ImageImageImageImageImage

#3 for Ilyasova being discussed

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 17,093
And1: 4,206
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#141 » by dobrojim » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:37 pm

fishercob wrote:I admit to being amused by this thread and the one on the trade board. People are going insane, truly, about nothing.

We don't have a single published report saying the Wiz are exploring trading the pick, pursuing Ilyasova, anything like that. Nary a tweet from main guys on the NBA beat -- woj, Aldridge, Marc stein, mannix, etc. Nothing from Mike Lee or anyone local.

We've had a couple of tweeted (but not written -- I.e passing no editorial snuff) reports acknowledging a "rumor" of a potential trade from fringe personalities/writers in Milwaukee and Cleveland. And then we have an anonymous board mod (who I'm sure is a lovely fellow) saying "oh, there's something to this. I have sources on the inside."

So really, we have nothing. This seems to be a classic Internet-age rumor that has grown off of itself, but has little substance. Don't get me wrong. It's fun. But there is nothing I have read here or elsewhere that leads me to believe a trade is or ever was close.

Back to your regularly scheduled freakout!


Agreed Fish. In spite of whatever my feelings are about GMEG, I'm taking this with a huge
grain of salt.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,751
And1: 23,274
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#142 » by nate33 » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:49 pm

Dat2U wrote:So Ernie trades the Rashard Lewis expiring (and eating up all our potential cap room last season in the process) for Okafor & Ariza.

Meantime, we pass on Harden because were afraid to pay him, partly due to the $42 million in contracts we took on in the Okafor/Ariza deal.

And because we took the Okafor/Ariza deal, we took ourselves out of the running for either Ilyasova or Anderson when they were unrestricted free agents.

Now, we get lucky enough to get the 3rd pick in the draft following a bust of a season where we won 29 games, and were now hearing rumors of Grunfeld willing to trade the 3rd & Okafor for Illyasova, the guy we could have simply signed last year had we not traded for Okafor in the first place.

And people wonder why I always freak out about Ernie.

Ernie Grunfeld?

Image
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,830
And1: 7,963
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#143 » by montestewart » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:20 pm

Great series of posts, Dat2U. Really getting to the core of Wizards fan scheissegeist.
User avatar
TripleDouble
Senior
Posts: 535
And1: 19
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
     

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#144 » by TripleDouble » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:25 pm

dobrojim wrote:
fishercob wrote:We don't have a single published report saying the Wiz are exploring trading the pick, pursuing Ilyasova, anything like that. Nary a tweet from main guys on the NBA beat -- woj, Aldridge, Marc stein, mannix, etc. Nothing from Mike Lee or anyone local.


Agreed Fish. In spite of whatever my feelings are about GMEG, I'm taking this with a huge
grain of salt.


http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nba/rumors/post?id=9369


FYI - for those with insider you can verify it for those who don't have it. That said if there is a report about it, the deal is already likely dead otherwise I doubt it would be leaked to ESPN. Typically the only "inside" stuff that comes out early is either by people who don't really matter (i.e. message board posters who have no large scale credibility), or the teams have already moved on and have allowed their sources to confirm.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,754
And1: 4,597
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#145 » by closg00 » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:29 pm

ESPN is just late reporting the rumor, there was nothing new in the ESPN piece.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 278
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#146 » by WizarDynasty » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:29 pm

After further analysis, the 9th plus Derrick Williams is a little bit better than ilya and 15th as long as i was confident Wizards were going to select Adams with the 9th. Were case scenario is that we have Shabazz and Derrick Williams.
I think D.Williams has great body control with the basketball and he can consistently finish through contact. He has absolutely horrible lower body strength so he can't play the 4 full time but he is better than any of our bench bigs so that is an upgrade. Getting Adams to develop as our bigman of the future is huge because Okafor is going to want an extension on his salary which kills any chances for us with him and Nene eating up half the cap even though they have never won anything prior to coming to the wizards. Never carried a team deep in the playoffs on their backs. So I don't see Okafor being here after a year and having Adams becomes even more important because this team has big fat zero for above average rebounding, shotblocking, post presence, with a high motor in one person on this team.
I don't see Bennett lasting until 9th. I would rather have Derrick Williams and Adams, than Ilyasova and D-league talent at the 15th spot. The wolves are a much better trading partner than the Bucks.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
User avatar
TripleDouble
Senior
Posts: 535
And1: 19
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
     

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#147 » by TripleDouble » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:33 pm

closg00 wrote:ESPN is just late reporting the rumor, there was nothing new in the ESPN piece.


Agreed - just addressing the quote "We don't have a single published report saying the Wiz are exploring trading the pick, pursuing Ilyasova, or anything like that". I will edit my post to make it more clear - for further clarity Ford thinks the Wizards are sitting pretty with the #3 pick, but ESPN had their reporter confirm that talks took place. They guessed it was about 50/50 which means it is more likely 90/10 not happening.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,567
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#148 » by LyricalRico » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:36 pm

I'd be more interested in something like 3+38+54+Vesely+Seraphin+Singleton for Ryan Anderson and #6. Probably a long shot, though.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#149 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:29 pm

TripleDouble wrote:
dobrojim wrote:
fishercob wrote:We don't have a single published report saying the Wiz are exploring trading the pick, pursuing Ilyasova, anything like that. Nary a tweet from main guys on the NBA beat -- woj, Aldridge, Marc stein, mannix, etc. Nothing from Mike Lee or anyone local.


Agreed Fish. In spite of whatever my feelings are about GMEG, I'm taking this with a huge
grain of salt.


http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nba/rumors/post?id=9369


FYI - for those with insider you can verify it for those who don't have it. That said if there is a report about it, the deal is already likely dead otherwise I doubt it would be leaked to ESPN. Typically the only "inside" stuff that comes out early is either by people who don't really matter (i.e. message board posters who have no large scale credibility), or the teams have already moved on and have allowed their sources to confirm.


To be clear, this is just ESPN insider repeating the Woelful/Amico report that there was a rumor. There's no new reporting here and theres still nothing in print that would require an editorial review. There have been tweets and radio discussions about the existence of a rumor, but still nothing saying that discussions actually took place -- certainly nothing saying anyone has made an actual offer.

That world is so competitive. If there was anything here, don't you think we'd have heard more from Woj, Aldridge, Mannix, Broussardd, Mike Lee, etc? We have nothing.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#150 » by sfam » Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:37 pm

fishercob wrote:
TripleDouble wrote:
dobrojim wrote:
Agreed Fish. In spite of whatever my feelings are about GMEG, I'm taking this with a huge
grain of salt.


http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nba/rumors/post?id=9369


FYI - for those with insider you can verify it for those who don't have it. That said if there is a report about it, the deal is already likely dead otherwise I doubt it would be leaked to ESPN. Typically the only "inside" stuff that comes out early is either by people who don't really matter (i.e. message board posters who have no large scale credibility), or the teams have already moved on and have allowed their sources to confirm.


To be clear, this is just ESPN insider repeating the Woelful/Amico report that there was a rumor. There's no new reporting here and theres still nothing in print that would require an editorial review. There have been tweets and radio discussions about the existence of a rumor, but still nothing saying that discussions actually took place -- certainly nothing saying anyone has made an actual offer.

That world is so competitive. If there was anything here, don't you think we'd have heard more from Woj, Aldridge, Mannix, Broussardd, Mike Lee, etc? We have nothing.

So the jist of this thread is we've concluded there's nothing to this rumor but it angers us because it sounds like something EG would do, and that Lebron jipped Birdman out of the MVP this year.
jtrinaldi
Banned User
Posts: 1,040
And1: 22
Joined: Jan 16, 2009

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#151 » by jtrinaldi » Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:47 pm

You guys really under-estimate how good ERS is. He is better than Porter will ever be. Have fun with the 3 pick in one of the worst years to have a good pick in the draft.
User avatar
TripleDouble
Senior
Posts: 535
And1: 19
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
     

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#152 » by TripleDouble » Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:49 pm

fishercob wrote:
TripleDouble wrote:
dobrojim wrote:
Agreed Fish. In spite of whatever my feelings are about GMEG, I'm taking this with a huge
grain of salt.


http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nba/rumors/post?id=9369


FYI - for those with insider you can verify it for those who don't have it. That said if there is a report about it, the deal is already likely dead otherwise I doubt it would be leaked to ESPN. Typically the only "inside" stuff that comes out early is either by people who don't really matter (i.e. message board posters who have no large scale credibility), or the teams have already moved on and have allowed their sources to confirm.


To be clear, this is just ESPN insider repeating the Woelful/Amico report that there was a rumor. There's no new reporting here and theres still nothing in print that would require an editorial review. There have been tweets and radio discussions about the existence of a rumor, but still nothing saying that discussions actually took place -- certainly nothing saying anyone has made an actual offer.

That world is so competitive. If there was anything here, don't you think we'd have heard more from Woj, Aldridge, Mannix, Broussardd, Mike Lee, etc? We have nothing.


So you only accept confirmation that a team has "explored" something from "Woj, Aldridge, Mannix, Broussardd, Mike Lee"? Interesting criteria, but under those guidelines, than yes this is only a message board thing.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,220
And1: 8,048
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#153 » by Dat2U » Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:51 pm

jtrinaldi wrote:You guys really under-estimate how good ERS is. He is better than Porter will ever be. Have fun with the 3 pick in one of the worst years to have a good pick in the draft.


Um, ok whatever you say boss. :-?
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#154 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:00 pm

TripleDouble wrote:
fishercob wrote:
TripleDouble wrote:
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nba/rumors/post?id=9369


FYI - for those with insider you can verify it for those who don't have it. That said if there is a report about it, the deal is already likely dead otherwise I doubt it would be leaked to ESPN. Typically the only "inside" stuff that comes out early is either by people who don't really matter (i.e. message board posters who have no large scale credibility), or the teams have already moved on and have allowed their sources to confirm.


To be clear, this is just ESPN insider repeating the Woelful/Amico report that there was a rumor. There's no new reporting here and theres still nothing in print that would require an editorial review. There have been tweets and radio discussions about the existence of a rumor, but still nothing saying that discussions actually took place -- certainly nothing saying anyone has made an actual offer.

That world is so competitive. If there was anything here, don't you think we'd have heard more from Woj, Aldridge, Mannix, Broussardd, Mike Lee, etc? We have nothing.


So you only accept confirmation that a team has "explored" something from "Woj, Aldridge, Mannix, Broussardd, Mike Lee"? Interesting criteria, but under those guidelines, than yes this is only a message board thing.


It's not about what I accept. When is the last time that NBA transaction news got reported and wasn't then "confirmed" by half a dozen other journalists within 15 minutes, let alone two days? If there was something here, more guys would be on it.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,372
And1: 7,472
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#155 » by FAH1223 » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:14 pm

jtrinaldi wrote:You guys really under-estimate how good ERS is. He is better than Porter will ever be. Have fun with the 3 pick in one of the worst years to have a good pick in the draft.


nah, he's inconsistent

I'd only do this trade if we got #15 and the unprotected 2014 first round pick

They'd have to take Vesley/Booker
Image
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,317
And1: 2,473
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#156 » by nuposse04 » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:34 pm

jtrinaldi wrote:You guys really under-estimate how good ERS is. He is better than Porter will ever be. Have fun with the 3 pick in one of the worst years to have a good pick in the draft.


Is this an attempt at frustrated trolling case the trade doesn't come into fruition? Porter is already far more athletic then Ersan, in the most difficult conference in collegiate basketball, with no real other consistent options on his team lead his team a regular season conference title.

He has bust potential for sure....but I see his floor as Batum...who is absolutely a starting caliber 3 on a good team. Ersan is a 6th man off the bench...he has very little utility outside of small ball. There are enough girthy young 4/5s where he would be exposed defensively. Not to mention Ariza/Okafor expire and Porter would be on a rookie contract so we could use our capspace to focus on getting something that fits a larger NEED, Ersan would be a luxury, but he is by no means a Need. Still a good player though :P
User avatar
TripleDouble
Senior
Posts: 535
And1: 19
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
     

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#157 » by TripleDouble » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:41 pm

fishercob wrote:It's not about what I accept. When is the last time that NBA transaction news got reported and wasn't then "confirmed" by half a dozen other journalists within 15 minutes, let alone two days? If there was something here, more guys would be on it.


Lol, I think you way overestimated how little national media cares about anything Bucks related, but I do understand your thought process even if I don't agree.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#158 » by Ruzious » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:44 pm

Fwiw, on the Milwaukee side - some have speculated they use some of their cap space on Millsap - if they trade Ilyasova. So the trade would help them increase their talent level. Bottom line - they'd have to include the 15th pick in the trade - if they really are discussing a trade. And there will be a solid center prospect available with that pick.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,921
And1: 30,264
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#159 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:22 pm

TripleDouble wrote:
Lol, I think you way overestimated how little national media cares about anything Bucks related, but I do understand your thought process even if I don't agree.


This.

And not to slight the Wizards, but not a lot of national interest there either. Woj is more concerned with LeBron's shin splints than a Wizards-Bucks trade.

Because we have no national media following our team and really no local media, our RealGm board has taken on the mantle of doing the reporting for us. Collectively our board many times gets the inside scoop on a deal anywhere from three hours to three days before things take place. We were talking about Monta Ellis 3-year extension about three weeks ago, before it got leaked out last week.

In a story you guys would appreciate, Ernie G's inlaws are from Milwaukee. One time we had one of his relatives post on our board about three days beforehand that Jamaal Magloire was being dealt from the Bucks to Portland.

I have no doubt that these Ersan/#3 discussions took place. The fact no national writers have confirmed this could actually indicate discussions are still going on. Or they are dead. We will find out as we get closer to draft time. The fact you want to know is what date does Okafor have to formally decline his ETO? On that date, Okafor then has a contract eligible to be traded. For Monta Ellis his ETO date is June 20th. The date is usually set by the team and player in the original contract.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: #3 for Ilyasova being discussed 

Post#160 » by JWizmentality » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:44 pm

jtrinaldi wrote:You guys really under-estimate how good ERS is. He is better than Porter will ever be. Have fun with the 3 pick in one of the worst years to have a good pick in the draft.


So your thinking is that we just don't know what we could get out of Porter and we should take Ersan because hey, that's 17pts and whatever else. It's a sure thing.

But when you ask Bucks fans why they want to get rid of such a commodity, it's because they believe they have a gem in Henson and want him to start...even though they don't know what they'll get out of him?

This is like some awesome Jedi mind trick. :o

Return to Washington Wizards