Woelfel - 70% bogut's gone and maybe Jennings (update pg131)

Post #1521 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:22 pm

WEFFPIM wrote:I think you all should spend the next 72 hours on this board waiting for something to happen

Twirl: "Duh!"

mlloyd10 · Post #1522 » by **mlloyd10** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:22 pm

I can see Bogut and Jennings for Ellis and Curry. Warriors have Thompson waiting to step in.

yoyomayoma · Post #1523 » by **yoyomayoma** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:23 pm

Jamal makes me nauseous. :giveup:

Why does Bogut want to toy with us?

EastSideBucksFan · Post #1524 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:26 pm

OK, he's officially trolling us.

Andrew Bogut
Panera ran out of my favorite soup, but rest assured the worker went to the back and they had a whole new batch! #GreatNews!
Like · · @AndrewMBogut on Twitter

mcfromage · Post #1525 » by **mcfromage** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:26 pm

AHahahaha

Andrew Bogut ‏ @AndrewMBogut Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Panera ran out of my favorite soup, but rest assured the worker went to the back and they had a whole new batch! #GreatNews!

Post #1526 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:27 pm

I will say this...BuckPack may be privy to one potential trade on the table, but that doesn't mean that's the only trade on the table. No matter what happens, BP could say "told you so" or "that's not what I was hearing."

Not that I'm anti-BuckPack or anything. I am just skeptical of message board "insiders" by nature. It's one thing to know that a player is on the block, but it's another to know that a specific deal is on the table when we don't have any other legitimate sources leaking anything about it.

jerrod · Post #1527 » by **jerrod** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:28 pm

so they didn't really run out then, did they?

what an ijury prone liar

JayMKE · Post #1528 » by **JayMKE** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:28 pm

win tonight and Knicks loss puts us in as the 8th seed

they play the Bulls

hello Jamal Crawford win now trade

Newz · Post #1529 » by **Newz** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:30 pm

humanrefutation wrote:I will say this...BuckPack may be privy to one potential trade on the table, but that doesn't mean that's the only trade on the table. No matter what happens, BP could say "told you so" or "that's not what I was hearing."

Not that I'm anti-BuckPack or anything. I am just skeptical of message board "insiders" by nature. It's one thing to know that a player is on the block, but it's another to know that a specific deal is on the table when we don't have any other legitimate sources leaking anything about it.

Definitely agree with this.

Anyone could come on here and post the same stuff. It's pretty easy to make it up:

"From what I've heard, the Bucks have several offers on the table for Andrew Bogut. Some of them they are taking very serious, but others they have no interest in. The one with the most interest is from a lottery team who would want to send us a young guard as one of the primary pieces."

icat2000 · Post #1530 » by **icat2000** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:32 pm

Hasn't BuckPack been correct a couple of times in the past.

raferfenix · Post #1531 » by **raferfenix** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:33 pm

Just read Sam Amick's piece on Evans. He'd certainly constitute a trade with risks tool:

Evans' future in Sacramento uncertain

While it's not known whether the Kings (14-27) have fielded calls regarding Tyreke Evans, it's safe to say the third-year player's long-term future with the team is uncertain.

The 2009-10 Rookie of the Year is no longer considered the centerpiece of the Kings' new core, with that distinction clearly belonging to second-year center DeMarcus Cousins. Evans is eligible for an extension this summer but it's looking unlikely to be offered one unless he shows major improvement.

His poor outside shooting remains an issue, and Evans' role changed drastically last month when he was moved from the point guard spot to small forward. Coach Keith Smart is using him as a point forward at times, a move that was inspired both by the poor play of veteran small forward John Salmons and the surprisingly good play of rookie point guard Isaiah Thomas. But the 6-foot-6 Evans is struggling with the adjustment, in large part because he isn't used to playing off the ball so frequently or not having a significant size advantage over his counterpart. The presence of guard Marcus Thornton has changed matters, too, as he is leading the team in shots per game at 15.5 (to Evans' 15.2 and Cousins' 14.2).

Evans, who has one season remaining on his rookie contract and could be a restricted free agent next summer, simply doesn't shine like he did in his debut. And if the Kings are convinced that Evans is likely gone after next season, they might be willing to move him for someone who can help expedite this slowest of rebuilding efforts.

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/w ... z1ove0PRfh

JayMKE · Post #1532 » by **JayMKE** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:33 pm

the deals we might of been considering a week ago probably aren't the same as now

last week we didn't win 3 in a row

we're back in the hunt baby

Bernman · Post #1533 » by **Bernman** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:34 pm

BP has a good track record. He's not wichmae.

Post #1534 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:37 pm

Bernman wrote:BP has a good track record. He's not wichmae.

Good track record for what, exactly? Reporting trade offers that are so utterly ambiguous that his credibility isn't on the line whatsoever?

What has he called before? I'm actually curious.

BuckPack · Post #1535 » by **BuckPack** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:39 pm

icat2000 wrote:
stevescheffler06 wrote:
If this is tied to the Bogues tweet I'm going to throw up my face.

ETA - If it's Bucks related at all I'm going to be pissed. F that guy.

Didn't BuckPack say the deal would make most of us happy. Does Jamal make you happy.

Guys, I do not work in the Bucks front office--I don't know any and every deal on the table. I do not pretend to know anywhere close to all of the interworkings in the Bucks FO nor have I ever suggested that I do. Hard for anyone besides the select few working in the organization to know what's going on at any and all times. Furthermore, not everything that I post is intended to be from what I glean from the Bucks (some of it includes my own opinions). So let's not make me out to be Deep Throat, here and let's not take everything that I expect to happen to be gospel. There's just too many variables at play.

I can and have posted a few very relevant and true things, but I'm not (can't) going to post the specific deal(s). I'll provide what I can--believe it or disbelieve it as you choose. I'm not looking to be an internet hero or insider. Just a guy contributing to the discussion about a franchise that we all love.

REDDzone · Post #1536 » by **REDDzone** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:41 pm

Bernman wrote:BP has a good track record. He's not wichmae.

fasho

icat2000 · Post #1537 » by **icat2000** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:42 pm

No worries. I think we just all starving for a little glimmer of hope that it making us all go a bit around the twist.

BucksRUS · Post #1538 » by **BucksRUS** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:42 pm

Steve Kyler‏@stevekylerNBA

RT @MP2474: @arrod Ruldolph of said sources say no D12 trade, Magic on verge of a blockbuster deal.. <-- He is a smart man.

Bernman · Post #1539 » by **Bernman** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:42 pm

BuckPack wrote:Guys, I do not work in the Bucks front office--I don't know any and every deal on the table. I do not pretend to know anywhere close to all of the interworkings in the Bucks FO nor have I ever suggested that I do. Hard for anyone besides the select few working in the organization to know what's going on at any and all times. Furthermore, not everything that I post is intended to be from what I glean from the Bucks (some of it includes my own opinions). So let's not make me out to be Deep Throat, here and let's not take everything that I expect to happen to be gospel. There's just too many variables at play.

I can and have posted a few very relevant and true things, but I'm not (can't) going to post the specific deal(s). I'll provide what I can--believe it or disbelieve it as you choose. I'm not looking to be an internet hero or insider. Just a guy contributing to the discussion about a franchise that we all love.

Well said.

Post #1540 » by **jr lucosa** » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:43 pm

I for one appreciate the posts BP. Thanks for keeping us in the loop as much as you can.