CBS: Deal on the table: LRMAM, 1st for Redick.

Post #341 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:59 am

GrendonJennings wrote:If I am correct at gauging that this is a proposed Ellis/Smiff straight up trade?

Mark me down with OK, for this reason.

Ellis I'd say is 75% likely to opt out next year.
Smiff is 98% likely to opt out next year (Milwaukee factor).

Ellis is 50% likely to decline Milwaukee giving him top dollar for a better situation.
Smiff is 90% likely to decline Milwaukee giving him top dollar for a better situation.

Saving Hammond from himself.

Luke will kill you for this but I'm in the same camp.

Baddy Chuck · Post #342 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:02 am

GrendonJennings wrote:If I am correct at gauging that this is a proposed Ellis/Smiff straight up trade?

Mark me down with OK, for this reason.

Ellis I'd say is 75% likely to opt out next year.
Smiff is 98% likely to opt out next year (Milwaukee factor).

Ellis is 50% likely to decline Milwaukee giving him top dollar for a better situation.
Smiff is 90% likely to decline Milwaukee giving him top dollar for a better situation.

Saving Hammond from himself.

I think like this too, but it will just lead to overpaying a different 3rd wheel type guy.

mlloyd10 · Post #343 » by **mlloyd10** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:24 am

Redick tonight 4-14 and 0-7 from 3

JayMKE · Post #344 » by **JayMKE** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:25 am

mlloyd10 wrote:Redick tonight 4-14 and 0-7 from 3

light it up light it up

mlloyd10 · Post #345 » by **mlloyd10** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:25 am

mcfromage wrote:Do this, it's okay if there's a pick involved somewhere...

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine/?tradeId=adq6vu7

How bout we keep Harris and Harkless goes to hawks

crkone · Post #346 » by **crkone** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:25 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
GrendonJennings wrote:If I am correct at gauging that this is a proposed Ellis/Smiff straight up trade?

Mark me down with OK, for this reason.

Ellis I'd say is 75% likely to opt out next year.
Smiff is 98% likely to opt out next year (Milwaukee factor).

Ellis is 50% likely to decline Milwaukee giving him top dollar for a better situation.
Smiff is 90% likely to decline Milwaukee giving him top dollar for a better situation.

Saving Hammond from himself.

I think like this too, but it will just lead to overpaying a different 3rd wheel type guy.

That's only if a 3rd wheel type wants to come here and how long the Bucks are waiting on Redick/Jennings /Smith. They might be too late if we're lucky.

blazza18 · Post #347 » by **blazza18** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:28 am

mlloyd10 wrote:Redick tonight 4-14 and 0-7 from 3

I wonder if this means anything. Or if its just an off night.

Rockmaninoff · Post #348 » by **Rockmaninoff** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:36 am

From what I look at, the upcoming draft is loaded with good NBA prospects, and because of the lack of standouts, the best player may be taken in the teens.

Don't trade the pick.

whatthe_buck!? · Post #349 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:16 am

Rockmaninoff wrote:From what I look at, the upcoming draft is loaded with good NBA prospects, and because of the lack of standouts, the best player may be taken in the teens.

Don't trade the pick.

WiscoKing13 · Post #350 » by **WiscoKing13** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:27 am

I doubt we did

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--nba-t ... nM-;_ylv=3

PkrsBcksGphsMqt · Post #351 » by **PkrsBcksGphsMqt** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:29 am

WiscoKing13 wrote:I doubt we did

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--nba-t ... nM-;_ylv=3

Yeah I was just going to post this quote from that article...

Indiana, Milwaukee, Chicago and Minnesota have expressed interest in trading for Redick, but teams have been reluctant to give up a first-round pick and a good young player for a player who could turn into a rental for the rest of the season.

Wiscfan92 · Post #352 » by **Wiscfan92** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:30 am

this is a terrible trade IMO. But I'm a big redick hater. I don't see how we would get roped into giving away our pick. If they have us theirs I'd do it. Or if we protect the pic and dump goooden

blazza18 · Post #353 » by **blazza18** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:31 am

Surely no team will be stupid enough to give up their first for him. (Even us)

WiscoKing13 · Post #354 » by **WiscoKing13** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:36 am

blazza18 wrote:Surely no team will be stupid enough to give up their first for him. (Even us)

he's easily worth a first, just not from the bucks POV.

salsa22 · Post #355 » by **salsa22** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:36 am

It's too bad Doron Lamb isn't ready to go. Otherwise we could just plug him into the SG spot, if Monta gets traded.

Hammond just needs to play hardball with Orlando and not give in to giving them a 1st rounder. I have no problem at all giving Orlando Mbah a Moute though.

Post #356 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:37 am

WiscoKing13 wrote:
blazza18 wrote:Surely no team will be stupid enough to give up their first for him. (Even us)

he's easily worth a first, just not from the bucks POV.

Absolutely.

Max Green · Post #357 » by **Max Green** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:41 am

Dalembert, 1st, Harris should be able to get us Eric Gordon. Or Luc,1st & or Udoh/Dalembert should be able to get us Jeremy Lamb from OKC.

milweskee · Post #358 » by **milweskee** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:42 am

DrugBust wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:
blazza18 wrote:Surely no team will be stupid enough to give up their first for him. (Even us)

he's easily worth a first, just not from the bucks POV.

Absolutely.

Yup. Reddick is an instant offense 6th man on a contender. He's worth a #25-30 pick in the draft.

Post #359 » by **paulpressey25** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:43 am

Too bad we can't load up a package like this (and add whatever else is needed) to go get Bledsoe.

That dude would be worth the gamble of giving up a ton of assets. And he's locked into a cheap contract for all of next year.

blazza18 · Post #360 » by **blazza18** » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:46 am

paulpressey25 wrote:Too bad we can't load up a package like this (and add whatever else is needed) to go get Bledsoe.

That dude would be worth the gamble of giving up a ton of assets. And he's locked into a cheap contract for all of next year.

Even Eric Gordon I'd be happy to gamble on with our 1st. He's still contracted for a few more years. For us giving Orlando our first for Redick is beyond stupid. He doesn't put us over the edge.