theSkinny wrote:Yea, and all those REAL scouts who are saying the same things about him.
But hey, you have the word scout in your user name so obviously you are legit.
Thanks man
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
theSkinny wrote:Yea, and all those REAL scouts who are saying the same things about him.
But hey, you have the word scout in your user name so obviously you are legit.



luisnani wrote:Saying his only skill is scoring? That's pretty funny. Even if he doesn't pan out (I'm not sure he will), his ball-handling and court vision are already at similar level if not better than any of our starting players on the wings.
fredericklove wrote:luisnani wrote:Saying his only skill is scoring? That's pretty funny. Even if he doesn't pan out (I'm not sure he will), his ball-handling and court vision are already at similar level if not better than any of our starting players on the wings.
Well...alot of team's wings' ball-handling and/or court vision are already better than any of our wing starters, so its no accomplishment if PJ3 is better at those two things than our ...lol our guys.
luisnani wrote:fredericklove wrote:luisnani wrote:Saying his only skill is scoring? That's pretty funny. Even if he doesn't pan out (I'm not sure he will), his ball-handling and court vision are already at similar level if not better than any of our starting players on the wings.
Well...alot of team's wings' ball-handling and/or court vision are already better than any of our wing starters, so its no accomplishment if PJ3 is better at those two things than our ...lol our guys.
True but it's surprised even me how many people aren't keen on a prospect like Lamb because we already have DeMar. That's the kind of thinking that will keep this team on the treadmill.
Scouts were raving about Jones' play-making and ball-handling in a practice they had some time last year.
luisnani wrote:fredericklove wrote:luisnani wrote:Saying his only skill is scoring? That's pretty funny. Even if he doesn't pan out (I'm not sure he will), his ball-handling and court vision are already at similar level if not better than any of our starting players on the wings.
Well...alot of team's wings' ball-handling and/or court vision are already better than any of our wing starters, so its no accomplishment if PJ3 is better at those two things than our ...lol our guys.
True but it's surprised even me how many people aren't keen on a prospect like Lamb because we already have DeMar. That's the kind of thinking that will keep this team on the treadmill.
Scouts were raving about Jones' play-making and ball-handling in a practice they had some time last year.
kingz32 wrote:
Lamb is skinny as dog poop, doesnt have an NBA ready body, he will get eaten alive playing defense. He has a great jump shot and compliments Demar well in the sense that he can actually shoot. However, he is not a very good penetrator and would rather shoot the mid-range jumpshot than look for contact in the lane. This is the same knock on Barnes, and this shouldnt be the case for Barnes because he really does have a strong muscular body. I dont want a situation where we have two guards who arent big enough to guard the leagues top talent while one of them is only good at driving while the other one is only good at shooting jump shots. We need a penetrating guard who can keep the defenses honest and when covered kick it out to Bargnani in the corner or a 3point shooting wing. This penetrating guard is Lillard.

luisnani wrote:Just a little confused here, what is vertical quickness up and down the floor? Aren't the two perpendicular directions? or do you mean like forward sprinting?
fredericklove wrote:kingz32 wrote:
Lamb is skinny as dog poop, doesnt have an NBA ready body, he will get eaten alive playing defense. He has a great jump shot and compliments Demar well in the sense that he can actually shoot. However, he is not a very good penetrator and would rather shoot the mid-range jumpshot than look for contact in the lane. This is the same knock on Barnes, and this shouldnt be the case for Barnes because he really does have a strong muscular body. I dont want a situation where we have two guards who arent big enough to guard the leagues top talent while one of them is only good at driving while the other one is only good at shooting jump shots. We need a penetrating guard who can keep the defenses honest and when covered kick it out to Bargnani in the corner or a 3point shooting wing. This penetrating guard is Lillard.
Skinny but it doesn't mean he won't get stronger, he doesn't depend his game on strength, that shouldn't be a huge concern in the nba. He's not a good penetrator but he can handle the ball really well, he's a guy you can put the ball in his hand and not afraid he'll fumble the ball. So far we don't have anyone that can handle the ball at the wing. Lamb isn't strong enough yet but to say he isn't big enough...he's 6'5 at SG, that's the average NBA height, don't forget he has 6''11-7 wingspan to back his size up.
We can find a penetrating guard in the free agency, even if we don't find one, if Lamb drops to 8th, idk think anyone would think of passing him for the guy who has questionable game attitude and tweener style type of unmotivated wing, or an unknown prospect who's got college veteran numbers that never faced even one elite competition.
kingz32 wrote:fredericklove wrote:kingz32 wrote:
Lamb is skinny as dog poop, doesnt have an NBA ready body, he will get eaten alive playing defense. He has a great jump shot and compliments Demar well in the sense that he can actually shoot. However, he is not a very good penetrator and would rather shoot the mid-range jumpshot than look for contact in the lane. This is the same knock on Barnes, and this shouldnt be the case for Barnes because he really does have a strong muscular body. I dont want a situation where we have two guards who arent big enough to guard the leagues top talent while one of them is only good at driving while the other one is only good at shooting jump shots. We need a penetrating guard who can keep the defenses honest and when covered kick it out to Bargnani in the corner or a 3point shooting wing. This penetrating guard is Lillard.
Skinny but it doesn't mean he won't get stronger, he doesn't depend his game on strength, that shouldn't be a huge concern in the nba. He's not a good penetrator but he can handle the ball really well, he's a guy you can put the ball in his hand and not afraid he'll fumble the ball. So far we don't have anyone that can handle the ball at the wing. Lamb isn't strong enough yet but to say he isn't big enough...he's 6'5 at SG, that's the average NBA height, don't forget he has 6''11-7 wingspan to back his size up.
We can find a penetrating guard in the free agency, even if we don't find one, if Lamb drops to 8th, idk think anyone would think of passing him for the guy who has questionable game attitude and tweener style type of unmotivated wing, or an unknown prospect who's got college veteran numbers that never faced even one elite competition.
I respectfully disagree and think that Golden State will draft Lamb to replace Ellis at SG leaving Lillard as the inevitable pick for us at #8 assuming the order stays the same with GS ahead of Toronto.
theSkinny wrote:No prob man, keep believing what you want.. Just realize accusing everyone else of being wrong when you are just being a blatant homer is not the best way to get your point across.


fredericklove wrote:
So having lamb will keep this team on treadmill? And having PJ3 will not? Yeah in practice, but what about in an actual game? I've seen none of it when he's on the floor.
luisnani wrote:fredericklove wrote:
So having lamb will keep this team on treadmill? And having PJ3 will not? Yeah in practice, but what about in an actual game? I've seen none of it when he's on the floor.
I think you misunderstood me. Lamb is my favorite prospect in this draft outside of the Brow. People have said we shouldn't take Lamb because he wouldn't be given playing time alongside DeMar, and THAT is the kind of thinking that would keep this team on the treadmill (trying to draft on a needs basis when we don't have enough talent).
fredericklove wrote:
Kay, my bad. I read it wrong. Needs are definitely not going to do us any good for sure. And it seems like BC emphasizes alot on drafting a SF cos we lack talent in that area...I hope we don't go on needs like you said, especially at our range where he'll look at PJ3...a guy who thinks he can play the SF
kingz32 wrote:fredericklove wrote:kingz32 wrote:
Lamb is skinny as dog poop, doesnt have an NBA ready body, he will get eaten alive playing defense. He has a great jump shot and compliments Demar well in the sense that he can actually shoot. However, he is not a very good penetrator and would rather shoot the mid-range jumpshot than look for contact in the lane. This is the same knock on Barnes, and this shouldnt be the case for Barnes because he really does have a strong muscular body. I dont want a situation where we have two guards who arent big enough to guard the leagues top talent while one of them is only good at driving while the other one is only good at shooting jump shots. We need a penetrating guard who can keep the defenses honest and when covered kick it out to Bargnani in the corner or a 3point shooting wing. This penetrating guard is Lillard.
Skinny but it doesn't mean he won't get stronger, he doesn't depend his game on strength, that shouldn't be a huge concern in the nba. He's not a good penetrator but he can handle the ball really well, he's a guy you can put the ball in his hand and not afraid he'll fumble the ball. So far we don't have anyone that can handle the ball at the wing. Lamb isn't strong enough yet but to say he isn't big enough...he's 6'5 at SG, that's the average NBA height, don't forget he has 6''11-7 wingspan to back his size up.
We can find a penetrating guard in the free agency, even if we don't find one, if Lamb drops to 8th, idk think anyone would think of passing him for the guy who has questionable game attitude and tweener style type of unmotivated wing, or an unknown prospect who's got college veteran numbers that never faced even one elite competition.
I respectfully disagree and think that Golden State will draft Lamb to replace Ellis at SG leaving Lillard as the inevitable pick for us at #8 assuming the order stays the same with GS ahead of Toronto.