Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,851
- And1: 32,300
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
the whole "there's a bank in every city'? quote?

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
TheXFactor
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,976
- And1: 31
- Joined: Apr 19, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I feel bad for Magic fans if this deal goes through.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- LakerLegend
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,473
- And1: 7,755
- Joined: Jun 15, 2002
- Location: SoCal
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I cant believe Bynum would give up his Bird Rights
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Josephpaul
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,261
- And1: 295
- Joined: Jan 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
The magic need remember they are not in rush...
Lakers still offer the most.. If cap relief is the issue than go with HOU
Lakers still offer the most.. If cap relief is the issue than go with HOU
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Lakerfan17 wrote:I cant believe Bynum would give up his Bird Rights
Bynum doesn't want to play for Orlando like Howard doesn't want to play for LA.
Whats the big deal? I would still do the trade anyways if I were both teams, but I guess Orlando is scared.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- inquisitive
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,095
- And1: 2,867
- Joined: Aug 27, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
So the Nets are taking back Hedo's contract?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,070
- And1: 3,844
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...
Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.
Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.
With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.
Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jordan45822
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,564
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Nets are finding traction beyond third-team involvement of Cleveland to find a landing spot for Kris Humphries, league sources tell Y!
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Nets GM Billy King is flying to Vegas Monday morning to watch Deron Williams w/ Team USA. No Dwight Howard deal imminent, still work to do.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Trader_Joe
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 29,176
- And1: 3,953
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
vincecarter4pres wrote:wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...
Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.
Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.
With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.
Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
swag2011
- Senior
- Posts: 508
- And1: 17
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
vincecarter4pres wrote:wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...
Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.
Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.
With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.
Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.
Uhh Bynum>>>>>Brooks which is why he would get paid more. And Brooks isn't exactly injury free himself. He played only what, 5 games this season lol? Brooks reportedly doesn't wanna go to Orlando either. Lose/Lose for Orlando it seems.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Josephpaul
- Banned User
- Posts: 7,261
- And1: 295
- Joined: Jan 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
A 3rd team is necessary if they want to move hedo .
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- ClayDavis
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,720
- And1: 104
- Joined: Jan 23, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
inquisitive wrote:So the Nets are taking back Hedo's contract?
maybe richardson as well
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
TheXFactor
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,976
- And1: 31
- Joined: Apr 19, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Adrian Wojnarowski
@WojYahooNBA
Nets GM Billy King is flying to Vegas Monday morning to watch Deron Williams w/ Team USA. No Dwight Howard deal imminent, still work to do.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,070
- And1: 3,844
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
swag2011 wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:wilhelmthe1st wrote:Brook max contract vs Bynum max contract (he's not walking, lets me serious "there's a bank in every city", plus if he was on the Magic he would be THE MAN down there, no question, he wouldn't leave that) hmm...
Brooks max contract is like 4 years and 58 million.
Bynum's is 5 years 100 million.
With at least 5 knee surgeries and periodic Synvisc injections.
Oh and now he reportedly does not want to be there.
Uhh Bynum>>>>>Brooks which is why he would get paid more. And Brooks isn't exactly injury free himself. He played only what, 5 games this season lol? Brooks reportedly doesn't wanna go to Orlando either. Lose/Lose for Orlando it seems.
Truthfully Bynum is currently one of the flatout most overrated players in the L and Brook one of the most underrated.
The gap that separates them is a lot smaller then people will ever admit, if Brook was a Laker people would be all on his nuts like some Gold Bond, his win shares and efficiency would be all pumped up and his defensive woes would be masked and covered for like Bynum's are.
Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Shaheen
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,767
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
CB-Blazer wrote:
Why do the Lakers need anymore assets?
Andrew Bynum is hands down worth more than anything the Nets can offer.
I'm saying that I don't think Magic is using this as leverage to up the LA offer because there is not much else they can offer.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Day in the Life
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,667
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
vincecarteer4pres is the ultimate Lopez homer. Give me a break
"Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close."
"Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close."
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Shaheen
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,767
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Magic Mamba wrote:
Thought it was past your bed time
You take your pills today?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Jameslm18
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Shaheen wrote:Magic Mamba wrote:
Thought it was past your bed time
You take your pills today?

Shaheen - the biggest nets homer on realgm
rhp1990 wrote:y'all need to just ignore shaheen. Dont feed the troll. He needs to realize if this many people are calling him a moron then maybe he is a moron/ignorant when it comes to ball.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,070
- And1: 3,844
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Day in the Life wrote:vincecarteer4pres is the ultimate Lopez homer. Give me a break
"Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close."
Great rebuttal.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Day in the Life
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,667
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
vincecarter4pres wrote:Day in the Life wrote:vincecarteer4pres is the ultimate Lopez homer. Give me a break
"Bynum is a better rebounder that's for sure and it's not close. Everything else is very close."
Great rebuttal.
I'm doing you a favor and responding like how you usually respond to posts.





