Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Josephpaul
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,261
- And1: 295
- Joined: Jan 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I wait for officially announcement but
Deron
JJ
Wallace?
??
Dwight = ECF appearance?
Deron
JJ
Wallace?
??
Dwight = ECF appearance?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,251
- And1: 37,137
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
heatwillbeback wrote:why would Cleveland want Kris Humphries?
I thought that is what is going to the third team in order to try to get a first rounder
They have the Kings future lotto protected pick.

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
MannyRam99
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,321
- And1: 33
- Joined: Apr 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
hey Billy King :

I dare you.

I dare you.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
The Skyhook
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,432
- And1: 925
- Joined: Sep 16, 2008
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
TheXFactor wrote:Jordan45822 wrote:Tommy Dee @TommyDeeTKB
Word is in these ears Howard to Nets about done... Cleveland sounds like the 3rd team involved. Stay tuned.
Wow Howard to the Nets. Finally done, now the drama if finally over.
Congratulations to the Nets fans.
We don't even know is this guy is legit. I won't believe it until I see Woj and all the other big name guys break it.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Kobe System
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,243
- And1: 449
- Joined: Mar 31, 2010
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I surely hope this is true. We can all finally move on from this drama.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
turtlesnjoi
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,551
- And1: 514
- Joined: Sep 26, 2009
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Tommy Dee has no credibility, for what it's worth.
Gallo>brook
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Ken Berger @KBergCBS
Nets "making progress" on finding a third team to take Kris Humphries in a scenario that would send Dwight Howard to Brooklyn, source says.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Josephpaul
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,261
- And1: 295
- Joined: Jan 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
CBS thats better .
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Ken Berger @KBergCBS
One possible destination for Humphries is Cleveland, who would get the forward in a sign-and-trade arrangement, source says.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Ken Berger @KBergCBS
Progress with Cleveland as third team first mentioned by @TommyDeeTKB. Deal far from agreed to, but progress being made, source says.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
turtlesnjoi
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,551
- And1: 514
- Joined: Sep 26, 2009
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Oh ok, now I get it.
Cleveland trying to stick it to LeBron by helping the Nets get Howard.
It all makes sense now.
Cleveland trying to stick it to LeBron by helping the Nets get Howard.
It all makes sense now.
Gallo>brook
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
turtlesnjoi wrote:Oh ok, now I get it.
Cleveland trying to stick it to LeBron by helping the Nets get Howard.
It all makes sense now.
also Gilbert screwing the Lakers like he helped out with Paul deal
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Showtime:Part2
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,434
- And1: 514
- Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.
Warspite:
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
The Skyhook
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,432
- And1: 925
- Joined: Sep 16, 2008
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Showtime:Part2 wrote:i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.
Try and make it harder for Lebron to win championships?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,251
- And1: 37,137
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
What has Cleveland done this offseason that has made any sense so far anyways?

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
The Skyhook
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,432
- And1: 925
- Joined: Sep 16, 2008
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
One possible destination for Humphries is Cleveland, who would get the forward in a sign-and-trade arrangement, source says.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 0459523072
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Showtime:Part2
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,434
- And1: 514
- Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
The Skyhook wrote:Showtime:Part2 wrote:i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.
Try and make it harder for Lebron to win championships?I honestly don't at this point.
that also doesn't make sense to me. the purpose of running a team is to win, not to try and go the route of mutual destruction. lol, i guess if i had billions and was a bit "eccentric," my logic might be reversed.
Warspite:
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Without an extension with Lakers, Andrew Bynum has a short list of teams he will consider in 2013 free agency, league sources tell Y?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
The Skyhook
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,432
- And1: 925
- Joined: Sep 16, 2008
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Bynum has shown no inclination to agree to an immediate extension if sent to Orlando as part of a Dwight Howard package, sources tell Y!
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Bynum has shown no inclination to agree to an immediate extension if sent to Orlando as part of a Dwight Howard package, sources tell Y!
there is your answer Laker fans

