The Conundrum that is LeBron James

Moderator: Doctor MJ

User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#121 » by Wannabe MEP » Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:27 pm

rrravenred wrote:Out of interest, what're the Def Rtgs for those two lineups?

Updated after the weekend:

Nash-Hill-Dudley-Frye-Gortat --
Off Rtg: 113.92, Def Rtg: 101.15, Overall Rtg: +12.77, Adj +/-: +10.18 (727.83 min)
Chalmers-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Anthony --
Off Rtg: 109.12, Def Rtg: 96.72, Overall Rtg: +12.40, Adj +/-: +7.46 (449.47 min)
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#122 » by Wannabe MEP » Wed Apr 4, 2012 5:02 am

Since the season's midpoint, there are 79 units that have played at least 50 minutes. Of those 79 units, Chalmers-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Anthony is ranked #57 In points per 100 possessions at 101.6 (197.8 minutes).

:jawdrop:
User avatar
toodles23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,115
And1: 3,538
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#123 » by toodles23 » Wed Apr 4, 2012 7:30 am

Los Soles wrote:Since the season's midpoint, there are 79 units that have played at least 50 minutes. Of those 79 units, Chalmers-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Anthony is ranked #57 In points per 100 possessions at 101.6 (197.8 minutes).

:jawdrop:

That's terrible, but I'm not too surprised. Joel Anthony is the biggest offensive liability in the league.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#124 » by Wannabe MEP » Wed Apr 4, 2012 8:10 pm

toodles23 wrote:That's terrible, but I'm not too surprised. Joel Anthony is the biggest offensive liability in the league.

Chalmer-Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Haslem 100.00 points per 100 possessions in 112.62 minutes this season.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#125 » by mopper8 » Thu Apr 5, 2012 1:17 pm

Oh come on, you're better than that. For the balance of the season, that lineup in total is at a 108.8 Ortg. The fact that they had a slump, which seemed to revolve around Chalmers losing his stroke and Bosh having mental issues, and not really anything to do with the supposed incompatibility of Wade and Lebron, doesn't detract from the fact that the unit overall has been excellent for the entire season.

Cherry picking the worst stretch and suggesting its more representative than the larger sample size from which its been pulled is both bad statistics and dishonest.
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#126 » by mopper8 » Thu Apr 5, 2012 1:32 pm

Just to buttress the point...

Mario Chalmers
Pre-All-Star 11.4 ppg, 51% fg, 46% 3p
Post-All-Star 8.4 ppg, 37% fg, 31% 3p

Chris Bosh
Pre-All-Star 18.4 ppg, 49.4% fg, 8.4 rpg
Post-All-Star 16.8 ppg, 46.5% fg, 6.4 rpg

Not only is it bad statistical analysis, you didn't seem to make any effort to actually figure out why the numbers looked like they did. Please explain how its Lebron and Wade's fault that all of a sudden Mario Chalmers can't hit the ocean from the beach on wide-open 3 pointers, or why Bosh dropped 2 rebounds/game seemingly out of nowhere.

And I don't know why it would shock anyone that an offense struggles when the two players most responsible for spacing the floor seem to both totally lose their touch offensively.

Also, pointing out that the unit featuring Haslem hasn't looked better than the one with Joel isn't really illustrative of anything when you realize that Haslem has shot 43% for the season.
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#127 » by Wannabe MEP » Thu Apr 5, 2012 2:16 pm

wow, a wee bit defensive, aren't we? I just pointed out what I thought many would find a surprising stat. The recent trend, no more, no less. I didn't extrapolate: you did that on your own.
Chicago76
Rookie
Posts: 1,134
And1: 229
Joined: Jan 08, 2006

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#128 » by Chicago76 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 6:37 am

Here's something interesting. There are 19 Heat floor combinations that basketballvalue has now listed as "statistically significant" with respect to total minutes for a given lineup.

9 of them contain both James and Wade. Those lineups have played for 895 minutes and averaged 107.6 pts/100.

The other 10 are missing one or both of Wade and James. Those lineups have played for 697 minutes and averaged 110.4 pts/100.

Just interesting to point out that the Heat have been more efficient offensive with only one or neither of James and Wade on the court.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#129 » by mopper8 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 2:19 pm

Los Soles wrote:wow, a wee bit defensive, aren't we? I just pointed out what I thought many would find a surprising stat. The recent trend, no more, no less. I didn't extrapolate: you did that on your own.


All your posts in this thread seem agenda-driven.

Chicago76 wrote:Here's something interesting. There are 19 Heat floor combinations that basketballvalue has now listed as "statistically significant" with respect to total minutes for a given lineup.

9 of them contain both James and Wade. Those lineups have played for 895 minutes and averaged 107.6 pts/100.

The other 10 are missing one or both of Wade and James. Those lineups have played for 697 minutes and averaged 110.4 pts/100.

Just interesting to point out that the Heat have been more efficient offensive with only one or neither of James and Wade on the court.


This is interesting though.

I still think there's something very simple going on with those two, in theory/by the eye test at least. Which is that they need at least 2 floors spacers on the court when they play together. In theory, Chalmers, Bosh, Haslem, Battier, Miller, and Jones all can provide spacing. Problem is guys like Joel and Cole do not provide spacing, and Haslem and Battier have both struggled with their shot. So that only leaves Chalmers, Miller, Bosh, and Jones as guys who can space the floor (and Miller has been out for awhile injured). As a result, Miami can really only get 2 floor spacers on the floor if (a) Wade plays point, (b) Lebron plays PF, or (c) they're in their starting lineup

And when either of Chalmers or Bosh struggles (as they have post-ASB), the starting lineup doesn't work either.

I'd be interested to see if that plays out in the lineups you mentioned
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#130 » by mopper8 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 2:59 pm

Chicago76 wrote:Here's something interesting. There are 19 Heat floor combinations that basketballvalue has now listed as "statistically significant" with respect to total minutes for a given lineup.

9 of them contain both James and Wade. Those lineups have played for 895 minutes and averaged 107.6 pts/100.

The other 10 are missing one or both of Wade and James. Those lineups have played for 697 minutes and averaged 110.4 pts/100.

Just interesting to point out that the Heat have been more efficient offensive with only one or neither of James and Wade on the court.


So I sorted by Ortg and am looking at the spread. 3 Wade/James lineups above the median for those 19 lineups. The median lineup is also a Wade/James lineup. 4 Wade/James lineups below the median. Seems a pretty even spread. BTW, median Ortg is 110.17

Some observations:
Norris Cole plays in 9 of those lineups. 6 of the 9 lineups below the median feature Cole, including their 2 very worst lineups (by far), but of the 3 he's in above the median, 2 are Miami's very best offensive lineups. Weird distribution there.

The Bosh/Haslem frontcourt seems really ineffective. 6 of the 9 lineups below the median feature those two, and the median lineup also features those two, and only 1 of the lineups above the median has them playing together. That being said, Cole/Wade/Miller/Haslem/Bosh has an Ortg of 124.1

Joel Anthony is in 8 of the units. 2 below the median, and 6 (!) above the median. Of the 9 lineups above the median, 6 have either Joel at C or Lebron at PF or both. Below the median, no Lebron at PF and only 2 with JA.

Not sure what to make of that. But it seems like Miami simply plays much better offensively with Joel on the court than Haslem.
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#131 » by mopper8 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 3:25 pm

Here's my rudimentary paint skills at work: statistically significant lineups from basketball value, sorted by descending Ortg, with all those other low minute lineups deleted:

Image

Sorry about the size...unavoidable. You have to open in a new tab and give it a couple zooms to get a readable chart

edit: looking at it like that, the Haslem/Bosh frontcourt really jumps out (IMO) as being particularly bad...if you look at 108 as the cut off (since that's still a pretty great Ortg relative to league average, and there's a big drop from the unit posting a 108.81 and the next unit, putting up 104.95)...the worst lineups feature:

Haslem/Bosh
Haslem/Pittman
Haslem/Bosh
Haslem/Bosh
Haslem/Bosh
Haslem/Bosh
Haslem/Bosh
Bosh/Anthony

The 2/3 combos in those lineups aren't nearly as consistent, and feature a lot of Wade or Lebron + shooter:

Battier/Lebron
Battier/Lebron
Battier/Miller
Wade/Lebron
Battier/Lebron
Wade/Lebron
Wade/Battier
Wade/Lebron

Although Battier's name jumps out there too, he's also in 7 lineups with Ortgs of 108 or better. While the Haslem/Bosh frontcourt is only in 2 such lineups.
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#132 » by Wannabe MEP » Fri Apr 6, 2012 3:42 pm

mopper8 wrote:All your posts in this thread seem agenda-driven.

No agenda, bro. I don't have any horses in this one. Just an idea; something interesting that I noticed and starting trying to figure out. My team is the Suns and they've never made it to the finals to have an Eastern Conference rival :lol:

Chicago76 wrote:Here's something interesting. There are 19 Heat floor combinations that basketballvalue has now listed as "statistically significant" with respect to total minutes for a given lineup.

9 of them contain both James and Wade. Those lineups have played for 895 minutes and averaged 107.6 pts/100.

The other 10 are missing one or both of Wade and James. Those lineups have played for 697 minutes and averaged 110.4 pts/100.

Just interesting to point out that the Heat have been more efficient offensive with only one or neither of James and Wade on the court.

Nice work, bro. This is something I've been meaning to do; just been lazy. Did you just average the Off Rtgs themselves, or did you actually add up the possessions and points and recalculate the total Off Rtg? I'm thinking of doing that going back to last year's data too.

mopper8 wrote:This is interesting though.

I still think there's something very simple going on with those two, in theory/by the eye test at least. Which is that they need at least 2 floors spacers on the court when they play together.

:lol: I don't get it. This is a foundational idea of the whole thread, yo. I've been saying roughly that idea for 9 pages. (Although I admit I introed the whole thing rather poorly.) I'm just taking it a little farther, than you: I think LeBron and Wade are each better with three floor-spacers on the court with them, which is why I think they're a poor fit with each other. (Also, ideally the stretch-4 is even stretchier than Bosh, but that one is certainly debatable).
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#133 » by mopper8 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 3:48 pm

I don't get it. This is a foundational idea of the whole thread, yo. I've been saying roughly that idea for 9 pages. (Although I admit I introed the whole thing rather poorly.) I'm just taking it a little farther, than you: I think LeBron and Wade are each better with three floor-spacers on the court with them, which is why I think they're a poor fit with each other. (Also, ideally the stretch-4 is even stretchier than Bosh, but that one is certainly debatable).


That's not how I've read it at all, and either you're misrepresenting yourself now or you did before. The foundational idea of the thread seems to me about replacing either Wade or Lebron, not about what surrounds them. As you've said, next to Lebron James, James Jones is a "better" offensive player than Dwyane Wade. My point is that I don't think that's necessarily true if you have adequate floor spacing from at least 2 other players on the floor.

For example, this post:

Los Soles wrote:Battier going to Miami makes LeBron significantly less relevant for Miami than he was.

Shooter+Wade+Battier+Bosh+Center is on par with any lineup that includes LeBron, unless...
1) Wade doesn't stay healthy.
2) They start experimenting with LeBron at the 4. Problem with that is I'm not sure Bosh can hold down the 5.


And I'm saying I would take Shooter+Wade+Lebron+Bosh+Center over that, as long as both Bosh and the "shooter" are actually hitting their shots.
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#134 » by Wannabe MEP » Fri Apr 6, 2012 4:57 pm

ok, right, I meant the value of spacing with shooters in general.

Edit: I also was referring to Chicago76's contribution.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#135 » by mopper8 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 5:01 pm

Fair enough ;)

What do you make of how seemingly awful the Haslem/Bosh front court is? I can't seem to make much sense of it myself. Only thing I can think of is that they both seem to like to operate in similar areas, and because of Haslem's injury last year, they never really got much of a chance to work out how to space the floor with one another as a result.

edit: ran the numbers.

Haslem/Bosh, from the 19 lineups, have 990 possessions together, with an Ortg of 103.54
From the remaining 11 lineups, all other frontcourts have 2025 possessions together, with an Ortg of 111.31

That's a shocking difference IMO
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#136 » by Wannabe MEP » Fri Apr 6, 2012 5:28 pm

I think that's just Haslem in general:
On Court Off Rtg: 103.89
Off Court Off Rtg: 112.22
Net: -8.33

I think it's probably just small sample size that has some Anthony/Haslem combos that are a little better. Those combos are pretty low minutes. But Haslem is ok to have on the court with the right wings combos.
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#137 » by mopper8 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 5:35 pm

That's shockingly bad. Haslem has struggled offensively by the eye test, but certainly I wouldn't have guessed his numbers look like that, especially given his big minutes
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#138 » by Wannabe MEP » Fri Apr 6, 2012 6:00 pm

All Heat units from last year's playoffs that played at least 50 minutes (points per 100 possessions):
Image

1) All of them have the big 3, so all we can compare is the pg and center options.
2) Chalmers + Anthony wins easily.

Seems like a good choice to go with them this year. That's why it's so disappointing to see that unit's numbers this 2nd half of the season. (Their season-long numbers aren't bad, but I'd still call them disappointing considering the names involved, and considering that this is the Heat's go-to unit.)
User avatar
Wannabe MEP
Analyst
Posts: 3,157
And1: 1,853
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Idaho
 

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#139 » by Wannabe MEP » Fri Apr 6, 2012 7:02 pm

Ok, check out this one. Ranked by points per 100 possessions, minimum 30 minutes, from 20 games into this season until now. (The reason I did that is because I believe some of the Heat's early-season success was shock-and-awe on unprepared defenses + fast-breaking because opposing offenses sucked early season without pre-season. I believe the more recent trends are more what we're going to be seeing for the rest of the season and into the playoffs.)

Image

Top 3 have exactly one of LeBron/Wade:

1) Cole-Wade-Miller-Bosh-Haslem
2) Cole-Miller-Battier-LeBron-Haslem
3) Chalmers-Battier-LeBron-Haslem-Anthony

And 3 of top-5 are non-traditional with LeBron (Battier?) playing small-ball 4 (ergo extra spacing with only one big in the paint):

2) Cole-Miller-Battier-LeBron-Haslem
4) Chalmers-Wade-Battier-LeBron-Anthony
5) Chalmers-Wade-Battier-LeBron-Bosh
User avatar
mopper8
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,618
And1: 4,870
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: Petting elephants with the coolest dude alive

Re: The Conundrum that is LeBron James 

Post#140 » by mopper8 » Fri Apr 6, 2012 7:06 pm

The reason I did that is because I believe some of the Heat's early-season success was shock-and-awe on unprepared defenses + fast-breaking because opposing offenses sucked early season without pre-season. I believe the more recent trends are more what we're going to be seeing for the rest of the season and into the playoffs.)


I would dispute this. If you look at the numbers, Heat have tailed off not only in fg%, 3p%, rebs, pace, but also (and this is important) ft% as well. That doesn't point to defenses adjusting or playing injury-riddled teams early, that points to the Heat fatiguing as the season wears on.

Increased rest between games and series in the playoffs will benefit Miami, and I'd expect to see a team more like what you saw early on than what you see in March
DragicTime85 wrote:[Ric Bucher] has a tiny wiener and I can prove it.

Return to Statistical Analysis