ImageImageImageImage

The Dante Exum Thread

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

User avatar
thelead
RealGM
Posts: 46,946
And1: 30,495
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
 

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#241 » by thelead » Fri May 23, 2014 1:24 pm

Smooth_E wrote:
thelead wrote:
Smooth_E wrote:
I personally would roll the dice and just wait it out until the back is 100000000% fine. He is way too talented to pass up, and he's still young too, so we can wait.

Chronic injuries happen when you rush the player back too soon. The player either hasn't healed completely physically, or isn't prepared mentally for the return. Big men with that type of potential are worth rolling the dice for. I may be alone in that mentality but that's alright.


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAyKJAtDNCw[/youtube]



:lol: :lol: Dammit I love that song. I am man enough to admit that I enjoy Michael Jackson's music.


There can't be a soul who can deny this kind of talent:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bR4L0Y94AQ[/youtube]

One of the best singers/artists ever.
Image
User avatar
Smooth_E
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,582
And1: 530
Joined: Apr 11, 2013
 

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#242 » by Smooth_E » Fri May 23, 2014 1:27 pm

thelead wrote:
Smooth_E wrote:
thelead wrote:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAyKJAtDNCw[/youtube]



:lol: :lol: Dammit I love that song. I am man enough to admit that I enjoy Michael Jackson's music.


There can't be a soul who can deny this kind of talent:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bR4L0Y94AQ[/youtube]

One of the best singers/artists ever.



Shoot, I've been practicing my moon walk since I was 7 years old. Burning my feet on my grandparents' carpet before and after school lol
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,944
And1: 14,872
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#243 » by tiderulz » Fri May 23, 2014 1:29 pm

Optimus_Steel wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
Optimus_Steel wrote:
Guys like Andrew Bogut, Luc Longley, Aron Baynes, and Patty Mills have come from AIS so its legit.


didnt Patty Mills play extremely well in Australian ball and FIBA or something like that? and he is a backup PG. I wouldnt pick Longley in the top 20 this year, and Baynes not at all.




My point is that several NBA caliber players have come from there so we shouldn't discredit the place because of the perceived level of competition.


no, totally agree with that, wasnt trying to down play it. Probably shouldnt have quoted you in my statement.
User avatar
Smooth_E
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,582
And1: 530
Joined: Apr 11, 2013
 

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#244 » by Smooth_E » Fri May 23, 2014 1:36 pm

tiderulz wrote:
Optimus_Steel wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
didnt Patty Mills play extremely well in Australian ball and FIBA or something like that? and he is a backup PG. I wouldnt pick Longley in the top 20 this year, and Baynes not at all.




My point is that several NBA caliber players have come from there so we shouldn't discredit the place because of the perceived level of competition.


no, totally agree with that, wasnt trying to down play it. Probably shouldnt have quoted you in my statement.


I'm gonna shotgun with Optimus_Steel on this one too. Those few names alone are enough for me to credit that place as a credible institution for developing basketball talent. Whether or not Dante lives up to his expectations is one thing, but getting the proper preparation where he came from is plausible to me.
MellowRose
Banned User
Posts: 6,382
And1: 1,552
Joined: Oct 11, 2012

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#245 » by MellowRose » Fri May 23, 2014 2:40 pm

MagicStarwipe wrote:
MellowRose wrote:
MagicStarwipe wrote:Exum comes out of the AIS (Australian Institute of Sport). Same place Bogut and Patty Mills came from. He also played against some of the top talent in the world in his age bracket. He didn't just play Australian high school ball.


WOW...he came out of the **** AIS? Man, that **** is better than the NBA.


Who the **** cares about the AIS? Does it show us anything? NO. Does it help us in evaluating his talent and how he'll translate to the NBA? NO.

As to the he played against top talent, I'll say this briefly, since I already explained it in depth previously (especially the FIBA tourney), he took 8 FGA at the Nike Hoop Summit, while having garbage ass Andrew Harrison guarding him. Tallest "shot blocker" on team USA was Vonleh (who was 6-8 at the time), and he's not even known to be a tremendous shot blocker.

Small sample size (8 FGA) + no real shot blocker + garbage ass perimeter defender = Nothing.


Geez dude, you're taking this way too personally. All I said was he hasn't just played high school ball and you friggin' lose your s**t. Relax. The AIS is one of the most prestigous sports training institutions in the world. And you forgot to mention the FIBA world championships.


Ah, a brand new day. Now that I have my head on straight again, I apologize. Secondly, reacted that way because after arguing each point about Exum's games and his lack of going against legit big men, people are starting to throw out this AIS stuff as if it's proof of something when it's actually proof of nothing.

I feel like Exum people are gasping at straws to give him a one up on Smart, when in actuality, there's concrete proof that Smart is the better player (see my post comparing Exum's FIBA numbers and Smart's NCAA numbers).
MellowRose
Banned User
Posts: 6,382
And1: 1,552
Joined: Oct 11, 2012

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#246 » by MellowRose » Fri May 23, 2014 2:47 pm

Optimus_Steel wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
Optimus_Steel wrote:
Guys like Andrew Bogut, Luc Longley, Aron Baynes, and Patty Mills have come from AIS so its legit.


didnt Patty Mills play extremely well in Australian ball and FIBA or something like that? and he is a backup PG. I wouldnt pick Longley in the top 20 this year, and Baynes not at all.




My point is that several NBA caliber players have come from there so we shouldn't discredit the place because of the perceived level of competition.


IMO, that's analogous to saying a prospect has a one up on his competition because he played at a school like Oak Hill Academy (who, BTW, have had much greater and talented players come out).

So, if we have some dude named Deshawn Johnson coming out of Oak we should predict that he'll be a "legit" talent?

I'm sorry, but I'm not rocking the thought process behind this at all.
MellowRose
Banned User
Posts: 6,382
And1: 1,552
Joined: Oct 11, 2012

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#247 » by MellowRose » Fri May 23, 2014 3:03 pm

Bensational wrote:
Devin 1L wrote:
Oh, come on, really?

It means he's less proven and less certain.

Is it really that hard to comprehend that there would be a continuum of certainty based upon (a) a players output and (b) level of competition that they faced while producing that output.

Every draft pick is inherently unproven by the simple fact that by definition they've never played in the NBA, which is the future performance which we are attempting to predict.

If a player is out on the court dominating kids at Podunk Regional Middle School (inferior NBA talent,) they may well be a great NBA prospect, but it's going to be a lot more certain if that player is dominating the Big 12 in Division 1 of the NCAA (also inferior NBA talent.)


Ultimately there's more to scouting than simply noting the quality of the talent faced, and that's what has been lost in the last 10 pages.

Seems like nobody here is confident enough to analyze basketball skill and ability so they resort to analyzing the competition. They're analyzing the situation and not the player.

This applies to all draftees, not just Exum.

I'd like to challenge anyone to take the time watching some of Exum's highlights and finding measurements for the quickness of his first step in game, and compare that to Smart. I'd do it, if I weren't too busy. Might still try to make time. But let's try to elevate these discussions from the trivial bulls#!t I've been reading the last few pages.


MellowRose wrote:
Def Swami wrote:
MellowRose wrote:
Minutes players by Smart: Total - 141. Per game - 15.6 min
Minutes played by Exum: Total - 266. Per game - 25 min

Also, I don't understand how he held his own against his peers when he only played 11 minutes against the U.S.??? I'm told his team was getting a beat down, so coach pulled him early...or maybe it was to hide his deficiencies against a U.S. team that was shutting his ass down?

The stats can stack up amongst his peers for the FIBA U19 tournament. Marcus and he still played against the same teams in the tournament. They face the same competition. And he played against his peers in the Nike Hoop Summit.

I get it. Sample size. Everyone has a leg up on Exum because they played 32 games on TV. They also are at a disadvantage because they've been torn to shreds by us on forums nitpicking every facet of their game like we are doing now with Exum. But, the "competition" argument against Exum is kind of a meager one considering the success certain high school players have had in the past, and the fact that he has actually played against talent in other forms and had success.

Unlike some are proposing, it's not unrealistic for this kid to actually be the 4th best player in the draft while playing against inferior talent. It's harder for us novice, couch scouts to assess him in comparison with guys like Smart, but I'm sure the professionals will be able to figure it out (especially ours). Using the "competition" argument to choose one player over another just doesn't seem like sound thinking given the history of players coming out of high school without college experience and Exum's performances.

If you think Exum is lazy on defense, that's fair. If you think he'll flop because he can't jump, that's okay. Or if you just love the fire and passion that Marcus Smart displayed and his tenacious defense at OKST, that's cool. But, I'm not sure Exum should be completely discredited for playing against what we're assuming is inferior competition. It's a concern that requires further studying, but not something I'd base my draft pick around.


Sure, they played against the same competition, but Smart didn't ever have the same reign on his team as Exum did. Smart played 15.7 MPG (109th out of 171 players) and Exum 30 MPG (17th highest MPG played out of 171). Minutes inflating stats aside, if Smart was replaced with Exum on that team, I think anyone willing to say Smart wouldn't AT LEAST put up the same stats as Exum would be lying to themselves and everyone else on here. Call it homerism or whatever, but I believe if Smart was placed on Exum's team, he would have had much higher stats than Exum did, and Smart's college numbers can somewhat attest to the validity of that belief:

33 MPG, 42.2 FG%, 51.4 2P% (we all laud Oladipo for his superb FG%, but if we take the four extra 3 point FG's Smart took away from his FG%, would it really be all that different than Oladipo's numbers? All the while being the #1 option on that OK St. team. Even if you think it's a stretch to extrapolate Smart's FG% by taking away the four more 3's he took per game, 42.2% FG% for a #1 option who had no help at all offensively and who can still work to improve on shot selection is nothing to scoff at. Smart has the potential to be a dominant force while being efficient as hell.), 30% 3P% (on 5 3 point attempts per game. Jabari took 3.0 3's per game and has a 36% 3P%, while having payers like Hood and Sulaimon, who helped draw attention away from Jabari. Who did Smart have? Forte?), 6 rebounds per game, 5 assists, 3 steals (not to mention the chaos he creates defensively. Parallel to no one. Haven't seen this type of defense since Tony Allen), and 18 points.

Now, replace Exum with this beast, and you have someone who will eat up the opponent and post higher stats than Exum could dream of. If you have someone posting the same MPG, PPG, rebound, assists, 2P%, 3P%, and FT% in college ball as someone on a goddamn FIBA tournament, then there's is no way said person will not be able to post better stats at the tourney.

Again, as you posted earlier, these are Exum's stats:
Dante Exum's 2013 FIBA U19: 18.2 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 3.8 apg, 52.9% FG2, 33.3% FG3, 60.9% FT

Smart has the same numbers while playing NCAA ball.

He would dominate FIBA ball if he was in Exum's shoes. .



Here. Do you agree or disagree with the belief that if Exum had been replaced by Smart on that FIBA stats, he would have posted marginally (or AT LEAST) the same stats as Exum???
OrlChamps2030
General Manager
Posts: 8,040
And1: 4,337
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#248 » by OrlChamps2030 » Fri May 23, 2014 3:35 pm

MellowRose wrote:
Optimus_Steel wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
didnt Patty Mills play extremely well in Australian ball and FIBA or something like that? and he is a backup PG. I wouldnt pick Longley in the top 20 this year, and Baynes not at all.




My point is that several NBA caliber players have come from there so we shouldn't discredit the place because of the perceived level of competition.


IMO, that's analogous to saying a prospect has a one up on his competition because he played at a school like Oak Hill Academy (who, BTW, have had much greater and talented players come out).

So, if we have some dude named Deshawn Johnson coming out of Oak we should predict that he'll be a "legit" talent?

I'm sorry, but I'm not rocking the thought process behind this at all.

As far as I can tell no one is claiming Exum has a "one up" on his competition. They are moreso trying to justify that Exum's level of talent he competed against was OK at times not just 5"8 kids who have never played basketball before. Like some would have you believe
MellowRose
Banned User
Posts: 6,382
And1: 1,552
Joined: Oct 11, 2012

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#249 » by MellowRose » Fri May 23, 2014 3:38 pm

Zmill wrote:
MellowRose wrote:
Optimus_Steel wrote:


My point is that several NBA caliber players have come from there so we shouldn't discredit the place because of the perceived level of competition.


IMO, that's analogous to saying a prospect has a one up on his competition because he played at a school like Oak Hill Academy (who, BTW, have had much greater and talented players come out).

So, if we have some dude named Deshawn Johnson coming out of Oak we should predict that he'll be a "legit" talent?

I'm sorry, but I'm not rocking the thought process behind this at all.

As far as I can tell no one is claiming Exum has a "one up" on his competition. They are moreso trying to justify that Exum's level of talent he competed against was OK at times not just 5"8 kids who have never played basketball before. Like some would have you believe


Do we have any stats or videos from the AIS?
IllMagic04
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,840
And1: 1,875
Joined: Jul 06, 2012
Location: Baltimore MD
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#250 » by IllMagic04 » Fri May 23, 2014 3:44 pm

Is there really a chance the Bucks take Exum at number 2? I can't see that
Nyce_1
RealGM
Posts: 12,969
And1: 6,114
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: Tampa
 

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#251 » by Nyce_1 » Fri May 23, 2014 3:59 pm

IllMagic04 wrote:Is there really a chance the Bucks take Exum at number 2? I can't see that

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1323408
User avatar
OrlDave
General Manager
Posts: 8,137
And1: 3,022
Joined: May 05, 2003
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#252 » by OrlDave » Fri May 23, 2014 4:10 pm

Regarding Smart vs Exum, it comes down to potential. It's a dirty word, but we are trying to find a star. Don't get me wrong, I like Smart, and if we get him that means our extremely capable management team has decided Exum is too much of a risk. At that point, I'll gladly cheer the pick and for Smart. I just don't see Smart's ceiling as being high enough to be the focal point of the team. His floor is certainly much higher than Exum's and that is, of course, the inherent risk of picking potential over a known quantity.
User avatar
InFlames
RealGM
Posts: 11,089
And1: 3,176
Joined: Mar 16, 2010
Location: Orlando
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#253 » by InFlames » Fri May 23, 2014 4:24 pm

I don't think Embiid falls. I don't believe anything any of the sports writers or anyone else is saying right now about him. I think hes probably still #1 on everyone's board. That being said if he does fall to #4 the only reason would be because of his back, and that is scary.
IllMagic04
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,840
And1: 1,875
Joined: Jul 06, 2012
Location: Baltimore MD
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#254 » by IllMagic04 » Fri May 23, 2014 4:29 pm

InFlames wrote:I don't think Embiid falls. I don't believe anything any of the sports writers or anyone else is saying right now about him. I think hes probably still #1 on everyone's board. That being said if he does fall to #4 the only reason would be because of his back, and that is scary.


Agreed. Very scary. Hopefully his back checks out so we have the option of Exum or Smart.
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,765
And1: 11,246
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#255 » by KillMonger » Fri May 23, 2014 4:54 pm

To me I think smart can be a mike Conley level player. Exum although a mystery could be a superstar. I would be very happy with either.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Image
MellowRose
Banned User
Posts: 6,382
And1: 1,552
Joined: Oct 11, 2012

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#256 » by MellowRose » Fri May 23, 2014 4:55 pm

Big Boss wrote:To me I think smart can be a mike Conley level player. Exum although a mystery could be a superstar. I would be very happy with either.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using RealGM Forums mobile app


Isn't this ironic and just...backwards? Does that sentence really make sense to you?
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,765
And1: 11,246
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#257 » by KillMonger » Fri May 23, 2014 6:03 pm

MellowRose wrote:
Big Boss wrote:To me I think smart can be a mike Conley level player. Exum although a mystery could be a superstar. I would be very happy with either.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using RealGM Forums mobile app


Isn't this ironic and just...backwards? Does that sentence really make sense to you?
yes it does, if he hits his potential then he has all the tools to be a superstar

Sent from my Nexus 5 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Image
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,249
And1: 8,967
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#258 » by drsd » Fri May 23, 2014 7:44 pm

orthoman wrote:IMO, If Exum goes at #2 and Embiid falls to us, we've maybe got a dilemma on our hands.

If Embiid falls, teams head of us are staying away from him due to back issues. I don't think Hennigan will pick
Embiid in this scenario. (risk)

We've got a promising center in Vucevic.

Who do we pick at #4 then? Smart?



This is a scenario where Orlando seriously looks to trade the pick. The rights to Embiid would be worth a fortune to a team like the Bobcats, Orlando could really make out in this kind of trade. The #9 pick, Cody Zeller, a future unprotected 1st could be the starting point to such a trade.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,249
And1: 8,967
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#259 » by drsd » Fri May 23, 2014 7:45 pm

orthoman wrote:There is a very good chance we may never see Exum drop to us. Milwaukee likes him a lot at #2


I am now convinced the Bucks draft Parker.


..
Optimus_Steel
RealGM
Posts: 38,264
And1: 12,195
Joined: Sep 16, 2003
Location: Winter Garden, FL
   

Re: The Dante Exum Thread 

Post#260 » by Optimus_Steel » Fri May 23, 2014 9:35 pm

Zmill wrote:
MellowRose wrote:
Optimus_Steel wrote:


My point is that several NBA caliber players have come from there so we shouldn't discredit the place because of the perceived level of competition.


IMO, that's analogous to saying a prospect has a one up on his competition because he played at a school like Oak Hill Academy (who, BTW, have had much greater and talented players come out).

So, if we have some dude named Deshawn Johnson coming out of Oak we should predict that he'll be a "legit" talent?

I'm sorry, but I'm not rocking the thought process behind this at all.

As far as I can tell no one is claiming Exum has a "one up" on his competition. They are moreso trying to justify that Exum's level of talent he competed against was OK at times not just 5"8 kids who have never played basketball before. Like some would have you believe


That's the gist of my post. Thanks.
aka: prorl

Return to Orlando Magic