Image ImageImage Image

LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2

Moderators: HomoSapien, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN

User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1101 » by TylerB » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:09 pm

Leto wrote:
Jimmy Forums wrote:
Leto wrote:If you want equal value for Aldridge its Boozer plus picks--like it or not. Personally, I'd give up Booz, Mirotic OR CHA pick, Bulls 2014 1st. Take it or leave it.

Noooo this is how you know there's no valid comparison between the two. Anything centered around Boozer is not even close.



That's not even an argument. Its simply a statement that you say is true..because you say so. I disagree. I do not have to go far to see what Boozer is capable of doing and its not far off from Aldridge--like it or not.


Well its not equal value because Boozer is like 5 years older. But as far as value for the upcoming season in a vacuum it is pretty close.

Portland certainly isn't interested in Boozer because of his age
User avatar
Tenchi Ryu
RealGM
Posts: 17,372
And1: 6,426
Joined: Aug 04, 2012
Location: South Side Wild 100's
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1102 » by Tenchi Ryu » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:11 pm

red222 wrote:
Tenchi Ryu wrote:I honestly wonder if people here even care about Portland getting at least somewhat equal value in return.

In this league you rarely get equal value in a trade for a guy that wants out? So why should we offer equal value to Portland?

That doesn't mean we get to commit daylight robbery though. We aren't the only team that would like LMA, and with a laughable offer, they have every right to tell us to go to hell and choose another team to deal with.
[x] Fire Thibs
[x] Fire Kirk
[x] Fire Noah
[x] Fire GarPax
User avatar
Jimmy Forums
Veteran
Posts: 2,833
And1: 970
Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Location: Midwest
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1103 » by Jimmy Forums » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:13 pm

Leto wrote:
Jimmy Forums wrote:
Leto wrote:If you want equal value for Aldridge its Boozer plus picks--like it or not. Personally, I'd give up Booz, Mirotic OR CHA pick, Bulls 2014 1st. Take it or leave it.

Noooo this is how you know there's no valid comparison between the two. Anything centered around Boozer is not even close.



That's not even an argument. Its simply a statement that you say is true..because you say so. I disagree. I do not have to go far to see what Boozer is capable of doing and its not far off from Aldridge--like it or not.

I wasn't gonna make an argument. You shouldn't need convinced.
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1104 » by TylerB » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:14 pm

I also think Taj and Mirotic and picks is a shortsighted move on our part. It doesn't make us that much better and makes us way less versatile and mortgages the future a little.

In the playoffs Taj Gibson is a valuable player. He can give minutes against any team and any matchup. Like watching the finals they got to a point where Splitter, their starting center, was basically unplayable because of the matchup and it really hurt them because when they took Duncan out in those last two games Miami would always immediately go on a run so Duncan couldn't rest.

Why give up Taj who can give 25 minutes against anyone in theory if need be when the guy you are getting doesn't even fit into the teams identity of tough defense and hard play.
BIGGIEsmalls 23
Banned User
Posts: 13,283
And1: 810
Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Location: REALITY
   

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1105 » by BIGGIEsmalls 23 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:14 pm

Tenchi Ryu wrote:
red222 wrote:
Tenchi Ryu wrote:I honestly wonder if people here even care about Portland getting at least somewhat equal value in return.

In this league you rarely get equal value in a trade for a guy that wants out? So why should we offer equal value to Portland?

That doesn't mean we get to commit daylight robbery though. We aren't the only team that would like LMA, and with a laughable offer, they have every right to tell us to go to hell and choose another team to deal with.

Then, LMA threatens to not re-sign with that other team.

Every day that passes......his contract gets shorter & his power GROWS.
User avatar
Mech Engineer
RealGM
Posts: 16,802
And1: 4,804
Joined: Apr 10, 2012
Location: NW Suburbs

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1106 » by Mech Engineer » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:15 pm

Tenchi Ryu wrote:
red222 wrote:
Tenchi Ryu wrote:I honestly wonder if people here even care about Portland getting at least somewhat equal value in return.

In this league you rarely get equal value in a trade for a guy that wants out? So why should we offer equal value to Portland?

That doesn't mean we get to commit daylight robbery though. We aren't the only team that would like LMA, and with a laughable offer, they have every right to tell us to go to hell and choose another team to deal with.

That's the challenge. You definitely don't want to give dollar back for a dollar but also not try to scam them with paying 20 cents for a dollar. The team which figures out the right value to give back when the player wants out comes out as the winner.
Leto
RealGM
Posts: 13,748
And1: 468
Joined: Jun 11, 2008

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1107 » by Leto » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:19 pm

"I shouldn't need convinced" is also not an argument.
stepbackjftw
Pro Prospect
Posts: 812
And1: 590
Joined: Sep 15, 2012

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1108 » by stepbackjftw » Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:21 pm

BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:
Tenchi Ryu wrote:
red222 wrote:In this league you rarely get equal value in a trade for a guy that wants out? So why should we offer equal value to Portland?

That doesn't mean we get to commit daylight robbery though. We aren't the only team that would like LMA, and with a laughable offer, they have every right to tell us to go to hell and choose another team to deal with.

Then, LMA threatens to not re-sign with that other team.

Every day that passes......his contract gets shorter & his power GROWS.



but he also gets older, once players hit 30 they are on a decline
BIGGIEsmalls 23
Banned User
Posts: 13,283
And1: 810
Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Location: REALITY
   

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1109 » by BIGGIEsmalls 23 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:05 pm

^^^If that's the case, no team would be calling Portland asking for him.

He only has two years left on his contract. Any team that attempts to trade assets for him will most certainly re-sign him to a new contract. The teams that want him today are not worried about his age today, so they wouldn't be worried in two years from today.
Chitownbulls
General Manager
Posts: 8,573
And1: 2,463
Joined: Jun 05, 2013

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1110 » by Chitownbulls » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:13 pm

Aldridge an Boozer comparisons are really bad....Aldridge is a wayyy better player

Really want Aldridge on this team, a young big to grow with Rose is exactly what we need to help get us to the ship.
DENG HE SUCKS!!!!
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,189
And1: 13,052
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1111 » by dice » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:29 pm

Chitownbulls wrote:Aldridge an Boozer comparisons are really bad....Aldridge is a wayyy better player

unfortunately there's no evidence to back up that assertion other than the prettiness of his shot or post moves. 'cause that prettiness certainly isn't translating into buckets frequently enough
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
User avatar
BR0D1E86
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 2,292
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1112 » by BR0D1E86 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:31 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
Leto wrote:Says you. I disagree, obviously.

Amare did not put up 16/10 with a 17 PER this season. Boozer did and led us to a playoff birth.


Boozer was apart of a team attack that helped lead the Bulls to a playoff birth.

Boozer does not have positive value as a trade asset. Neither does Amar'e. If Knicks fans were like "Amar'e/picks for Noah" everyone here would laugh it off.

Boozer + picks is just as laughable for Aldridge.

I don't think it's nearly as laughable, but I'd still laugh at it if I was Portland. And I am neither especially in love with Aldridge nor especially low on Boozer.
Polynice4Pippen
RealGM
Posts: 46,674
And1: 13,180
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Planet Earth. With more questions than answers.
     

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1113 » by Polynice4Pippen » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:40 pm

Man, people clearly forgetting tall the Boozer no shows in the playoffs. When's Boozer's at his best, yeah Aldridge isn't THAT much better than Boozer. But Boozer is inconsistent :o Shocking, I know. Boozer's been benched in 4th quarters of playoff games, finished with single digit points in playoff games. He stunk against Philly in 2012 when we needed him. He puts up a strong game, then no shows, strong game, then no shows. Boozer is a consistent rebounder and passer, and a consistently awful defender. But his offense comes and goes and is far too unpredictable to ever be depended upon. Aldridge is just a more consistent basketball player than Boozer, he has the length to not be bothered by taller PF's in the playoffs, he has a go to move that he can get off any time down the floor. Aldridge is built for playoff consistency in a way Boozer isn't.
Jerry Reinsdorf; the undisputed king of allowing his GM's to run amok with unchecked power and ego. :king:
User avatar
Jajwanda
General Manager
Posts: 8,611
And1: 105
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1114 » by Jajwanda » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:44 pm

Any interest in Dwight in a S and T involving Noah+Deng?
User avatar
IWannaGoHIGHER
Veteran
Posts: 2,938
And1: 326
Joined: Jun 07, 2010
Location: McBuckets + Jimmy Buckets = Stacey King Aneurysm
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1115 » by IWannaGoHIGHER » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:47 pm

Jajwanda wrote:Any interest in Dwight in a S and T involving Noah+Deng?


Nope.
User avatar
TheAdmiral
RealGM
Posts: 22,676
And1: 1,213
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
   

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1116 » by TheAdmiral » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:48 pm

What makes you think Dwight would be interested in joining Chicago?
D-31 wrote:again..all of u Jordan fans are caught up in his scoring accolades and fail to realize that he was a lousy basketball player.

Jordan never fully understood basketball. He had the lowest basketball IQ of any NBA "superstar" in history.
red222
RealGM
Posts: 11,513
And1: 2,293
Joined: Feb 08, 2009
       

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1117 » by red222 » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:48 pm

Jajwanda wrote:Any interest in Dwight in a S and T involving Noah+Deng?

are Dwight's balls coming with him? PAUSE
User avatar
Jajwanda
General Manager
Posts: 8,611
And1: 105
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1118 » by Jajwanda » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:49 pm

TheAdmiral wrote:What makes you think Dwight would be interested in joining Chicago?


Why wouldn't he? He has a good friend in Boozer, a large town to play in, a winner, a good surrounding cast. The Bulls with Howard are pretty damn good and there's no question Dwight has been a pain for LeBron to drive in against throughout his career.

Dwight makes Miami's job much more difficult both on the defensive end as well as on offense because of the need to swarm Dwight off the pass. Noah can be guarded by Bosh, Dwight not so much. You need tremendous attention by LeBron/Wade. That leaves a bunch of shooters open.

Deng's future is limited in Chicago meaning that it's really Noah to Dwight.
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1119 » by TylerB » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:52 pm

Chitownbulls wrote:Aldridge an Boozer comparisons are really bad....Aldridge is a wayyy better player


There is no real statistical or observational support to back this up. You just know of Aldridge as that good player on the west coast who you never see play. You don't take into account his defensive and rebounding deficiencies and you aren't aware that his scoring isn't as efficient as you think.
User avatar
TheAdmiral
RealGM
Posts: 22,676
And1: 1,213
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
   

Re: LaMarcus Aldridge Wants Chicago Part 2 

Post#1120 » by TheAdmiral » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:54 pm

I don't for a second buy Dwight's top priority is to win. Dude has proved time and time again he's a diva. Also, with Rose being the top dog in Chicago, he'd have to settle for a 'lesser' role, which he obviously doesn't want.
D-31 wrote:again..all of u Jordan fans are caught up in his scoring accolades and fail to realize that he was a lousy basketball player.

Jordan never fully understood basketball. He had the lowest basketball IQ of any NBA "superstar" in history.

Return to Chicago Bulls