Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Josephpaul
Banned User
Posts: 7,261
And1: 295
Joined: Jan 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#481 » by Josephpaul » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:33 pm

I wait for officially announcement but
Deron
JJ
Wallace?
??
Dwight = ECF appearance?
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 93,251
And1: 37,137
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#482 » by RIPskaterdude » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:33 pm

heatwillbeback wrote:why would Cleveland want Kris Humphries?

I thought that is what is going to the third team in order to try to get a first rounder


They have the Kings future lotto protected pick.
Image
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#483 » by MannyRam99 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:35 pm

hey Billy King :

Image

I dare you.
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#484 » by The Skyhook » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:36 pm

TheXFactor wrote:
Jordan45822 wrote:
Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
Word is in these ears Howard to Nets about done... Cleveland sounds like the 3rd team involved. Stay tuned.


Wow Howard to the Nets. Finally done, now the drama if finally over.

Congratulations to the Nets fans.

We don't even know is this guy is legit. I won't believe it until I see Woj and all the other big name guys break it.
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#485 » by Kobe System » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:38 pm

I surely hope this is true. We can all finally move on from this drama.
turtlesnjoi
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 514
Joined: Sep 26, 2009
       

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#486 » by turtlesnjoi » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:39 pm

Tommy Dee has no credibility, for what it's worth.
Gallo>brook
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#487 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:39 pm

Ken Berger ‏@KBergCBS
Nets "making progress" on finding a third team to take Kris Humphries in a scenario that would send Dwight Howard to Brooklyn, source says.
Josephpaul
Banned User
Posts: 7,261
And1: 295
Joined: Jan 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#488 » by Josephpaul » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:40 pm

CBS thats better .
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#489 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:40 pm

Ken Berger ‏@KBergCBS
One possible destination for Humphries is Cleveland, who would get the forward in a sign-and-trade arrangement, source says.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#490 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:42 pm

Ken Berger ‏@KBergCBS
Progress with Cleveland as third team first mentioned by @TommyDeeTKB. Deal far from agreed to, but progress being made, source says.
turtlesnjoi
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 514
Joined: Sep 26, 2009
       

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#491 » by turtlesnjoi » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:43 pm

Oh ok, now I get it.

Cleveland trying to stick it to LeBron by helping the Nets get Howard.

It all makes sense now.
Gallo>brook
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#492 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:44 pm

turtlesnjoi wrote:Oh ok, now I get it.

Cleveland trying to stick it to LeBron by helping the Nets get Howard.

It all makes sense now.


also Gilbert screwing the Lakers like he helped out with Paul deal
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#493 » by Showtime:Part2 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:48 pm

i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.
Warspite:

Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#494 » by The Skyhook » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:50 pm

Showtime:Part2 wrote:i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.

Try and make it harder for Lebron to win championships? :dontknow: I honestly don't at this point.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 93,251
And1: 37,137
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#495 » by RIPskaterdude » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:51 pm

What has Cleveland done this offseason that has made any sense so far anyways?
Image
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#496 » by The Skyhook » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:53 pm

One possible destination for Humphries is Cleveland, who would get the forward in a sign-and-trade arrangement, source says.


https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 0459523072
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#497 » by Showtime:Part2 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:54 pm

The Skyhook wrote:
Showtime:Part2 wrote:i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.

Try and make it harder for Lebron to win championships? :dontknow: I honestly don't at this point.


that also doesn't make sense to me. the purpose of running a team is to win, not to try and go the route of mutual destruction. lol, i guess if i had billions and was a bit "eccentric," my logic might be reversed.
Warspite:



Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant

To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#498 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:54 pm

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Without an extension with Lakers, Andrew Bynum has a short list of teams he will consider in 2013 free agency, league sources tell Y?
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#499 » by The Skyhook » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:55 pm

Bynum has shown no inclination to agree to an immediate extension if sent to Orlando as part of a Dwight Howard package, sources tell Y!
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#500 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:55 pm

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Bynum has shown no inclination to agree to an immediate extension if sent to Orlando as part of a Dwight Howard package, sources tell Y!


there is your answer Laker fans

Return to The General Board