ImageImageImageImageImage

2012 NBA Draft - Part V

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1401 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:36 pm

truwizfan4evr wrote:I really cant see the bobcats taking Beal at number 2 pick. I think Beal will still be there at three i expect a shocker from Ernie. With the third pick of the nba draft the Washington wizard selects ..........Harrison Barnes :x



I would jump off a bridge if that happens. At this point I think Beal has to be the pick. I wouldn't be mad with MKG but we need shooters bad.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1402 » by Illuminaire » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:28 pm

I'm happy with either MKG or Beal + Crowder.

If we take Harrison Barnes, I think part of me may die a little inside.
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1403 » by Severn Hoos » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:38 pm

I still have Beal at the top of my list, barely ahead of MKG. Would be very happy with either one.

Here's where I hope some of Ernie's hamfisted attenpts at misdirection come in. Because everyone knows/expects that it's Beal or Bust for us, the presumption is that Charlotte could just trade back to #4 and still get their man (let's assume it's TRob), knowing we won't take him.

So right on cue, there are "leaks" of trade discussions for the 6th & 11th picks. What does that mean? Well, that if Charlotte trades down to #4 and Beal is gone before we pick, there's no guarantee we stay at #3 anyway - and they could lose out on the one guy they really wanted. Likewise, the earlier "leaks" that MKG is at the top of our draft board seem to be a clumsy attempt to throw other teams off the scent.

In the end, I think the Bobs stay at #2 and take the one guy that they want - and I think it'll be Robinson. Then, the Wiz take Beal, Cavs take Barnes (crazy, I know), and Kings have to make a call on Drummond vs. MKG. And at that point, I'd offer just about anything outside of Wall to try and snag that pick.... 8-)
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,335
And1: 7,439
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1404 » by FAH1223 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:40 pm

Dat2U wrote:A draft night of Harrison Barnes and Tony Wroten would be worse nightmare.

A draft night of MKG and Jae Crowder would be my sweetest dream.

A draft night of Beal and some other dope will leave me feeling somewhere in between.


E-Mail Ted.
Image
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1405 » by rockymac52 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:43 pm

I'm Beal or bust. Or Anthony Davis ;)

But seriously, even though I buy into some of the hype surrounding the likes of MKG and Robinson, they simply DO NOT fit on this team.

Robinson would only make even the slightest bit of sense if we pull off another BIG trade that sends away 2 of our 5 big men (not including Blatche as one of our big men, but that might be hopeful thinking) and acquires some good wings in return. I don't see that happening. Maybe we trade one big for one wing, but we'd still have 4 (plus Blatche) decent big men, and no need to draft a big like TRob.

MKG... I'm really not in love with him in general, but my main concern is simple... HE CANNOT SHOOT. We have enough issues with shooting the ball. It's one thing to hope that our point guard eventually develops an adequate jumper, we can't afford to cross our fingers and hope for the best on a second player. And enough of the whole "he brings leadership" argument. We just added two more veterans. Ariza might not be a real "leader", but I think Okafor is. Nene definitely is. We have our leaders. We don't need to add a rookie who thinks he's a leader but can't even shoot a jump shot.

If we end up with MKG, we're going to be brutal to watch on offense night in and night out. Absolutely brutal. Great on defense though, to be fair. Beal adds a lot to a team like ours. He's the near perfect fit, all things considered.
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,611
And1: 576
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1406 » by Jay81 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:48 pm

here is the actual quote

Trevor Ariza was playing a pickup game with John Wall when he learned about his trade to the Wizards, and he said that Wall's jump shot "is looking really, really, really good, for those who haven’t seen him lately."
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1407 » by rockymac52 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:53 pm

I'd love to get encouraged by that, but it just honestly doesn't mean anything and it's not credible. I hope it's true. But I won't believe it until I see it. Not necessarily doubting that it's true or that it could be true by the end of the summer, I'm just saying you shouldn't read into that quote too much.
User avatar
Knighthonor
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,865
And1: 98
Joined: Feb 15, 2012

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1408 » by Knighthonor » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:25 pm

Dat2U wrote:A draft night of Harrison Barnes and Tony Wroten would be worse nightmare.

A draft night of MKG and Jae Crowder would be my sweetest dream.

A draft night of Beal and some other dope will leave me feeling somewhere in between.

I believe you are blindly hyped for MKG. he doesnt add much to the Wizards especially after this trade.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,823
And1: 7,955
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1409 » by montestewart » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:31 pm

DCZards wrote:Dat, I'd be happy with MKG on draft night...tho I prefer Beal. But if it is MKG no way I want Crowder with the second pick. We'd have two more mediocre shooters on a team that desperately needs perimeter scoring. I'd want a Doron Lamb with that second pick if he's available. I'd even take Hollis Thompson before I drafted Crowder.

Crowder is a smart, hard-working defender and a decent long-range shooter. But his overall shooting and offensive game is sorely lacking, imo

I've never seen Crowder play. Maybe there's something you see that needs to be seen to be understood, but looking at his stats (2P%, 3P%, FT%, FG/G, 3FG/G, FT/G) I don't see how he's lumped in with MKG. Crowder's shooting stats look more on par with Beal's shooting stats. I can understand why you wouldn't want Crowder for a SF after picking MKG, because there would be quite a crowd fighting for minutes there (and really everywhere in the frontcourt).
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1410 » by 7-Day Dray » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:44 pm

I still think Drummond is the guy we need to get. He has the most potential to become a superstar in this draft aside from Davis, and our roster lacks so much potential. If he develops, he can single-handedly change the course of this franchise. His physical tools are unreal -- 6'11.75" tall, 7'6.25 wingspan, 280 lbs w/ great lower body strength, had a 10.83 on the lane agility (reminiscent of a guard), and can jump out the gym.

We need to shoot big in this draft. I don't want to get another solid piece that can help us become Milwaukee Bucks 2.0., we need a franchise cornerstone, especially after the recent moves that have hamstrung our flexibility for the next few years. Getting Okafor shouldn't stop us from getting Drummond (if he Ernie's guy). If Drummond stayed in school until his junior year like T-Rob, I'm pretty sure he'd be the consensus #1 pick.
User avatar
Terpman
Pro Prospect
Posts: 831
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Location: Southern MD
         

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1411 » by Terpman » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:46 pm

Drummond shoots free throws like Helen Keller. No freakin thanks.
We are the Washington BULLETS!
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,335
And1: 7,439
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1412 » by FAH1223 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:32 am

7-Day Dray wrote:I still think Drummond is the guy we need to get. He has the most potential to become a superstar in this draft aside from Davis, and our roster lacks so much potential. If he develops, he can single-handedly change the course of this franchise. His physical tools are unreal -- 6'11.75" tall, 7'6.25 wingspan, 280 lbs w/ great lower body strength, had a 10.83 on the lane agility (reminiscent of a guard), and can jump out the gym.

We need to shoot big in this draft. I don't want to get another solid piece that can help us become Milwaukee Bucks 2.0., we need a franchise cornerstone, especially after the recent moves that have hamstrung our flexibility for the next few years. Getting Okafor shouldn't stop us from getting Drummond (if he Ernie's guy). If Drummond stayed in school until his junior year like T-Rob, I'm pretty sure he'd be the consensus #1 pick.


too bad Drummond has no post moves to speak up and just plays face up...
Image
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1413 » by 7-Day Dray » Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:48 am

FAH1223 wrote:
7-Day Dray wrote:I still think Drummond is the guy we need to get. He has the most potential to become a superstar in this draft aside from Davis, and our roster lacks so much potential. If he develops, he can single-handedly change the course of this franchise. His physical tools are unreal -- 6'11.75" tall, 7'6.25 wingspan, 280 lbs w/ great lower body strength, had a 10.83 on the lane agility (reminiscent of a guard), and can jump out the gym.

We need to shoot big in this draft. I don't want to get another solid piece that can help us become Milwaukee Bucks 2.0., we need a franchise cornerstone, especially after the recent moves that have hamstrung our flexibility for the next few years. Getting Okafor shouldn't stop us from getting Drummond (if he Ernie's guy). If Drummond stayed in school until his junior year like T-Rob, I'm pretty sure he'd be the consensus #1 pick.


too bad Drummond has no post moves to speak up and just plays face up...


I'm not an advocate of using Youtube videos to scout players, but in his HS mixtapes, he looks extremely coordinated w/ the ball for someone his age, showing a lot of finesse. He has the potential to add moves to his arsenal.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,335
And1: 7,439
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1414 » by FAH1223 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:14 am

im not comfortable drafting him unless I had an all-time great ala Kareem or Hakeem or Ewing, etc teaching him a thing or two. The Lakers did it right with Bynum, I doubt we could do that.
Image
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,636
And1: 4,527
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1415 » by closg00 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:33 am

FAH1223 wrote:im not comfortable drafting him unless I had an all-time great ala Kareem or Hakeem or Ewing, etc teaching him a thing or two. The Lakers did it right with Bynum, I doubt we could do that.


You beat me to-it, that is exactly what I was going to write. Wherever Drummond goes, it will be to an org that will take their time and develop him properly. Drummond probably needs a dedicated coach to work with him full-time.
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1416 » by truwizfan4evr » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:42 am

No drummond for us! Rather have MKG,Thomas Robinson Or Brad Beal. I wish there away we can still draft Thomas Robinson and then trade Booker for another first round pick. Then we can draft a shooter with the pick and a shooter or back up point guard with the thirty second pick.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1417 » by truwizfan4evr » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:11 am

Here's a profile video of Brad Beal http://www.nba.com/video/channels/draft ... rofile.nba
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,158
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1418 » by DCZards » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:31 am

montestewart wrote:
I've never seen Crowder play. Maybe there's something you see that needs to be seen to be understood, but looking at his stats (2P%, 3P%, FT%, FG/G, 3FG/G, FT/G) I don't see how he's lumped in with MKG. Crowder's shooting stats look more on par with Beal's shooting stats. I can understand why you wouldn't want Crowder for a SF after picking MKG, because there would be quite a crowd fighting for minutes there (and really everywhere in the frontcourt).


I saw Crowder play a lot at Marquette. He was essentiallly a PF for them, getting a lot of his shots in close and on offensive rebounds. Thus his good FG%. Crowder is only 6'4 and won't get those easy inside baskets in the NBA. In fact, at that size, he'll probabaly have to learn to play SG at the next level.

Crowder is a good three point shooter but his midrange shot and ability to take people off the dribble is mediocre, imo.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,645
And1: 1,332
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1419 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:43 am

I'm becoming more intrigued by the trade down of #3 to Portland for the #6 & 11. If that deal is on the table, I think I would do it, especially if it doesn't involve the #32, although even then I would strongly consider it.

Moving to 6 could still very well give us one of our desired players (Beal, Barnes, MKG). If Drummond goes in the top 5, one of those players will be available at 6. My guess is MKG.

Then at 11 we can get Terrance Ross. And maybe still add someone at 32 like Doron Lamb.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,611
And1: 576
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#1420 » by Jay81 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:29 am

We're inviting mkg and rivers for another workout??

Return to Washington Wizards