blazza18 wrote:JayMKE wrote:I'm assuming that Bogut deal is pretty incentive laden, otherwise he got a pretty big deal considering his injury history.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SpearsNBAYahoo/status/393916026640801792[/tweet]
I think that all seems pretty reasonable. I would think Bogut actually staying on the floor for 65 games pushes him close to most of those categories.
paulpressey25 wrote:blazza18 wrote:
Go look at who would replace him if they didn't bank on him.
We used to say that about Michael Redd also.....
Really Press? Baiting quite hard in this thread, and probably specifically Paul.





















