Fat Kat wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/tommybeer/status/405349026125455360[/tweet]
OH BOY --- Iman lovers running for door.
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Fat Kat wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/tommybeer/status/405349026125455360[/tweet]
knicks85 wrote:GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:so the contentious environment of a nonresponding losing team would not directly influence a young player?
You're assuming the only difference between a winning environment and a losing environment is Woodson.
You're also assuming that Shump's entire reason for being in the NBA, defense, should be affected by anything else but his lack of effort.
the identity of the team is set by the coach... watching a game its clear we do not have an identity... ala Woodson... clear we have no discipline as well.. yes sports are a great deal psychological when you startsecond guessing yourself their is hesitation..
GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:GONYK wrote:
I'm not seeing what one has to do with the other
so the contentious environment of a nonresponding losing team would not directly influence a young player?
You're assuming the only difference between a winning environment and a losing environment is Woodson.
You're also assuming that Shump's entire reason for being in the NBA, defense, should be affected by anything else but his lack of effort.
@HerringWSJ @a4ltito PG had 17 points on 5/16 shooting in 34 mins Shumpert was on the floor. Scored 18 on 7/10 in the 15 Shumpert was out.
@HerringWSJ @JADubin5 Hibbert said afterwards that they saw that matchup and immediately/repeatedly targeted Smith and Bargs in PnR.
Johnny Hoops wrote:Fat Kat wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/tommybeer/status/405349026125455360[/tweet]
OH BOY --- Iman lovers running for door.
GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:GONYK wrote:
You're assuming the only difference between a winning environment and a losing environment is Woodson.
You're also assuming that Shump's entire reason for being in the NBA, defense, should be affected by anything else but his lack of effort.
the identity of the team is set by the coach... watching a game its clear we do not have an identity... ala Woodson... clear we have no discipline as well.. yes sports are a great deal psychological when you startsecond guessing yourself their is hesitation..
There is no hesitation on defense. That is strictly effort and recognition. Shump has always had subpar recognition, but now his effort is also flailing and he's complaining about shots.
Perhaps Woody has lost the team, but you are completely absolving Shump, and that is not right either.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
knickabocker88 wrote:GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:so the contentious environment of a nonresponding losing team would not directly influence a young player?
You're assuming the only difference between a winning environment and a losing environment is Woodson.
You're also assuming that Shump's entire reason for being in the NBA, defense, should be affected by anything else but his lack of effort.
Woodson has a double standard, if Woody turns a blind eye for every late rotation JR makes, every dumb shot he take, every awful pass he makes yet Yanks Shumpert for 1 bad play it would effect him.
Shumpert out there playing scared afraid to make mistakes.
As for Shumpert's defense and energy, if you don't touch the ball guess what it's gonna have a neg effect on the other end as well.@HerringWSJ @a4ltito PG had 17 points on 5/16 shooting in 34 mins Shumpert was on the floor. Scored 18 on 7/10 in the 15 Shumpert was out.@HerringWSJ @JADubin5 Hibbert said afterwards that they saw that matchup and immediately/repeatedly targeted Smith and Bargs in PnR.
Jimmy Buttler could be a Knick ... and you guys would want to run him outta town too.
GONYK wrote:SuperflyKnick wrote:bornaknick1 wrote:He's a below average 2 guard and a decent rotation player at best. He has shown little to no improvement since his rookie year and has regressed as a shooter. His ball-handling is terrible and defensively has been as bad as everyone on this team. Going 0'fer on the stat sheet in 20 plus minutes of play is inexcusable for a NBA player, never mind a starter. Trade rumors don't create terrible play on that level.
Fact is he was overhyped by most Knick fans for a) having a cool haircut b) having a cool personality c) being athletic. He showed some flashes in his rookie year but its clear he won't show much more than that. Definitely not untradeable as one of our few viable assets.
I know its not a excuse but how would you feel wen ur coach is constantly on ur ass for the smallest things but lets guys like Jr smith chuck away.... not to mentioned he hears he will be traded every single second last couple of weeks.... The guy has lost his swagger and confidence no thanks to the coach and owner
It's really thanks to his inability to handle the ball and his regression on defense.
knickabocker88 wrote:GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:so the contentious environment of a nonresponding losing team would not directly influence a young player?
You're assuming the only difference between a winning environment and a losing environment is Woodson.
You're also assuming that Shump's entire reason for being in the NBA, defense, should be affected by anything else but his lack of effort.
Woodson has a double standard, if Woody turns a blind eye for every late rotation JR makes, every dumb shot he take, every awful pass he makes yet Yanks Shumpert for 1 bad play it would effect him.
Shumpert out there playing scared afraid to make mistakes.
As for Shumpert's defense and energy, if you don't touch the ball guess what it's gonna have a neg effect on the other end as well.@HerringWSJ @a4ltito PG had 17 points on 5/16 shooting in 34 mins Shumpert was on the floor. Scored 18 on 7/10 in the 15 Shumpert was out.@HerringWSJ @JADubin5 Hibbert said afterwards that they saw that matchup and immediately/repeatedly targeted Smith and Bargs in PnR.
Jimmy Buttler could be a Knick ... and you guys would want to run him outta town too.
seren wrote:Shump is very low on the list of our problems. If we can trade him for a competent starting quality PG, by all means let's do it. Otherwise, STFU.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
MaseInYourFace wrote:Honestly his d has not been as good but it's still probably the best on the team. I know that's not saying much but man to man he's still probably our best defender.
Johnny Hoops wrote:GONYK wrote:SuperflyKnick wrote:
I know its not a excuse but how would you feel wen ur coach is constantly on ur ass for the smallest things but lets guys like Jr smith chuck away.... not to mentioned he hears he will be traded every single second last couple of weeks.... The guy has lost his swagger and confidence no thanks to the coach and owner
It's really thanks to his inability to handle the ball and his regression on defense.
Let me add -- that outside of knocking down some catch and shoot 3-pointers --- this kid has virtually no-other offensive game. You may get the occasional -- over dribble between the legs and knock down a bad 18 footer but other than that he has NO GAME. He can barely get to the rim without tripping himself, he can't play with his back to the basket, he has no-floater - there is NO craftyness to his game. The play last night where hedribbled into 2 defenders and slung the ball over the baseline was Iman's game to a tee.
GONYK wrote:MaseInYourFace wrote:Honestly his d has not been as good but it's still probably the best on the team. I know that's not saying much but man to man he's still probably our best defender.
He is our best individual defender. He still struggles with rotations and defending as part of a team concept.
GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:hes clearly stressing...this is not a clear reflection of his skills... Woodson must go
I'm not seeing what one has to do with the other
Johnny Hoops wrote:GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:hes clearly stressing...this is not a clear reflection of his skills... Woodson must go
I'm not seeing what one has to do with the other
Woodson was coaching Shump last season when everyone started going ga-ga over Shump's potential coming into this season. Same coach - different player.
Biggest mistake may have been trying to convince him he was a scorer and that he needed to take a big-step forward in that department. Best advice would have been to tell him to be the best defender in the league and take whatever came on offense.
GONYK wrote:MaseInYourFace wrote:Honestly his d has not been as good but it's still probably the best on the team. I know that's not saying much but man to man he's still probably our best defender.
He is our best individual defender. He still struggles with rotations and defending as part of a team concept.
GONYK wrote:MaseInYourFace wrote:Honestly his d has not been as good but it's still probably the best on the team. I know that's not saying much but man to man he's still probably our best defender.
He is our best individual defender. He still struggles with rotations and defending as part of a team concept.