Bucks trade JJ for 2nd rounders (old thread bump)

blazza18 · Post #221 » by **blazza18** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:50 pm

DanoMac wrote:
giraldo5 wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
"I'm sick to my stomach. Why no Bledsoe? This is an absolute disgrace"

Post his damn number

**** it.

Edit

**** yea Dano.

bullox · Post #222 » by **bullox** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:50 pm

Has to be viewed as a victory for the pro-tanking brigade, doesn't it?

Bledsoe is a solid player, but not the type that's going to put this team in contention on his own.

JBucks · Post #223 » by **JBucks** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:50 pm

trwi7 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/cf_gardner/status/352195309608255488[/tweet]

Helping facilitate deal.

Of course Gardner approves.

WeekapaugGroove · Post #224 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:50 pm

andonewheel wrote:I wonder, what will Phoenix do with their PG situation? Dragic is arguably their best player, and now they added another PG. I would rather have Dragic or Bledsoe than Jennings.

This will be interesting. They might play dragic and Bledsoe together. Both have a little tweener guard to their games and dragic was effective playing next to Nash a coue years ago. It really looks like this new suns regime is doesn't believe in Marshall and might get the joe Alexander treatment and not pick up his option.

I'm a fan of both the suns and bucks so this is a bitter sweet day for me.

midranger · Post #225 » by **midranger** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:50 pm

DanoMac wrote:
giraldo5 wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
"I'm sick to my stomach. Why no Bledsoe? This is an absolute disgrace"

Post his damn number

**** it.

Edit

For when he comes to his senses.

jokeboy86 · Post #226 » by **jokeboy86** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:50 pm

humanrefutation wrote:
trwi7 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/352194806111420416[/tweet]

Even Gery knows.

Odd. With the Hunt column earlier in the year and this I'm starting to wonder are some of the media turning on Kohl and this organization. Even Begel hasn't had a column recently defending the Bucks.

My relationship with the Bucks at this point is like Chris Rock's with rap: "I love rap music. You know, I LOVE IT! But I'm tired of defending it".

SkilesTheLimit · Post #227 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:51 pm

trwi7 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/cf_gardner/status/352195309608255488[/tweet]

Helping facilitate deal.

More moves coming? Thanks for the scoop, you freakin hack.

DanoMac · Post #228 » by **DanoMac** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:51 pm

I don't always give out John Hammond's Cell Phone #.

But when I do, it's to the entire RealGM community.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #229 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:51 pm

DanoMac wrote:
giraldo5 wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
"I'm sick to my stomach. Why no Bledsoe? This is an absolute disgrace"

Post his damn number

**** it.

Keep it *somewhat* classy folks.

But let's do this.

Thunder Muscle · Post #230 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:51 pm

Hammond may need a new #, haha!

bullox · Post #231 » by **bullox** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:51 pm

blazza18 wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
giraldo5 wrote:
Post his damn number

**** it.

edit

**** yea Dano.

That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.

Ill-yasova · Post #232 » by **Ill-yasova** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:51 pm

Bucks4Milwaukee wrote:I would of liked Bledsoe, and we should of had him... But you call John Hammond an idiot for getting 2 2nd round picks in a deep draft for a UFA is hardly an intelligent post.

They're second round pick for the love of God! How deep do you think the next draft will be exactly?

Nebula1 · Post #233 » by **Nebula1** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:51 pm

Relax on the # y'all. If that is his #, it shouldn't be posted here so don't do some stupid ****.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #234 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:52 pm

Oh man....I'm going to think about mine for a bit.

Been waiting for this for so long.

Post #235 » by **jr lucosa** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:52 pm

Opinions on Dudley seem to be where I differ from most of you. Dudley is the perfect cheaper replacement for Butler. TS% of at least .575 each of the last 4 seasons.

Our assets I see as possibly more valuable than Dudley to LAC

Sanders
Henson
Ily
1st rounders

That's it.

Udoh, Mam, Ayon aren't netting you what Dudley will.

Are most of you okay with giving up one of those first 4 options to get this done?

jwill535 · Post #236 » by **jwill535** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:52 pm

So the Bucks arent going to play with 7 players and 3 2nd round pics this year? Now that is inside info. Buck Pack, stand down, Gardner's got this.

tski1972 · Post #237 » by **tski1972** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:52 pm

I see BuckPack is online, just waiting to hear what disappointing news he can share with us.

Sonny Carson · Post #238 » by **Sonny Carson** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:52 pm

What I dont get is..

Why not get Marshall?

Yea he's not better than Bledsoe, but its another prospect. Maybe he eventually allows you to move on from Jennings. His former teammate is Henson. Maybe he just needs a new address to really showcase his skills. Why get nothing?

I mean..even if you got Michael Beasley I'd say at least you're hoping this is a Chauncey Billups like "4th time is a charm" type scenario.

But this?

I mean...Raptors fans are laughing because it reminds them of Colangelo type move.

ConoverBucks · Post #239 » by **ConoverBucks** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:52 pm

theFireBlanket wrote:
emunney wrote:I feel snakebit, but it never made sense to me that we'd be getting Bledsoe for Redick. Glad we got something for him, but the best thing here is the TPE.

Chris Paul should be thrilled with this.

But we could have received Bledsoe for Redick, surely. All that Phx contributes to the Clippers was Dudley. We could have offered a player of equal or slightly better worth and didn't.

Who could the Bucks have offered in addition to Redick though? I doubt they would want Moute, Udoh, or Ayon and the Bucks wouldn't add Henson or Ersan. I don't think they'd be all that interested in a pick seeing as they are trying to win now. The Bucks just didn't have what the Clippers were looking for. They wanted two wings players who can shoot and they got them. The Bucks couldn't offer that.

DanoMac · Post #240 » by **DanoMac** » Tue Jul 2, 2013 10:52 pm

bullox wrote:
blazza18 wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
**** it.

edit-xxxx

**** yea Dano.

That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.

I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.