I really liked the Nene trade. I don't like this one.
First, the positives. Okafor seems to be a really smart guy -- he was an Academic All American, and graduated with a degree in finance from UConn after three years. There aren't questions about his work ethic or demeanor. I've always liked him, and want to see him succeed. I think he could be a decent front office person or coach.
Okafor has steadily improved his jumpshot:
2011-2012: 66% of his attempts were jumpshots, he shot 43.3%.
2010-2011: 32% of his attempts were jumpshots, he shot 39.8%.
2009-2010: 30% of his attempts were jumpshots, he shot 33.5%
http://www.82games.com/1112/11NOH21.HTMUnfortunately, almost all of that improvement came from between 3-9 feet, where Okafor shot >50% on 2.7fga/g. Not sure how much that helps with spacing. There is at least a chance that Okafor's later career will parallel Kurt Thomas.
http://www.hoopdata.com/player.aspx?name=Emeka%20Okaforhttp://bkref.com/tiny/dGZykOkafor and Nene can commiserate about their back problems. The CIA's brain transfer program may be able to experiment with Okafor and Blatche.
Ariza had a couple of good playoff series with Los Angeles.
Now, the bad. I wouldn't really want these guys on the roster if they used no cap room -- if they were 0$.
The biggest positive of the Nene trade was the impact it had on team culture and chemistry. It got rid of some of the players who may have been good guys but didn't maintain requisite levels of professionalism. We brought in Nene, who was very well suited to mentor our young bigs and complement our young guards.
I don't see how this trade does anything but hurt chemistry. I realize that I'm reaching, empathizing too much with players who are generationally alien to me. But I would be pissed were I Nene, I would be pissed were I Vesely, I would be pissed were I either of the Singletons, I would be pissed were I Seraphin, and I would be confused were I John Wall.
All of the bigs have to be irritated that we just committed a fair amount of money to a guy who duplicates without improving our current abilities. We lack scoring in the front court, and we brought in a guy who doesn't score with volume or remarkable efficiency. Okafor is a garbage man. His rebounding is decent, but we were not a bad rebounding team post trade.
Wall has to be confused. He must realize that we need shooters, and we just committed to a wing and a big with no shot. Spacing is going to be comical this year. At least Wall should get some good picks -- he'll be able to get by his man regularly, but will run into three guys in the paint, cheating off their marks.
The only way this makes sense is if the plan is really to flip one of Okafor or Nene. We should be able to get decent value for either, but flipping guys who are the most mature "leaders" on the team doesn't seem good for chemistry.
Oh well. I admit to harboring a fondness for Dale and Antonio Davis, for Oakley and Anthony Mason. I wish that rosters like that could work in the modern NBA. But I don't think they can, in the era of flopping, no-hand checking, stretch fours, and defensive specialists at the 5. If we were really committed to trying out a throwback strategy, I'd be secretly (and shamefully) tickled at the thought of a "tough" Wizards team. But we're obviously not actually committed to any long term strategy, and a bruising frontline certainly doesn't complement Wall.
In summary: meh.