Garbs_7 wrote:Listening to the Podcast PP posted and I really enjoy listening to Ted Davis. I'm new to the Milwaukee media stuff but he seems really good and for a rebuild/
Ted Davis is the best thing associated with the entire Bucks organization.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Garbs_7 wrote:Listening to the Podcast PP posted and I really enjoy listening to Ted Davis. I'm new to the Milwaukee media stuff but he seems really good and for a rebuild/
paulpressey25 wrote:Scoops wrote:Yeah, Hammond sucks and should have been gone 2 years ago. Kohl sucks. This trade deadline has nothing to do with that though.
Sure it does. We just wasted another year when we could have gotten a plan started. Plans take a couple years. And every year we never start one.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.
Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.
whatthe_buck!? wrote:Garbs_7 wrote:Ted Davis is the best thing associated with the entire Bucks organization.
Rockmaninoff wrote:I'm thrilled they didn't give up the pick. It has much more inherent value. It's like the game show where you can either take the blender or pick what's behind the door. The pick is the dream. Harris is reality. Everyone is a dreamer.

ampd wrote:But instead we got the wrong half of that plan.

paulpressey25 wrote:Scoops wrote:Yeah, Hammond sucks and should have been gone 2 years ago. Kohl sucks. This trade deadline has nothing to do with that though.
Sure it does. We just wasted another year when we could have gotten a plan started. Plans take a couple years. And every year we never start one.
ampd wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Scoops wrote:Yeah, Hammond sucks and should have been gone 2 years ago. Kohl sucks. This trade deadline has nothing to do with that though.
Sure it does. We just wasted another year when we could have gotten a plan started. Plans take a couple years. And every year we never start one.
Thats the thing that bothers me. At least if it was Josh Smith the plan is clear. Assemble some good defenders who are athletic. Get a couple shooters. Pay him his money. I might not like the plan but at least it makes sense and has a non zero chance of making us a home court team if executed well.
But instead we got the wrong half of that plan.
ampd wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Scoops wrote:Yeah, Hammond sucks and should have been gone 2 years ago. Kohl sucks. This trade deadline has nothing to do with that though.
Sure it does. We just wasted another year when we could have gotten a plan started. Plans take a couple years. And every year we never start one.
Thats the thing that bothers me. At least if it was Josh Smith the plan is clear. Assemble some good defenders who are athletic. Get a couple shooters. Pay him his money. I might not like the plan but at least it makes sense and has a non zero chance of making us a home court team if executed well.
But instead we got the wrong half of that plan.
LUKE23 wrote:May have already been posted.Milwaukee: C+
What are the Bucks doing? That's been the question everyone around the league has spent all week trying to figure out. Milwaukee was as active as anyone, and reportedly in discussions to trade for Josh Smith as part of a three-way trade until just before the deadline. Those talks broke down, but the Bucks still made the biggest splash of any team by acquiring Redick.
Despite Redick nominally being a rental -- he's in the last year of a contract -- it's somewhat unclear how much this trade will help Milwaukee the rest of the way. That will depend on how interim head coach Jim Boylan manages his revamped backcourt. The Bucks don't have a true backup for Brandon Jennings at the point after dealing Udrih, which presumably means Redick and Monta Ellis will share ballhandling duties as part of a three-guard rotation. If that's a win, it's not by much. The clearer upgrade comes when Redick takes Ellis' minutes, giving Milwaukee a more efficient option at shooting guard. Our Bradford Doolittle estimated that change adding about a win to the Bucks' bottom line.
The more interesting question is what Milwaukee does this summer. Assuming Ellis opts out of his contract, the Bucks have the option of using the amnesty provision to clear Drew Gooden's salary off the books and cut their cap figure to about $44 million. (Trading Ayon or turning down his player option saves nearly another million.) That means Milwaukee could offer Smith somewhere in the neighborhood of $15-17 million as a free agent, which might be the best offer he gets, while still re-signing Jennings and Redick.
The Bucks would have to skimp on filling out the roster to stay under the luxury-tax threshold, but a starting lineup of Jennings, Redick, Smith, Ersan Ilyasova and Larry Sanders is an intriguing mix. That might even be good enough to earn home-court advantage in the East. Of course, Smith might not really be interested in playing in Milwaukee, and giving up the promising Harris remains an expensive price for the right to pay Redick fair-market value this summer. So the Bucks don't grade out much better than if they had done nothing at all.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/ ... line-deals

Scoops wrote:So picking a direction you disagree with would have been better than waiting until the offseason to pick a direction?
paulpressey25 wrote:ampd wrote:But instead we got the wrong half of that plan.
We went ahead and bought the trailer before we learned our credit was revoked and we couldn't buy the boat to go on it.

paulpressey25 wrote:Scoops wrote:So picking a direction you disagree with would have been better than waiting until the offseason to pick a direction?
For me the answer would be yes. I want to just see one coherent philosophy implemented for a 2-3 year period. I don't care which one it is.
But today exposed two issues. Philosophy and Execution. We did actually try a philosophy but were too incompetent to execute it.
Scoops wrote:So picking a direction you disagree with would have been better than waiting until the offseason to pick a direction?

ampd wrote:Scoops wrote:So picking a direction you disagree with would have been better than waiting until the offseason to pick a direction?
It would be better than going into the off season and then once again not picking a direction.
Jez2983 wrote:Well, at least Harris may get a go.
Who the hell are Ayon and Smith?
Excellent trade. For the Magic.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
AussieBuck wrote:Jez2983 wrote:Well, at least Harris may get a go.
Who the hell are Ayon and Smith?
Excellent trade. For the Magic.
A couple of solid 3rd stringers. I can now add Orlando to my teams to watch regularly list.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.