LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS

Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Kupchak9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,802
And1: 2,492
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#1 » by Kupchak9 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:00 am

LAL out: Howard Duhon
LAL in: Love Marshon Humphries

Hometown kid Love

OKC out: TOR 1st Perkins Lamb Collison
OKC in: Lopez

They get a top 5 Center and low post presence


Minny out: Love
Minny in: Lamb Collison TOR 1st BRK 2014 1st

They can pay Pek and get an awesome pick.

Nets out: Lopez Humph Marshon 2014 1st
Nets in: Howard Perkins Duhon

They get what they've been asking for
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 85,511
And1: 88,346
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:20 pm

So Love's value is now a non-elite prospect and a mid-lotto pick? I agree his value has been cut with his injuries and his mouth hasnt done him any favors either but if this is all it cost, teams would be lining up to beat that offer and Minny has no interest in helping LA.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,676
And1: 916
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#3 » by jscott » Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:28 pm

I can't believe what you are sending back to MN for Kevin Love.

Please stop posting trades involving the Timberwolves. You have no idea what the value of these players have.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,542
And1: 1,423
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#4 » by ecuhus1981 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:38 pm

Was MIN supposed to get Perkins in this deal as well? He doesn't show up in MIN's incoming section, or anyone else's. Anyway, it's still not good for the Wolves. I can at least see the possibility of sending Lopez (++) to MIN, an them sending Love to the Lakers. But downgrading that Perkins hurts value-wise, and he is redundant to Pekovic.

Nets would accept, but I think this deal falls apart.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
User avatar
Mattya
RealGM
Posts: 16,586
And1: 6,282
Joined: Aug 08, 2008
   

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#5 » by Mattya » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:09 pm

:nonono:

1. Kevin Love's hometown is Lake Oswego, Oregon, not LA.

2. The Love trades have gotten worse each day.
User avatar
eliasrapp98
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 381
Joined: May 28, 2012
Location: Philly
       

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#6 » by eliasrapp98 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:57 pm

Terrible for MIN. Also where is Perkins going?
PG: Russell Westbrook, Reggie Jackson
SG: Andre Roberson, Anthony Morrow, Jeremy Lamb
SF: Kevin Durant, KJ McDaniels, Perry Jones
PF: Serge Ibaka, Nick Collison, Robert Covington
Cc: Al Jefferson, Steven Adams, Kendrick Perkins, Mitch McGary
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#7 » by [RCG] » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:00 pm

That is horrible return for Minnesota. Maybe if Lamb had actually played and played very well this year and Toronto and Brooklyn were in the running for a top-5 pick this year but none of that has played out so its an easy pass from the Wolves. Swap Collison for Ibaka and it becomes a lot closer.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,676
And1: 916
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#8 » by jscott » Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:20 pm

ecuhus1981 wrote:Was MIN supposed to get Perkins in this deal as well? He doesn't show up in MIN's incoming section, or anyone else's. Anyway, it's still not good for the Wolves. I can at least see the possibility of sending Lopez (++) to MIN, an them sending Love to the Lakers. But downgrading that Perkins hurts value-wise, and he is redundant to Pekovic.

Nets would accept, but I think this deal falls apart.

So Perkins is redundant with Pek but Lopez isn't? :roll:
Kupchak9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,802
And1: 2,492
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#9 » by Kupchak9 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:35 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:So Love's value is now a non-elite prospect and a mid-lotto pick? I agree his value has been cut with his injuries and his mouth hasnt done him any favors either but if this is all it cost, teams would be lining up to beat that offer and Minny has no interest in helping LA.


A #6 pick is mid lotto?
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 85,511
And1: 88,346
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#10 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:43 pm

Kupchak9 wrote:A #6 pick is mid lotto?


well its not high and its not low....
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,646
And1: 141
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#11 » by schaffy » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:44 pm

Kupchak9 wrote:
A #6 pick is mid lotto?


First off, the TOR pick is #7. And with 14 picks in the lottery, yes #7 is a mid lotto pick.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#12 » by [RCG] » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:15 pm

There are 14 lottery picks. Divide that by 3 to get early-mid-late. That is just less than 5 per so:

1-5 = early lottery picks
6-10 = mid lottery picks
11-14 = late lottery picks

Not that hard.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,438
And1: 2,013
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#13 » by Doormatt » Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:38 pm

isnt that essentially what harden got traded for (just replace martin with collison)), how is it horrible? and harden is far better than kevin love.
#doorgek
User avatar
Keith Van Horn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,893
And1: 1,174
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
   

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#14 » by Keith Van Horn » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:38 am

I don't think Minny is going to get a lot for Love. Other than being a stat stuffer, he hasn't done anything for his team in 4 years. And now he's going to get an injury prone stigma attached to him like Brook Lopez has.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#15 » by [RCG] » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:44 am

macgyver893 wrote:I don't think Minny is going to get a lot for Love. Other than being a stat stuffer, he hasn't done anything for his team in 4 years. And now he's going to get an injury prone stigma attached to him like Brook Lopez has.


Oh wait. How did Durant get so good? He stuffed the stat sheet and lost which resulted in Russell Westbrook. Surely he carried his team to the playoffs then. No? Oh he stuffed the stat sheet again and lost some more which resulted in James Harden. Now what do you know, he was surrounded by other talented players and won! Amazing how that works!

Sam Presti also added Serge Ibaka 24th as a late-first draft pick.
Kahn on the other hand gave Love Flynn, Rubio, Johnson and Williams.

Not to mention the respective health of both rosters.
Your post is completely lacking in context and accuracy.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 54,642
And1: 13,991
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#16 » by shrink » Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:45 pm

macgyver893 wrote:I don't think Minny is going to get a lot for Love. Other than being a stat stuffer, he hasn't done anything for his team in 4 years.


Is that because today's NBA is quickly moving away from statistics in player evaluation?

Or because today's NBA has so many superstars available of equal production that aren't locked away on a handful of the top free agent destinations?


I don't think MIN will consider trading Love until next year's trade deadline, but if they do, there are going to be a long line of teams that could use all his extra possessions and the way he spreads the floor.
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
User avatar
Figjamjr
Sophomore
Posts: 127
And1: 4
Joined: Nov 27, 2012

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#17 » by Figjamjr » Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:58 pm

Interesting Trade idea. I think if you swap out Collison for Ibaka then your closer. However, MN isn't that interested in 1st round picks. Despite all the injuries, they are still in Win Now mode. If you could send MN, Lamb, Ibaka, Jones III, and a #7 pick, then I think MN considers it. That would give MN a SG they need, a replacement PF for Love, Jones who may develop into Odem and a pick in case either Lamb or Jones dont develop.
User avatar
eliasrapp98
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 381
Joined: May 28, 2012
Location: Philly
       

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#18 » by eliasrapp98 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:49 pm

Kupchak9 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:So Love's value is now a non-elite prospect and a mid-lotto pick? I agree his value has been cut with his injuries and his mouth hasnt done him any favors either but if this is all it cost, teams would be lining up to beat that offer and Minny has no interest in helping LA.


A #6 pick is mid lotto?

It's at best #6 most likely #8 in a super weak draft. Just give up. It's an awful trade for MIN.
PG: Russell Westbrook, Reggie Jackson
SG: Andre Roberson, Anthony Morrow, Jeremy Lamb
SF: Kevin Durant, KJ McDaniels, Perry Jones
PF: Serge Ibaka, Nick Collison, Robert Covington
Cc: Al Jefferson, Steven Adams, Kendrick Perkins, Mitch McGary
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,447
And1: 2,007
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#19 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:08 pm

Doormatt wrote:isnt that essentially what harden got traded for (just replace martin with collison)), how is it horrible? and harden is far better than kevin love.

Well, that's debatable....Martin is also a much bigger piece then Collison... :lol:
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,438
And1: 2,013
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: LAL / OKC / MINNY / NETS 

Post#20 » by Doormatt » Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:25 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:
Doormatt wrote:isnt that essentially what harden got traded for (just replace martin with collison)), how is it horrible? and harden is far better than kevin love.

Well, that's debatable....Martin is also a much bigger piece then Collison... :lol:


well martin is good, but collison is extremely underrated. i dont think the gap between them is that big especially when you factor how cost efficient collison's contract is.
#doorgek

Return to Trades and Transactions