rcklsscognition wrote:Cigamodnalro wrote:rcklsscognition wrote:Besides those of you who are just plain refusing to deal with the Nets, for the others, would you deal with them if they could get Orlando an expiring contract, Brooks, and Lopez for 10 mil a year?
Summer of 2013 would be a net gain of 5 million on our capspace and we'd have just 25 million invested into Meer, BBD, Lopez, and Brooks. We could hit FA hard and get a SF, PG/SG. Remember, Lopez would be a 18/8 guy.
Lopez can't rebound or defend, can't muscle with the elite bigs or doesn't care to, and was out all of last season with injury.
The end goal should be winning a championship. Lopez is not a championship calaber starting center. If we can't pull one championship caliber starter by trading the second best player in the league, then were doing something wrong.
I'm okay (but not happy) trading Dwight for an expiring contract, so long as that expiring contract is Andrew Bynum.
So you're Henny, two options on the table, only two.
1) Dwight for Bynum straight up.
2) Dwight for NJ returning Lopez at 10 million a year, 9 million savings over Bynum.
Is Bynum worth the extra 9 million? What can that 9 million buy in addition to our existing space next year?
Bynum is worth waaaaay more than 9 million more than Brooks. I'm starting to think a lot of you were in bed when the Laker games started out here on the West Coast.





















