JonathanJoseph wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:cb1115 wrote:Magic fan here. So, let me ask you guys something. Do any of you honestly think Gil will become the go-to score we need him to be or did we trade for an $18 million backup who's gonna shoot 34% for the rest of his career?
That.
He might get his FG% up to 40 again on open threes if he works with Grover this summer and receives pretty miraculous treatment that restores his knee cartilage and/or reverses arthritis.
Most likely is that it's downhill from here for Gilbert's career. Your team would be much better off with Jordan Crawford.
You say "most likely" but your most likely scenario is going against a 95%+ historical precedent. Perhaps Arenas is the exception, but you are talking about an exception and not the rule.
Regardless of the particulars, saying that a team is better off with a SG with 11 NBA starts shooting less than 40% FG than a multiple time, All-NBA player who's only 29 is more than a little far fetched at this point. You are comparing the best case Crawford to the worst case Arenas and calling it even.
You are entitled to your opinion.
Over 15 games in March, Crawford did shoot 39%. He also, as a rookie averaged 18.2 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 3.7 assists. In the history of the league here are the 33 rookies that have averaged 18/3/3 (10 are Hall of Famers). Among the active players are Blake Griffin, Tyreke Evans, Grant Hill, Lebron James.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... te_base=36JJ, you might say Crawford's March was a fluke. He had a triple double his first game in April. With Wall out of the lineup. He had 21 points, 10 rebounds, 11 assists on .444 FG and .500 3PT shooting. Today, he upped that to 23 points (.500 FG and .400 3PT), 5 assists, 3 rebounds 2 steals.
Prior to today, as a starter, Crawford has averaged 21.2 points, 4.8 assists, 4.5 rebounds.
Regardless of Gil's status, I believe the Magic would be better with Crawford.