ImageImageImageImageImage

POTG: WAS @ POR

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

Who was the player of the game?

Wall
13
37%
Young
20
57%
McGee
0
No votes
Booker
0
No votes
Crawford
1
3%
Vesely
1
3%
 
Total votes: 35

Jimmy Recard
RealGM
Posts: 10,386
And1: 5,812
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
 

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#21 » by Jimmy Recard » Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:29 pm

basketboule wrote:is booker on his way out of the rotation?

Not likely. He just had a rough game last night and was in foul trouble.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,088
And1: 22,491
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#22 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:00 pm

basketboule wrote:is booker on his way out of the rotation?

Booker made the most important play of the game.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,088
And1: 22,491
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#23 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:02 pm

DallasShalDune wrote:Wall set up Young. Young hit amazing shots, which opened the floor up for Wall. Co-MVPs. The other 3 options were good as well! Even Crawford.

How bad is Portland defensively? I had no idea.

Yup. I have no problems giving POTG to Wall. I'm just objecting to the notion that it's not debatable.

I'm giving it to Young mainly to compensate for the all the hate he has received on these boards. But Wall was fabulous too.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,527
And1: 5,693
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#24 » by spree2kawhi » Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:04 pm

thanks. got him on my fantasy squad... so I'll keep him.
REDardWIZskin
Senior
Posts: 716
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Location: DC

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#25 » by REDardWIZskin » Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:25 pm

This is probably the hardest one to choose all season. Wall set the tone early. Crawford turned into Lou Williams in the 2nd quarter. And Young was insane down the stretch.
Sit back and watch WALL WORK!! >:-)
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#26 » by Ruzious » Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:26 pm

I voted Young by a hair over Wall - using the scorched earth policy.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,251
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#27 » by tontoz » Wed Feb 15, 2012 2:14 pm

Nick was insanely hot but i might have voted for Wall anyway if it wasn't for his turnovers. Had to go with Nick.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
GhostsOfGil
General Manager
Posts: 8,506
And1: 899
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#28 » by GhostsOfGil » Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:28 pm

DallasShalDune wrote:How bad is Portland defensively? I had no idea.


Portland is pretty good. Ranked 4th in DRtg at 98.4
User avatar
3gbrrrfkyt
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,722
And1: 144
Joined: Nov 01, 2010

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#29 » by 3gbrrrfkyt » Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:31 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vR_jtSV1eBQ[/youtube]
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,521
And1: 10,289
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#30 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:48 pm

nate33 wrote:
basketboule wrote:is booker on his way out of the rotation?

Booker made the most important play of the game.


Booker has been studying vintage Bruce Bowen, "How to Maim the Shooter" technique video.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
CaPtaiN eYeSaNo
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The poster formerly known as Gil_Kills
     

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#31 » by CaPtaiN eYeSaNo » Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:52 pm

Had to go with Nick. He was the comeback dream shatterer
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,336
And1: 6,705
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#32 » by TGW » Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:11 pm

nate33 wrote:
basketboule wrote:is booker on his way out of the rotation?

Booker made the most important play of the game.


ROFL I was trying to remember what play that was.

I see what you did there.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#33 » by hands11 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 6:21 pm

Add team to future polls.

Some games it is clear who the POTG is. At times, it is just a fact that there isn't one.

I can't really see how you can pick Nick or Wall with any clear reasoning. Hell, even Crawford, Ves and McGee had huge effects. That McGee put back in crunch time made a huge difference because Portland was making a serious run. 11 rebounds and 18 pts. Ves was grabbing all kinds of rebounds and playing really sound defense and with Booker and Singleton in foul trouble they wouldn't have won without hm. Crawford was also hot an made several important shots and passes. Down the stretch he score, intercepted the ball in the back-court and scored again. Four pts swing in like 4 seconds.

People in the game thread though a collapse was on the way.

I cast my vote of team because that's what it was so I'm not voting in this poll without that as an option.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,088
And1: 22,491
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#34 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:06 pm

hands11 wrote:Add team to future polls.

Some games it is clear who the POTG is. At times, it is just a fact that there isn't one.

I can't really see how you can pick Nick or Wall with any clear reasoning. Hell, even Crawford, Ves and McGee had huge effects. That McGee put back in crunch time made a huge difference because Portland was making a serious run. 11 rebounds and 18 pts. Ves was grabbing all kinds of rebounds and playing really sound defense and with Booker and Singleton in foul trouble they wouldn't have won without hm. Crawford was also hot an made several important shots and passes. Down the stretch he score, intercepted the ball in the back-court and scored again. Four pts swing in like 4 seconds.

People in the game thread though a collapse was on the way.

I cast my vote of team because that's what it was so I'm not voting in this poll without that as an option.

One of the purposes of the POTG thread is to have a final tally of POTG's at the end of the season. Throwing in options like "team", or "coach Wittman" or "opposing player who sucked real bad" messes up the results.

It's fine if you want to vote "team". I'm just not going to put it in the poll because I will ignore all such answers in the final tally anyhow.
User avatar
DallasShalDune
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,395
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 23, 2003
Location: Kansas City
Contact:

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#35 » by DallasShalDune » Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:34 pm

nate33 wrote:
hands11 wrote:Add team to future polls.

Some games it is clear who the POTG is. At times, it is just a fact that there isn't one.

I can't really see how you can pick Nick or Wall with any clear reasoning. Hell, even Crawford, Ves and McGee had huge effects. That McGee put back in crunch time made a huge difference because Portland was making a serious run. 11 rebounds and 18 pts. Ves was grabbing all kinds of rebounds and playing really sound defense and with Booker and Singleton in foul trouble they wouldn't have won without hm. Crawford was also hot an made several important shots and passes. Down the stretch he score, intercepted the ball in the back-court and scored again. Four pts swing in like 4 seconds.

People in the game thread though a collapse was on the way.

I cast my vote of team because that's what it was so I'm not voting in this poll without that as an option.

One of the purposes of the POTG thread is to have a final tally of POTG's at the end of the season. Throwing in options like "team", or "coach Wittman" or "opposing player who sucked real bad" messes up the results.

It's fine if you want to vote "team". I'm just not going to put it in the poll because I will ignore all such answers in the final tally anyhow.

What's the tally so far, nate?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,088
And1: 22,491
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#36 » by nate33 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:28 pm

I don't know. I haven't been keeping a running count.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: POTG: WAS @ POR 

Post#37 » by hands11 » Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:23 am

nate33 wrote:
hands11 wrote:Add team to future polls.

Some games it is clear who the POTG is. At times, it is just a fact that there isn't one.

I can't really see how you can pick Nick or Wall with any clear reasoning. Hell, even Crawford, Ves and McGee had huge effects. That McGee put back in crunch time made a huge difference because Portland was making a serious run. 11 rebounds and 18 pts. Ves was grabbing all kinds of rebounds and playing really sound defense and with Booker and Singleton in foul trouble they wouldn't have won without hm. Crawford was also hot an made several important shots and passes. Down the stretch he score, intercepted the ball in the back-court and scored again. Four pts swing in like 4 seconds.

People in the game thread though a collapse was on the way.

I cast my vote of team because that's what it was so I'm not voting in this poll without that as an option.

One of the purposes of the POTG thread is to have a final tally of POTG's at the end of the season. Throwing in options like "team", or "coach Wittman" or "opposing player who sucked real bad" messes up the results.

It's fine if you want to vote "team". I'm just not going to put it in the poll because I will ignore all such answers in the final tally anyhow.


You will do what you want of course, but why would team throw it off. Actually, I think it would make it more accurate. POTG should be awarded when there is one. If there isn't, there isn't.

If they win a set amount of games with 2 or more players contributing equally and that wins as the vote, that would be a nice number to see. If the majority of fans choice to select that, then that is a tally. If they don't, then what is the harm of having it there?

Personally, I find it inconsistent considering I was bashed for not adding an F to how good is EG doing when it as clear F was not close to a reasonable choice. Just saying.

Return to Washington Wizards