Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#181 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:37 am

AmerigoCorleone wrote:
Jajwanda wrote:Yes he's going to lose money and endorsements and go to Dallas where Nowitzki might be there still. He's going to go to Atlanta where Chris Paul will miraculously step away from the Clipper franchise that he really likes.

Do you have any idea how much money Howard loses if he doesn't go to L.A. or Brooklyn. Do you even have a clue?


Agendas where anything can make sense.


Don't you have anything better to do then follow me around the forum and make snide remarks every time I post? You never contribute anything to any of these threads.

Get a life man.
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#182 » by Kobe System » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:39 am

Shaheen wrote:
Jajwanda wrote:Yes he's going to lose money and endorsements and go to Dallas where Nowitzki might be there still. He's going to go to Atlanta where Chris Paul will miraculously step away from the Clipper franchise that he really likes.

Do you have any idea how much money Howard loses if he doesn't go to L.A. or Brooklyn. Do you even have a clue?


Yes he's going to stay in LA with a 37 and 39 year old who will continue to get worse and not even one good young player to name.

See what I did there? You can make any scenario sound stupid.
You don't know that Chris Paul will stay in LA. And even if CP3 does stay there are other scenarios which would work. LA or Dallas can surround him with good young players to pair with Dwight/Smith.

What if Dallas offered to make a Bynum/Howard combo and then put Dirk at SF?

Theres endless possibilities. To act like Dwight joining a sinking ship that will be the Lakers in two years is a sure thing is a joke. Good luck with that.


I wonder who's that 37 year old player you are referring to. Lol.

You think Lakers is a sinking ship? Lol. Stop it dude. We'll form a new dynasty right before Nets win a title. And you know that's a FACT. :lol:

By the way, thanks for the laughs.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#183 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:44 am

Kobe System wrote:I wonder who's that 37 year old player you are referring to. Lol.

You think Lakers is a sinking ship? Lol. Stop it dude. We'll form a new dynasty right before Nets win a title. And you know that's a FACT. :lol:

By the way, thanks for the laughs.


Wrong on Kobes age. But 34 is still to old to get it done.

You will form a new dynasty based on what? Your sense of entitlement is revolting. The Lakers don't always have to be good. The 1990s existed. And the Lakers won a grand total of 0 championships for that entire decade.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#184 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:47 am

U-Borat wrote:
hey about as many titles as the nets have won...ever


Actually we won 2 with Erving but nice try. That also has nothing to do with the fact that the Lakers have not always been good.
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#185 » by Kobe System » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:48 am

Shaheen wrote:
Kobe System wrote:I wonder who's that 37 year old player you are referring to. Lol.

You think Lakers is a sinking ship? Lol. Stop it dude. We'll form a new dynasty right before Nets win a title. And you know that's a FACT. :lol:

By the way, thanks for the laughs.


Wrong on Kobes age. But 34 is still to old to get it done.

You will form a new dynasty based on what? Your sense of entitlement is revolting. The Lakers don't always have to be good. The 1990s existed. And the Lakers won a grand total of 0 championships for that entire decade.


Here, get to know Kobe more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_Bryant :wink:

You wanna know how we will form a dynasty? Haven't you heard the Shaq signing? The Pau trade? The Chirs Paul vetoed trade? And oh, we got Nash for late picks. What made you think we'll stop doing this things?

More laughs, please. :lol:
LaLa
Banned User
Posts: 4,143
And1: 202
Joined: Mar 09, 2011
Location: ball

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#186 » by LaLa » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:49 am

Meh just ignore this troll, after his post on how Pau is a glorified Humphries he lost all credibility.

With that being said, although I would love to see him as a Laker, him on that NJ team would be a sight to see. With a new arena and that team, wow.
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#187 » by Kobe System » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:51 am

Shaheen wrote:
U-Borat wrote:
hey about as many titles as the nets have won...ever


Actually we won 2 with Erving but nice try. That also has nothing to do with the fact that the Lakers have not always been good.


You wanna talk about Lakers not winning anything in 90s (but staying VERY relevant) and then the last championship you got was with Erving? Lol. :lol:
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#188 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:52 am

Kobe System wrote:
Here, get to know Kobe more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_Bryant :wink:

You wanna know how we will form a dynasty? Haven't you heard the Shaq signing? The Pau trade? The Chirs Paul vetoed trade? And oh, we got Nash for late picks. What made you think we'll stop doing this things?

More laughs, please. :lol:


Ok and again haven't you heard of the 1990s? The Lakers do not always have to be good. And for an entire decade they stopped doing "things."
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#189 » by Kobe System » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:52 am

LaLa wrote:Meh just ignore this troll, after his post on how Pau is a glorified Humphries he lost all credibility.

With that being said, although I would love to see him as a Laker, him on that NJ team would be a sight to see. With a new arena and that team, wow.


It's all good, bro. I'm just playing with him. :rofl:
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#190 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:54 am

LaLa wrote:Meh just ignore this troll, after his post on how Pau is a glorified Humphries he lost all credibility.

With that being said, although I would love to see him as a Laker, him on that NJ team would be a sight to see. With a new arena and that team, wow.


Gasol put up similar numbers to Humphries last season. Learn to face facts.

Not saying they are the same player I'm just saying thats how productive Pau was last season.
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#191 » by Kobe System » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:54 am

Shaheen wrote:
Kobe System wrote:
Here, get to know Kobe more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_Bryant :wink:

You wanna know how we will form a dynasty? Haven't you heard the Shaq signing? The Pau trade? The Chirs Paul vetoed trade? And oh, we got Nash for late picks. What made you think we'll stop doing this things?

More laughs, please. :lol:


Ok and again haven't you heard of the 1990s? The Lakers do not always have to be good. And for an entire decade they stopped doing "things."


Welcome to the new era. Check your calendar. It's already 2012! You think Lakers will doing what they do because "they did nothing in the 90's"?

More laughs, please! :lol:
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#192 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:55 am

Anyone who disagrees with Lakers fans in your mind is a troll. This isn't the Lakers forum. I am allowed to have an opinion.
AmerigoCorleone
Banned User
Posts: 304
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 06, 2012
Location: Heaven

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#193 » by AmerigoCorleone » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:55 am

Shaheen wrote:Don't you have anything better to do then follow me around the forum and make snide remarks every time I post? You never contribute anything to any of these threads.

Get a life man.


It isn't that I'm following you around. You just happen to post too much.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#194 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:56 am

Kobe System wrote:
Welcome to the new era. Check your calendar. It's already 2012! You think Lakers will doing what they do because "they did nothing in the 90's"?

More laughs, please! :lol:


The only thing laughable is your perception that the Lakers have to be good all the time every year. Its just arrogant and its why most people do not like Lakers fans.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#195 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:57 am

AmerigoCorleone wrote:
Shaheen wrote:Don't you have anything better to do then follow me around the forum and make snide remarks every time I post? You never contribute anything to any of these threads.

Get a life man.


It isn't that I'm following you around. You just happen to post too much.


Well then why do you only post comments referring to me in these threads? Its pathetic.
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#196 » by Kobe System » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:58 am

Shaheen wrote:
LaLa wrote:Meh just ignore this troll, after his post on how Pau is a glorified Humphries he lost all credibility.

With that being said, although I would love to see him as a Laker, him on that NJ team would be a sight to see. With a new arena and that team, wow.


Gasol put up similar numbers to Humphries last season. Learn to face facts.

Not saying they are the same player I'm just saying thats how productive Pau was last season.


So -- Kevin Love is already on LeBron/Durant level? He posted beastly numbers last season as well.

And by the way, how many double teams do Humpries got last season? How many coaches planned a strategy to stop him? :lol:
AmerigoCorleone
Banned User
Posts: 304
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 06, 2012
Location: Heaven

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#197 » by AmerigoCorleone » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:59 am

The Nets have never won a championship btw.

Shaheen wrote:Well then why do you only post comments referring to me in these threads? Its pathetic.


Stop being a baby.
LaLa
Banned User
Posts: 4,143
And1: 202
Joined: Mar 09, 2011
Location: ball

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#198 » by LaLa » Sat Jul 7, 2012 10:59 am

Shaheen wrote:
LaLa wrote:Meh just ignore this troll, after his post on how Pau is a glorified Humphries he lost all credibility.

With that being said, although I would love to see him as a Laker, him on that NJ team would be a sight to see. With a new arena and that team, wow.


Gasol put up similar numbers to Humphries last season. Learn to face facts.

Not saying they are the same player I'm just saying thats how productive Pau was last season.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: oh man make a new thread and conduct a poll...you'll get laughed out of these forums. Geez.
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#199 » by Kobe System » Sat Jul 7, 2012 11:02 am

Shaheen wrote:Anyone who disagrees with Lakers fans in your mind is a troll. This isn't the Lakers forum. I am allowed to have an opinion.


I feel you. Here comes the painful truth, bro. Your opinion :censored:! If I were you, I'll stop posting. To save yourself from embarrassment.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#200 » by Shaheen » Sat Jul 7, 2012 11:04 am

AmerigoCorleone wrote:The Nets have never won a championship btw.

Shaheen wrote:Well then why do you only post comments referring to me in these threads? Its pathetic.


Stop being a baby.


Or how about you hop off my ****?

Return to The General Board