulls model probably makes a lot more sense specifically to the Wizards franchise as Rose and Noah are two similar young cornerstones (or were) to Wall and McGee.
Back to the 2-guard point. Does Dunleavy JR get a long contract from somewhere else? If so, it may just make sense to trade for that stop gap 2 if it means getting a nice asset (pick etc) to go along with it. The question is what teams have 2-guards with semi lenghthy deals that would give the Wizards any incentives to take on those contracts. Here is my list (not my suggestions) of those teams that currently employ such 2-guards or wings, that they may be willing to trade them along with a pick just to clear out their cap perhaps, and/or have other players needing those minutes etc.
Detroit - Richard Hamilton
Indiana - Dahntay Jones
Lakers - Luke Walton
New Jersey - Travis Outlaw
Phoenix - Josh Childress
eitanr, the two things I don't like about Dunleavy are his Injury history and him being on losing teams. Otherwise, I think he might be a good fit for reasons you covered.
Funny you listed Childress. I saw Phoenix on the nationally-televised game yesterday. Jeff Van Gundy was commenting on how many team's wanted Childress when he returned from Greece, but how things have not worked out with Phoenix. He said Phoenix was just loaded at SF with Hill, Dudley (who already had the spot), Warrick, etc. I think Josh is still the same player he was at ATL.
Childress has holes in his game but is a tremendous finisher and a great rebounder at SG. Very unselfish, his numbers at ATL were high on Win Score and PER. IiRC he was a league leader in true shooting. His deal matches Blatche's.
I wonder if Phoenix wants to dump him badly enough to swap Childress and their first for Blatche and Wizard second? To me, If the Wizards draft a stud PF, Andray either goes to C or sixth man. He won't be effective defensively at C and he doesn't want to come off the bench. With another first, Washington can grab Faried or Benson or JaJuan Joseph or Jordan Williams--each decent prospects.
I would take Chidress and Faried for Blatche.

Hoopalotta wrote:Edit --> Of course it could be argued that Blatche isn't of the sort of temperament to where you want to front load things up like the Nick Collison deal. It sounds good in the abstract, but......

tontoz wrote:Childress would be a horrible fit here. The last thing this team needs is a wing player who can't score outside 5 feet or play defense, especially with that contract.

LyricalRico wrote:Hoopalotta wrote:Edit --> Of course it could be argued that Blatche isn't of the sort of temperament to where you want to front load things up like the Nick Collison deal. It sounds good in the abstract, but......
Good point. I'm also questioning if guys like Young/McGee would really be good candidates for that type of contract.
nate33 wrote:tontoz wrote:Childress would be a horrible fit here. The last thing this team needs is a wing player who can't score outside 5 feet or play defense, especially with that contract.
I agree completely. Childress makes no sense at all. The only motivation seems to be the desire to get Blatche out of here at all costs. I don't get it. Even if Blatche isn't a starting-caliber player, I'd rather have him as our backup big than Childress as our backup wing.
Besides, given Blatche's recent surge before the shoulder injury, it's looking more and more like Blatche's sub par performance was due to injury rather than a total regression in ability. If, when healthy, Blatche can get back to being an 18 and 9 type of player with mediocre efficiency, he should at least be movable again. We could trade him for a 2012 expiring and maybe even a pick.
I'm generally of the opinion that we'll never win with Blatche, but that doesn't mean we should dump him at all costs. We need to be patient. In the meantime, we're better off with him as our backup big or maybe our starting center.
nate33 wrote:Okay. "Poor" efficiency if the term "mediocre" violates your sensibilities. My point is, the injury may explain why he dropped from last seasons poor efficiency to this year's outright abysmal efficiency. If Blatche can post a TS% around 51-52% again while scoring 18 points, other teams would be interested in him. Nobody wants him right now with his .487 TS%
J-Blaze wrote:all we gotta do is draft kanter, williams, jones, barnes. and add a bunch of shooters to his squad for wall to kick it out too then we should be good. resign nick. get a coach to get on mcgees a** and make him a top 5 center in this league. blatche is stillr real good to me hes just injured. let kevin and booker continue to grow into good role players. and am i the only one that thinks Jordan Crawford can become the next Gilbert Arenas on this team? i mean he can score at will and also makes great passes. or am i just tripping?

Nivek wrote:nate33 wrote:Okay. "Poor" efficiency if the term "mediocre" violates your sensibilities. My point is, the injury may explain why he dropped from last seasons poor efficiency to this year's outright abysmal efficiency. If Blatche can post a TS% around 51-52% again while scoring 18 points, other teams would be interested in him. Nobody wants him right now with his .487 TS%
Much better.