nate33 wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:nate33 wrote:Oh dear God, not this again.
Vesely is being asked to play PF because HE LACKS THE SKILLS TO PLAY SMALL FORWARD!!! You can't play him there because it WON'T WORK. How many teams in this league can function offensively with a small forward who can't shoot or dribble? The answer is ZERO!!!
What kind of skills did Derrick McKey have? (Read style and career section of wiki)
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derrick_McKeyhttp://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... lse-1.htmlPrecedent: There have been near seven-foot SFs who did not have perimeter skills. Derrick McKey played on several playoff teams as a. 6' 10" wing defender. He passed very well and virtually never attempted a three. He was versatile enough to play PF or C, but SF was his best position.
In 2004-2005, the Wizards advanced to round two in the Eastern Conference Playoffs starting Arenas, Hughes, Jared Jeffries (6'11", 230 lbs -- around the same as Vesely), Jamison, and Haywood. Jeffries played next to a stretch four. The Wizards won in a non-traditional manner. Vesely can definitely be utilized similarly to Jeffries. It just takes an open-minded approach. EJ even played Jefffries at SG a time or two.
A lot of tall guys have played SF. These guys all could shoot: Pau Gasol, Kevin Garnett, Robert Horry, Walter McCarty, Toni Kukoc, Hedo Turkoglu, Steve Novak. I think Vesely can defend as well as any of them except young KG. I bet he rebounds and passe better than most or at least on par. Vesely is a player in the Noah mold who is not quite suited to play C full-time, but in spots can play SF, PF, and a transition-friendly C in open court game situations.
I believe Vesely can best be utilized like McKey and Jeffries.
As tontoz pointed out, McKey was a competent shooter. During his peak years, he averaged 16 points per game and shot 84% from the FT line. Vesely is not even in the same zip code as a basketball player. Comparing the two is absurd. You may as well be comparing Vesely to Glen Rice.
Jeffries is the best case scenaro for Vesely, and Vesely is a far cry from reaching even that. Jeffries had a better handle than Vesely ever will. The only reason Jeffries at SG/SF worked at all was because his team had deadly 3-point shooting from the PG position and the PF position - a luxury that we don't have. If you want a better example of what Jeffries would look like on a conventional team, look no further than his career in NY. He was a terrible player in NY. After years of fumbling around trying to be useful, he finally ended up settling into a role where he was a barely competent role player... at
power forward.
When Melo was out, Jeffries was terrific when he played with Chandler and Steve Novak, with Lin at the point. Jeffries played great defense and was an excellent facilitator at the height of Linsanity. Novak hitting threes and smart. team play won games.
In his 4 starts the Knicks won all 4 games. Between 2/4/12 and 2/15/12 the Knicks won 7 straight, with Jeffries rating a plus in all seven games.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... elog/2012/The Knicks were 8-0 in games with Jeffries on the court 26+ minutes. How was that possible, nate? He was terrible for the Knicks?
People say things like Vesely is terrible and six straight wins with him starting as a rookie don't count for various reasons. I say the guy can be useful. There is a way to get the best out of any player. The problem is organizations that assassinate character and which do not develop the very players they foolishly draft. Space the floor and figure out a way to get Vesely in a comfort zone. Oleksiy Pecherov had the same skill set as a Matt Bonner but not the grit, determination, and good fortune to come up with the Spurs. Unlike with Pecherov, the Wizards have a good defensive core with rugged bigs. They could use his skill set now.
Vesely fits somewhere but not where he's being asked to morph into a different player.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.