LUKE23 wrote:You keep saying they have made awful moves but can't name any of them (that are real). When you name letting Vlad Rad go as a bad move, it's obvious we disagree on team philosophy and player value.
they traded a bunch of veterans who are still in the league for a bunch of guys who arent in the league. this isnt rocket science but im not surprised you dont get it
Landry had no place on their team as a vet contract.
he was a 2nd round pick they gave away. they could have had him on a rookie minimum contract as a bench player for 2-3 years but they whiffed on his talent.
Ibaka is younger and better. They traded for Perkins who is better. Landry is an undersized efficient 4 who can't defend. He's not a starter on good teams
again... your not even aware of the circumstances surrounding him. they could have had him as a cheap asset and backup the way we had mam for several years. instead they dumped him for a future 2nd.
Who is Roddy? Beaubois? He stinks. Bledsoe is solid but so is Maynor. Gibson isn't better than Ibaka
these are more examples of players they completely whiffed on. drafted them, or could have had them and traded them away for zero. these players proved to have value once they left.... but none that presti ever saw.
You're reaching and reaching badly, and I think you know it. But you've always refused to give OKC credit, while at the same time backing the Bucks modus operandi. It's odd and laughable.
im not reaching at all. it just seems that way because i disagree with your cult leader.
Ibaka is just a guy? He's averaging 15.5/7.3/4.0 @ .598 TS per 36 at age 23
yeah hes a decent nba big. nothing to get super excited about tho. similar numbers to sanders there.