Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,851
And1: 32,300
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#741 » by Dr Aki » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:33 am

the whole "there's a bank in every city'? quote?
Image
TheXFactor
Banned User
Posts: 3,976
And1: 31
Joined: Apr 19, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#742 » by TheXFactor » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:33 am

I feel bad for Magic fans if this deal goes through.
User avatar
LakerLegend
RealGM
Posts: 13,473
And1: 7,755
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: SoCal

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#743 » by LakerLegend » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:35 am

I cant believe Bynum would give up his Bird Rights
Josephpaul
Banned User
Posts: 7,261
And1: 295
Joined: Jan 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#744 » by Josephpaul » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:36 am

The magic need remember they are not in rush...
Lakers still offer the most.. If cap relief is the issue than go with HOU
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#745 » by Jordan45822 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:37 am

Lakerfan17 wrote:I cant believe Bynum would give up his Bird Rights


Bynum doesn't want to play for Orlando like Howard doesn't want to play for LA.

Whats the big deal? I would still do the trade anyways if I were both teams, but I guess Orlando is scared.
User avatar
inquisitive
RealGM
Posts: 17,095
And1: 2,867
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#746 » by inquisitive » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:38 am

So the Nets are taking back Hedo's contract?
KARD "You n Me " Mnet Countdown
www.youtube.com/watch?v=77b3zg3OhgI
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,844
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#747 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:44 am

wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...

Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.

Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.

With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.

Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#748 » by Jordan45822 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:45 am

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Nets are finding traction beyond third-team involvement of Cleveland to find a landing spot for Kris Humphries, league sources tell Y!


Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Nets GM Billy King is flying to Vegas Monday morning to watch Deron Williams w/ Team USA. No Dwight Howard deal imminent, still work to do.
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,176
And1: 3,953
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#749 » by Trader_Joe » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:46 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:
wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...

Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.

Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.


With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.

Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.

:o
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
swag2011
Senior
Posts: 508
And1: 17
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#750 » by swag2011 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:47 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:
wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...

Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.

Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.

With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.

Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.



Uhh Bynum>>>>>Brooks which is why he would get paid more. And Brooks isn't exactly injury free himself. He played only what, 5 games this season lol? Brooks reportedly doesn't wanna go to Orlando either. Lose/Lose for Orlando it seems.
Josephpaul
Banned User
Posts: 7,261
And1: 295
Joined: Jan 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#751 » by Josephpaul » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:47 am

A 3rd team is necessary if they want to move hedo .
User avatar
ClayDavis
Head Coach
Posts: 6,720
And1: 104
Joined: Jan 23, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#752 » by ClayDavis » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:48 am

inquisitive wrote:So the Nets are taking back Hedo's contract?


maybe richardson as well
TheXFactor
Banned User
Posts: 3,976
And1: 31
Joined: Apr 19, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#753 » by TheXFactor » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:50 am

Adrian Wojnarowski‏
@WojYahooNBA

Nets GM Billy King is flying to Vegas Monday morning to watch Deron Williams w/ Team USA. No Dwight Howard deal imminent, still work to do.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,844
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#754 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:50 am

swag2011 wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...

Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.

Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.

With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.

Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.



Uhh Bynum>>>>>Brooks which is why he would get paid more. And Brooks isn't exactly injury free himself. He played only what, 5 games this season lol? Brooks reportedly doesn't wanna go to Orlando either. Lose/Lose for Orlando it seems.

Truthfully Bynum is currently one of the flatout most overrated players in the L and Brook one of the most underrated.

The gap that separates them is a lot smaller then people will ever admit, if Brook was a Laker people would be all on his nuts like some Gold Bond, his win shares and efficiency would be all pumped up and his defensive woes would be masked and covered for like Bynum's are.

Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#755 » by Shaheen » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:52 am

CB-Blazer wrote:
Why do the Lakers need anymore assets?

Andrew Bynum is hands down worth more than anything the Nets can offer.


I'm saying that I don't think Magic is using this as leverage to up the LA offer because there is not much else they can offer.
Day in the Life
Analyst
Posts: 3,667
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 19, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#756 » by Day in the Life » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:52 am

vincecarteer4pres is the ultimate Lopez homer. Give me a break

"Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close."
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#757 » by Shaheen » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:53 am

Magic Mamba wrote:

Thought it was past your bed time


You take your pills today?
Jameslm18
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#758 » by Jameslm18 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:55 am

Shaheen wrote:
Magic Mamba wrote:

Thought it was past your bed time


You take your pills today?


Image
Shaheen - the biggest nets homer on realgm
rhp1990 wrote:y'all need to just ignore shaheen. Dont feed the troll. He needs to realize if this many people are calling him a moron then maybe he is a moron/ignorant when it comes to ball.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,844
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#759 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:55 am

Day in the Life wrote:vincecarteer4pres is the ultimate Lopez homer. Give me a break

"Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close."

Great rebuttal.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Day in the Life
Analyst
Posts: 3,667
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 19, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#760 » by Day in the Life » Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:57 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:
Day in the Life wrote:vincecarteer4pres is the ultimate Lopez homer. Give me a break

"Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close."

Great rebuttal.


I'm doing you a favor and responding like how you usually respond to posts.

Return to The General Board