GhostsOfGil wrote:I'm starting to warm up to the idea of drafting Noel. I think there is a very real possibility that the Cavs pass on him, especially with their unorthodox draft history.
I want nothing to do with Noel at all. By that I mean that, yes, we should take him if he's there at 3. A consensus 1st available at 3? I think we'd have to.
When 206 was reported, there was a certain "WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE IN A FIRE!!!" moment for most of us, but this is probably an overreaction. He supposedly was 228 or whatever during the season and he's just got a metabolism that eats him down quickly if he's stationary. The upside of that metabolism is that he's a spring in short pants, so maybe we're trying to have it both ways here.
I'll watch some more film, but there's a big chance of major regrets if we pass on him. Realistically, most of the project bigs we're talking about are going to take just as long to develop as Nerlens anyway. So, F' it, right?
Even though Ernie being in a lame duck year makes the pick look unlikely, Ted, as much crap as he deservedly gets for a lot of things, well might just say "F' it, Ern, pick him. PICK HIM!". I strongly suspect that we can acquire at least some incremental improvement type players with expiring Ernie's Kids®, a willingness to take on 2015 salary and minor sweetener.
F' it. Take him if he's there and fondle your worry beads until he comes back at Christmas, or 'Noel', if you prefer.





















