UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Moderator: lilfishi22
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Banco
- Junior
- Posts: 251
- And1: 36
- Joined: Jul 08, 2006
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Damn Bader is getting cut lol.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Banco
- Junior
- Posts: 251
- And1: 36
- Joined: Jul 08, 2006
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Chuck lookin salty that Tito won
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,901
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
WTF happened? I thought that was a good time for a break considering the combatants.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Tito still got it lol.
Bader meh.
Bader meh.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
-
spykelee
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 15,469
- And1: 3,334
- Joined: Sep 14, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Bernman wrote:WTF happened? I thought that was a good time for a break considering the combatants.
Tito caught Bader with a punch and stunned him. He then jumped on him and sunk in a Guilitone and Bader tapped.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
-
spykelee
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 15,469
- And1: 3,334
- Joined: Sep 14, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Upon some reflection, Do you just do Condit VS GSP post Diaz, or do you maybe do Condit vs Fitch # 1 contenders match??
I'd like to see Condit GSP, but don't want these guys just sitting on the sidelines waiting...
I'd like to see Condit GSP, but don't want these guys just sitting on the sidelines waiting...
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
G-Sot and Bader...two hype trains de-railed already tonight.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,901
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
spykelee wrote:Bernman wrote:WTF happened? I thought that was a good time for a break considering the combatants.
Tito caught Bader with a punch and stunned him. He then jumped on him and sunk in a Guilitone and Bader tapped.
Anything can happen in a fight, I suppose.
The biggest implication of that fight is Bones' resume taking a hit. He certainly is impressive to the naked eye, but he beat Hamill (deserved to), Bader, Vera, Matyshenko, and Shogun when he was possibly a shell of his former self to win a title. Something to think about.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Bernman wrote:Anything can happen in a fight, I suppose.
That was probably the second most likely outcome behind "Bader by unanimous decision", although the latter was obviously much more likely.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
-
spykelee
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 15,469
- And1: 3,334
- Joined: Sep 14, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
I don't think Wiman stole that round by being on top... at least not on my score card.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
There still isn't a fight in mma I'd rather see than Condit/Diaz.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,901
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
spykelee wrote:I don't think Wiman stole that round by being on top... at least not on my score card.
It's American MMA judging....
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Bernman wrote:spykelee wrote:I don't think Wiman stole that round by being on top... at least not on my score card.
It's American MMA judging....
God I hope you are wrong about this, although unfortunately you probably aren't.
Not bc I am rooting for Siver, but because Siver won the round imo.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,901
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
This is the ground and pound he displayed against Cole Miller. On top it pays to have short arms.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
-
spykelee
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 15,469
- And1: 3,334
- Joined: Sep 14, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Tough fight to score here... Be interesting to see how the judges score this one
Personally, I think Siver wins 29-28
Personally, I think Siver wins 29-28
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,901
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Close fight. Wiman probably did more damage, in addition to having the control. All comes down to rounds 1 and 3. 29-28 Wiman.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
No idea how to score that one.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,901
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Well, I'm out 10 bucks. That's a REALLY surprising decision given the judging precedent lately. I can't be overly mad about it because it was close and they finally favored the stand-up guy and non-American, but I thought Wiman edged him.
I'm curious if judges are conferring these days with all these inexplicable UD's. When I heard a UD I could have sworn that meant Wiman was being awarded the decision. The only clear victory of a round was Wiman in round 2. How did they all agree on 6 debatable scores, especially given the American and wrestling bias lately. That's very curious to me.
I'm curious if judges are conferring these days with all these inexplicable UD's. When I heard a UD I could have sworn that meant Wiman was being awarded the decision. The only clear victory of a round was Wiman in round 2. How did they all agree on 6 debatable scores, especially given the American and wrestling bias lately. That's very curious to me.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
- SpReEfOrAlL
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,330
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jul 29, 2002
- Location: July 2010!
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Man I love Melvin. He is gonna be a tough fight for anyone.
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
-
spykelee
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 15,469
- And1: 3,334
- Joined: Sep 14, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)
Bernman wrote:Well, I'm out 10 bucks. That's a REALLY surprising decision given the judging precedent lately. I can't be overly mad about it because it was close and they finally favored the stand-up guy and non-American, but I thought Wiman edged him.
I'm curious if judges are conferring these days with all these inexplicable UD's. When I heard a UD I could have sworn that mean Wiman was being awarded the decision. The only clear victory of a round was Wiman in round 2. How did all 3 judges agree those 6 times?
I thought the same thing when I heard UD.
However for me at least, I gave Siver round 1 and 3. It came down to whether or not round 2 was a 10 8 round. If Wiman held that takedown in round 3, I think he may have gotten the nod. but getting it reversed, and then getting rocked afterwards certainly didn't help his cause.
Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts



