LUKE23 wrote:The chances of #8 being better than Sanders are pretty slim to me.
I disagree. I think the chances are 50-50 that a player drafted at 8 will be better than Sanders in this draft.
The upside is definitely higher, floor is lower. But if I had to roll the dice and shed 44M from the books.. count me in. For as good as Sanders is offensively, his net impact on the offensive end is a wash. I understand the love, but he shouldn't be in the 5 year plan for this team. This is how we need to look at this draft.
Kings Scenario
Sanders for #8
Lakers Scenario
Nash+1 for Sanders+ Knight or Henson.
Buyout agreement with Nash if he wants it, which he probably would. Draft McBuckets at 7 or 8. Personally, i think he might vault ahead of Randle/Vonleh/Smart... just depends on who is drafting and for what.
Trade from 2 to 3. Get 3/10.
Three lotto picks. 1 less cancer, 1 less chucker, OKC rebuild on track... top 5 pick in the 2015 draft. 2015 is just plum loaded with bigs. If Embiid is there at 3 and his back is 100%.. ok draft him, otherwise.. wait until 2015. There are so many bigs in that draft. Im not 100% sold that Philly will trade the 10 to move up 1 spot, depends on how much of a jones they have to get either Wiggins or Parker. They could use a 3 for the future in a pretty big way, not so much point guard or center. We are in the position where we literally could use a player at any position on the court. Giannis is a great player to have, but I wouldn't be not drafting Parker or Wiggins because Giannis could play the 2 or 3 just fine.
Khris Middleton - Beating up on Trash Can Teams since 1943. Invisible Man status otherwise.